Methods and materials for the measurement of subjective and objective measurements of image quality

被引:13
作者
Marsh, DM [1 ]
Malone, JF [1 ]
机构
[1] St James Hosp, Dept Med Phys & Bioengn, Dublin 8, Ireland
关键词
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006476
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The evaluation of medical imaging systems may be performed using both subjective (e.g. high contrast limiting resolution, and low contrast detail detectability), and objective/physical (e.g. characteristic curve, signal-to-noise ratio, modulation transfer function, and Wiener spectra) indices of image quality. For the purposes of Quality Assurance subjective measurements currently have a wider usage in the clinical environment due to the inherent simplicity of the measurements; however, more rigorous objective approaches are gaining acceptability, and represent a paradigm for possible future QA measurements. Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages. There is currently wide debate as to the interpretation of these measurements. However, there appears to be a lack of standardisation among scientists in the various approaches to making these measurements, and especially so in the case of objective indices; furthermore, the measurement protocol used must have a bearing on the interpretation of subsequent results. The purpose of this paper is to (i) present the most fundamental indices in the characterisation of 'image quality'. and (ii) recommend approaches to the measurement of these indices.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 42
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   NOISE-ANALYSIS OF A DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM [J].
ARNOLD, BA ;
SCHEIBE, PO .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1984, 142 (03) :609-613
[2]  
BARRETT, 1981, RADIOLOGICAL IMAGING
[3]  
BIRD C, 1990, COMPUTERS DIAGNOSTIC, P133
[4]   FILTER WHEEL EQUALIZATION IN DSA - SIMULATION RESULTS [J].
BOONE, JM ;
GARDINER, GA ;
LEVIN, DC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (02) :439-448
[5]   HUMAN VISUAL-PERCEPTION AND ROC METHODOLOGY IN MEDICAL IMAGING [J].
CHESTERS, MS .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1992, 37 (07) :1433-1476
[6]   QUANTITATIVE RELATION BETWEEN DETECTABILITY AND NOISE POWER [J].
CHESTERS, MS ;
HAY, GA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1983, 28 (10) :1113-1125
[7]   EVALUATION OF A DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY UNIT [J].
COHEN, G ;
WAGNER, LK ;
RAUSCHKOLB, EN .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 144 (03) :613-617
[8]  
COONEY P, 1995, RADIAT PROT DOSIM, V57, P269
[9]  
COWAN AR, 1991, MEAS SCI TECHNOL, V2, P691
[10]  
COWAN AR, 1987, BRIT J RADIOL, V60, P1010