Low effective mechanical advantage of giraffes' limbs during walking reveals trade-off between limb length and locomotor performance

被引:5
作者
Basu, Christopher [1 ,2 ]
Hutchinson, John R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, Sch Vet Med, Dept Comparat Biomed Sci, Guildford GU2 7AL, England
[2] Royal Vet Coll, Dept Comparat Biomed Sci, Stucture & Mot Lab, Hatfield AL9 7TA, Herts, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
biomechanics; quadrupeds; computer modeling; MAXIMAL RUNNING SPEED; MUSCLE MOMENT ARMS; BODY-MASS; BIOMECHANICS; ENERGETICS; COST; TYRANNOSAURUS; KINEMATICS; ALLOMETRY; MAMMALS;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.2108471119
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis) possess specialized locomotor morphology, namely elongate and gracile distal limbs. While this contributes to their overall height and enhances feeding behavior, we propose that the combination of long limb segments and modest muscle lever arms results in low effective mechanical advantage (EMA, the ratio of in-lever to out-lever moment arms), when compared with other cursorial mammals To test this, we used a combination of experimentally measured kinematics and ground reaction forces (GRFs), musculoskeletal modeling, and inverse dynamics to calculate giraffe forelimb EMA during walking. Giraffes walk with an EMA of 0.34 (+/- 0.05 SD), with no evident association with speed within their walking gait. Giraffe EMA was about four times lower than expectations extrapolated from other mammals, ranging from 0.03 to 297 kg, and this provides further evidence that EMA plateaus or even diminishes in mammals exceeding horse size. We further tested the idea that limb segment length is a factor which determines EMA, by modeling the GRF and muscle moment arms in the extinct giraffid Sivatherium giganteum and the other extant giraffid, Okapia johnstoni. Giraffa and Okapia shared similar EMA, despite a four to sixfold difference in body mass (Okapia EMA = 0.38). In contrast, Sivatherium, sharing a similar body mass with Giraffa, had greater EMA (0.59), which we propose reflects behavioral differences, such as a somewhat increased capability for athletic performance. Our modeling approach suggests that limb length is a determinant of GRF moment arm magnitude and that unless muscle moment arms scale isometrically with limb length, tall mammals are prone to low EMA.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   ALLOMETRY OF THE LEG MUSCLES OF MAMMALS [J].
ALEXANDER, RM ;
JAYES, AS ;
MALOIY, GMO ;
WATHUTA, EM .
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1981, 194 (AUG) :539-552
[2]   Variation in Center of Mass Estimates for Extant Sauropsids and its Importance for Reconstructing Inertial Properties of Extinct Archosaurs [J].
Allen, Vivian ;
Paxton, Heather ;
Hutchinson, John R. .
ANATOMICAL RECORD-ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE ANATOMY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2009, 292 (09) :1442-1461
[3]   The giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) cervical vertebral column: a heuristic example in understanding evolutionary processes? [J].
Badlangana, N. Ludo ;
Adams, Justin W. ;
Manger, Paul R. .
ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2009, 155 (03) :736-757
[4]  
Basu C., SIVATHERIUM GIGANTEU
[5]  
Basu C., FIGSHARE, DOI [10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5396853, DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.C.5396853]
[6]   The locomotor kinematics and ground reaction forces of walking giraffes [J].
Basu, Christopher ;
Wilson, Alan M. ;
Hutchinson, John R. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 222 (02)
[7]   The extinct, giant giraffid Sivatherium giganteum: skeletal reconstruction and body mass estimation [J].
Basu, Christopher ;
Falkingham, Peter L. ;
Hutchinson, John R. .
BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 12 (01)
[8]   The running kinematics of free-roaming giraffes, measured using a low cost unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV ) [J].
Basu, Christopher K. ;
Deacon, Francois ;
Hutchinson, John R. ;
Wilson, Alan M. .
PEERJ, 2019, 7
[9]   SCALING BODY SUPPORT IN MAMMALS - LIMB POSTURE AND MUSCLE MECHANICS [J].
BIEWENER, AA .
SCIENCE, 1989, 245 (4913) :45-48
[10]   Biomechanical consequences of scaling [J].
Biewener, AA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2005, 208 (09) :1665-1676