Working from home and disabled people's employment outcomes

被引:15
作者
Hoque, Kim [1 ]
Bacon, Nick [2 ]
机构
[1] Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] City Univ London, Bayes Business Sch, London, England
关键词
FAMILY CONFLICT; JOB CONTROL; TELEWORK; DISABILITY; INDIVIDUALS; EMPLOYEES; IMPACT; ACCOMMODATION; METAANALYSIS; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1111/bjir.12645
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper assesses disabled employees' likelihood of working from home relative to non-disabled employees, and the implications of doing so for their experiences of work. Analysing British nationally representative data, the findings suggest that disabled employees are less likely to work from home than non-disabled employees, given they are disproportionately excluded from the higher-paying and/or managerial roles in which working from home is more widely available. In addition, organizations in which working from home is more commonplace do not employ a higher proportion of disabled people. The results also confirm disabled employees report poorer experiences of work than non-disabled employees regarding job control, job-related mental health, job satisfaction and work-life balance. Although working from home is positively associated with these outcomes (except for work-life balance) for both disabled and non-disabled employees, there is very little evidence it is associated with smaller disability gaps in these outcomes. Therefore, our analysis questions the potential for working from home to reduce disability disadvantage within organizations, and highlights the need for more substantial action to address the barriers to employment that disabled people encounter.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 56
页数:25
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings
    Allen, Tammy D.
    Golden, Timothy D.
    Shockley, Kristen M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 2015, 16 (02) : 40 - 68
  • [2] Work-Family Conflict and Flexible Work Arrangements: Deconstructing Flexibility
    Allen, Tammy D.
    Johnson, Ryan C.
    Kiburz, Kaitlin M.
    Shockley, Kristen M.
    [J]. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 66 (02) : 345 - 376
  • [3] Estimating disability prevalence and disability-related inequalities: Does the choice of measure matter?
    Amilon, Anna
    Hansen, Kasper M.
    Kjaer, Agnete Aslaug
    Steffensen, Tinne
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2021, 272
  • [4] Anand P, 2017, IZA J LABOR POLICY, V6, DOI 10.1186/s40173-017-0090-4
  • [5] Anderson J., 2001, J VOCAT REHABIL, V16, P97
  • [6] DO ANONYMOUS JOB APPLICATION PROCEDURES LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD?
    Aslund, Olof
    Skans, Oskar Nordstrom
    [J]. ILR REVIEW, 2012, 65 (01) : 82 - 107
  • [7] Modelling linkages between flexible work arrangements' use and organizational outcomes
    Azar, Sana
    Khan, Aamir
    Van Eerde, Wendelien
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2018, 91 : 134 - 143
  • [8] Baker Paul M A, 2006, Work, V27, P421
  • [9] The impact of anticipated social consequences on recurring disability accommodation requestst
    Baldridge, DC
    Veiga, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2006, 32 (01) : 158 - 179
  • [10] Disability, work, and welfare: challenging the social exclusion of disabled people
    Barnes, C
    Mercer, G
    [J]. WORK EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIETY, 2005, 19 (03) : 527 - 545