Team personality composition, affective ties and knowledge sharing: a team-level analysis

被引:11
作者
Hsu, Bi-Fen [2 ]
Wu, Wei-Li [1 ]
Yeh, Ryh-Song [3 ]
机构
[1] Ching Yun Univ, Dept Int Business Management, Jhongli, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Business Adm, Douliou City 640, Yunlin County, Taiwan
[3] Yuan Ze Univ, Dept Int Business, Chungli 32003, Taiwan
关键词
team personality composition; affective ties; knowledge sharing; ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; 5-FACTOR MODEL; JOB-PERFORMANCE; MODERATING ROLE; WORK; NETWORKS; DETERMINANTS; DIMENSIONS; MANAGEMENT; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1504/IJTM.2011.038597
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
As knowledge has become the most valuable asset for organisations in the knowledge economy age, the related issue of knowledge management has attracted increasing attention. In particular, the concept of knowledge sharing, a necessary process for organisations seeking fruitful knowledge transfer and creation can help organisations gain and sustain a competitive advantage. In this study, we investigate the issue of knowledge sharing based on the input-process-output (IPO) model at the team level. Fifty-three teams composed of 205 employees participated in this exploration of the relationships among team personality composition (based on a five-factor personality model), team process (affective ties) and team outcomes (knowledge sharing). With respect to team personality composition, higher team mean levels of conscientiousness, agreeableness, openness to experience and extroversion corresponded with higher levels of knowledge sharing. Agreeableness and extroversion also were associated with knowledge sharing through intra-team affective ties.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 351
页数:21
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1964, Exchange and Power
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement
[3]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[4]   THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (01) :1-26
[5]   Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness [J].
Barrick, MR ;
Stewart, GL ;
Neubert, MJ ;
Mount, MK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (03) :377-391
[6]   AUTONOMY AS A MODERATOR OF THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (01) :111-118
[7]   Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality [J].
Barry, B ;
Stewart, GL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (01) :62-78
[8]   THE PSYCHOLOGY OF INTERGROUP ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR [J].
BREWER, MB ;
KRAMER, RM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 36 :219-243
[9]  
Butterfield F., 1983, China: Alive in the bitter sea
[10]  
CHANG YT, 2002, STUDY RELATION UNPUB