Evaluation of three-dimensional changes after sinus floor augmentation with different grafting materials

被引:101
作者
Kirmeier, Robert [3 ]
Payer, Michael [3 ]
Wehrschuetz, Martin [2 ]
Jakse, Norbert [3 ]
Platzer, Susanne [1 ]
Lorenzoni, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Graz, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, A-8086 Graz, Austria
[2] Med Univ Graz, Dept Radiol, Graz, Austria
[3] Med Univ Graz, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Surg, Graz, Austria
关键词
computed tomography; grafting materials; sinus augmentation; volume change;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01487.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this retrospective investigation was to assess the dimensional stability of different grafting materials after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with computed tomography (CT) scans. Materials and methods: Two postoperative CT scans were available from 16 patients who had undergone maxillary sinus lift procedures. The first scan was made within a few days after the surgical intervention and the second one > 6 months later. A total of 25 maxillary sinuses were augmented with different materials before implant insertion by lateral antrostomy in a staged approach. The volume of bone formation was calculated using the Somaris (R) Sienet Magic View software. Results: Based on volumetric measurements of the augmented domes derived from the image sections, shrinkage was about 26%. The mean of the augmented bone volume was 3.02 cm(3) (1.4-5.56 cm(3); SD +/- 1.18 cm(3)) as determined in the first CT scan. The respective mean volume in the second CT scan amounted to 2.28 cm(3) (0.92-4.46 cm(3); SD +/- 1.07 cm(3)). Conclusion: Within the limits of our descriptive and analytic study, the results indicate a significant reduction of the graft volume after maxillary sinus augmentation. Further prospective studies will have to evaluate the quantitative changes of different bone graft materials for maxillary sinus augmentation procedures in order to improve long-term implant stability.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 372
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Aranyarachkul P, 2005, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V20, P416
[2]  
Bianchi J, 2004, INT J PERIODONT REST, V24, P579
[3]  
Block MS, 1998, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V56, P706, DOI 10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90801-1
[4]   Radiographic evaluation of mandibular posterior implant sites: Correlation between panoramic and tomographic determinations [J].
Bolin, A ;
Eliasson, S ;
vonBeetzen, M ;
Jansson, L .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1996, 7 (04) :354-359
[5]   Contributions of reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the localization of third molars relative to the maxillary sinus [J].
Bouquet, A ;
Coudert, JL ;
Bourgeois, D ;
Mazoyer, JF ;
Bossard, D .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2004, 98 (03) :342-347
[6]  
BOYNE PJ, 1980, J ORAL SURG, V38, P613
[7]   Semi-automatic segmentation of computed tomographic images in volumetric estimation of nasal airway [J].
Dastidar, P ;
Heinonen, T ;
Numminen, J ;
Rautiainen, M ;
Laasonen, E .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 256 (04) :192-198
[8]   Radiographic analysis of the transcrestal sinus floor elevation: Short-term observations [J].
Diserens, V ;
Mericske, E ;
Mericske-Stern, R .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2005, 7 (02) :70-78
[10]   Maxilla sinus grafting with marine algae derived bone forming material: A clinical report of long-term results [J].
Ewers, R .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 63 (12) :1712-1723