Defining the typical work environment for assisted reproductive technology laboratories in the United States

被引:4
|
作者
Boone, WR [1 ]
Higdon, HL [1 ]
机构
[1] Greenville Hosp Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, ART & Androl Labs, Greenville, SC 29605 USA
关键词
assisted reproductive technology; ART; laboratory personnel; staffing requirements; time requirements;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.03.038
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine time and staffing requirements as they relate to laboratory personnel in the field of assisted reproductive technology (ART). Design: Descriptive study. Setting: Assisted reproductive technology clinics in the United States. Personnel:. All personnel working in ART laboratories, which included laboratory directors and technicians (those laboratory personnel trained in specific areas of embryology, andrology, and endocrinology). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measures(s): Frequencies were determined for time and staffing requirements as they pertained to individuals and procedures (e.g., oocyte retrieval, embryo transfer, semen analysis, hormone assay, etc.) performed in embryology, andrology, and endocrine laboratories. Result(s): Two different surveys of ART clinics in the United States were combined in this report. The average technician worked 40 hours a week, whereas the average laboratory director worked 49 hours per week. The average embryologist performed 181 procedures (not cases) per year. The average andrologist performed 648 procedures (not cases) per year, while the average endocrinologist completed 2,673 procedures (not cases) per year. Conclusion(s): This is the first report to describe time and staffing requirements as they relate to the laboratory personnel in an ART facility.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 626
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Assisted reproductive technology cycles involving male factor infertility in the United States, 2017-2018: data from the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System
    Jewett, Amy
    Warner, Lee
    Kawwass, Jennifer F.
    Mehta, Akanksha
    Eisenberg, Michael L.
    Nangia, Ajay K.
    Dupree, James M.
    Honig, Stanton
    Hotaling, James M.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    F&S REPORTS, 2022, 3 (02): : 124 - 130
  • [24] Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997-2000
    Reynolds, MA
    Schieve, LA
    Martin, JA
    Jeng, G
    Macaluso, M
    PEDIATRICS, 2003, 111 (05) : 1159 - 1162
  • [25] Assessment of united states fertility clinic websites according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) guidelines
    Abusief, Mary E.
    Hornstein, Mark D.
    Jain, Tarun
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 87 (01) : 88 - 92
  • [26] High rates of embryo wastage with use of assisted reproductive technology: a look at the trends between 1995 and 2001 in the United States
    Kovalevsky, G
    Patrizio, P
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 (02) : 325 - 330
  • [27] Moving toward Narrowing the United States Gap in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Next Decade
    Mahabamunuge, Jasmin
    Seifer, David B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (08)
  • [28] Defining Low Prognosis Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: POSEIDON Criteria-The Why
    Esteves, Sandro C.
    Roque, Matheus
    Bedoschi, Giuliano M.
    Conforti, Alessandro
    Humaidan, Peter
    Alviggi, Carlo
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [29] Assisted Reproductive Technology and Perinatal Mortality: Selected States (2006-2011)
    Chang, Jeani
    Zhang, Yujia
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Crawford, Sara B.
    Copeland, Glenn E.
    Bernson, Dana
    Kirby, Russell S.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Barfield, Wanda D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2023, 40 (09) : 953 - 959
  • [30] Assisted reproductive technologies: Estimates of their contribution to multiple births and newborn hospital days in the United States
    Wilcox, LS
    Kiely, JL
    Melvin, CL
    Martin, MC
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1996, 65 (02) : 361 - 366