Setting up of recovery profiles:: A tool to perform the compliance with recovery requirements for residue analysis

被引:7
作者
Cuadros-Rodríguez, L
Almansa-López, EM
García-Campaña, AM
González-Casado, A
Egea-González, FJ
Garrido-Frenich, A
Martínez-Vidal, U
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Analyt Chem, Sch Qualimetr, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[2] Univ Almeria, Dept Analyt Chem, E-04120 Almeria, Spain
关键词
recovery factor; apparent recovery; calibration recovery; uncertainty; recovery profile;
D O I
10.1016/j.talanta.2005.01.009
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The use of the recovery term has presented some confusion in Analytical Chemistry. Recent IUPAC recommendations propose to distinguish between two terms: recovery or recovery factor, K, and apparent recovery, K-*. Apparent recovery includes recovery factor and a new recovery term proposed in this paper, named calibration recovery,, K-C, which depends of the type of systematic error due to the matrix effect (constant and/or proportional) and is related to the applied calibration methodology. This paper highlights the dependence of the calibration recovery on the sample analyte concentration and, for extension, of the apparent recovery, defines the recovery profile, and makes evident the need to determine a "fit for purpose" analyte concentration interval to comply with a regulated recovery requirements. An approach to estimate the calibration recovery and its associated uncertainty in relation to the above-mentioned dependence is presented. The usefulness of the proposed methodology has been shown in the quantification of a pesticide by GC-ECD for assessing dermal exposure. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1063 / 1072
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Barwick VJ, 1999, ANALYST, V124, P981, DOI 10.1039/a901845j
[2]   Use of the terms "recovery" and "apparent recovery" in analytical procedures - (IUPAC recommendations 2002) [J].
Burns, DT ;
Danzer, K ;
Townshend, A .
PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 2002, 74 (11) :2201-2205
[3]  
Caudros-Rodríguez L, 2001, TRAC-TREND ANAL CHEM, V20, P620
[4]   Correction function on biased results due to matrix effects -: Application to the routine analysis of pesticide residues [J].
Cuadros-Rodríguez, L ;
García-Campaña, AM ;
Almansa-López, E ;
Egea-González, FJ ;
Cano, MLC ;
Frenich, AG ;
Martínez-Vidal, JL .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2003, 478 (02) :281-301
[5]   Assessment of uncertainty in pesticide multiresidue analytical methods:: main sources and estimation [J].
Cuadros-Rodríguez, L ;
Torres, MEH ;
López, EA ;
González, FJE ;
Liébanas, FJA ;
Vidal, JLM .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2002, 454 (02) :297-314
[6]   Calibration in chemical measurement processes:: I.: A metrological approach [J].
Cuadros-Rodríguez, L ;
Gámiz-Cracia, L ;
Almansa-López, E ;
Laso-Sánchez, J .
TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 20 (04) :195-206
[7]  
da Silva RJNB, 2000, ANALYST, V125, P1459, DOI 10.1039/b000801j
[8]   Worst case uncertainty estimates for routine instrumental analysis [J].
da Silva, RJNB ;
Santos, JR ;
Camoes, MFGFC .
ANALYST, 2002, 127 (07) :957-963
[9]  
EGEA F, 1999, CHROMATOGRAPHIA, V50, P293
[10]  
European Directive, 2002, OFF J EUR COMM