Predictability of Delayed Visual Feedback Under Rubber Hand Illusion Modulates Localization but Not Ownership of the Hand

被引:1
作者
Shibuya, Satoshi [1 ]
Unenaka, Satoshi [2 ]
Ohki, Yukari [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyorin Univ, Sch Med, Dept Integrat Physiol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Hokusho Univ, Sch Lifelong Sport, Dept Sport Educ, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
body ownership; rubber hand illusion; multisensory integration; delayed visual feedback; predictability; body representation; TOUCH; SELF; STIMULATION; PARIETAL; THATS; LIMB;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771284
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The rubber hand illusion (RHI) is a perceptual illusion, whereby a fake hand is recognized as one's own hand when a fake hand and felt real hand are stroked synchronously. RHI strength is mainly assessed using a questionnaire rating and proprioceptive drift (PD). PD is characterized by the proprioceptively sensed location of the participant's own hand shifting toward the location of the fake hand after RHI. However, the relationship between the two measures of hand ownership and location remains controversial due to mixed findings: some studies report correlations between them, while others show that they are independent. Here, we demonstrated significant PD without RHI using delayed visual feedback. In this RHI study, video images of the fake hand were delivered to the subjects, and four delay intervals of visual feedback (80, 280, 480, and 680ms) were introduced. In four of six conditions, the delay interval was fixed throughout the condition. In the other two conditions, four delays were delivered in a predetermined order (i.e., serial condition; higher predictability) or in a pseudo-random order (i.e., random condition; low predictability). For the four conditions with a fixed delay, the questionnaire ratings and PD declined significantly when the delay interval exceeded circa 300ms. In both the serial and random conditions, no illusory ownership of the fake hand was reported in the questionnaire. In contrast, greater PD was found in the random condition but not in the serial condition. Our findings suggest that hand ownership and localization are caused by distinct multisensory integration processes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   No causal link between changes in hand position sense and feeling of limb ownership in the rubber hand illusion [J].
Abdulkarim, Zakaryah ;
Ehrsson, H. Henrik .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2016, 78 (02) :707-720
[2]   Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see [J].
Botvinick, M ;
Cohen, J .
NATURE, 1998, 391 (6669) :756-756
[3]   That's Near My Hand! Parietal and Premotor Coding of Hand-Centered Space Contributes to Localization and Self-Attribution of the Hand [J].
Brozzoli, Claudio ;
Gentile, Giovanni ;
Ehrsson, H. Henrik .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 32 (42) :14573-14582
[4]   Assessing the Role of the 'Unity Assumption' on Multisensory Integration: A Review [J].
Chen, Yi-Chuan ;
Spence, Charles .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
[5]   Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science [J].
Clark, Andy .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2013, 36 (03) :181-204
[6]   Children's Responses to the Rubber-Hand Illusion Reveal Dissociable Pathways in Body Representation [J].
Cowie, Dorothy ;
Makin, Tamar R. ;
Bremner, Andrew J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 24 (05) :762-769
[7]   That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb [J].
Ehrsson, HH ;
Spence, C ;
Passingham, RE .
SCIENCE, 2004, 305 (5685) :875-877
[8]   Affective certainty and congruency of touch modulate the experience of the rubber hand illusion [J].
Filippetti, Maria Laura ;
Kirsch, Louise P. ;
Crucianelli, Laura ;
Fotopoulou, Aikaterini .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
[9]   The rubber hand illusion in hypnosis provides new insights into the sense of body ownership [J].
Fiorio, Mirta ;
Modenese, Michele ;
Cesari, Paola .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
[10]   Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science [J].
Gallagher, S .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (01) :14-21