Optimal Power Flow of Renewable-Integrated Power Systems Using a Gaussian Bare-Bones Levy-Flight Firefly Algorithm

被引:14
作者
Alghamdi, Ali S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Majmaah Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Elect Engn, Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
OPF problem; Gaussian bare-bones levy-flight firefly algorithm (GBLFA); modified GBLFA; wind and solar energy systems; nonsmooth cost functions; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; BEE COLONY ALGORITHM; INCORPORATING STOCHASTIC WIND; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION ALGORITHM; HYBRID ALGORITHM; GENERATION; COST; COORDINATION; OPERATIONS; EMISSION;
D O I
10.3389/fenrg.2022.921936
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This article proposes a Gaussian bare-bones Levy-flight firefly algorithm (GBLFA) and its modified version named MGBLFA for optimizing the various kinds of the different optimal power flow (OPF) problems in the presence of conventional thermal power generators and intermittent renewable energy resources such as solar photovoltaic (PV) and wind power (WE). Several objective functions, including fuel costs, emission, power loss, and voltage deviation, are considered in the OPF problem subject to economic, technical, and safety constraints. Also, the uncertainties of solar irradiance and wind speed are modeled using Weibull, lognormal probability distribution functions, and their influences are considered in the OPF problem. Proper cost functions associated with the power generation of PV and WE units are modeled. A comprehensive analysis of ten cases with various objectives on the IEEE 30-bus test system demonstrates the potential effects of renewable energies on the optimal scheduling of thermal power plants in a cost-emission-effective manner. Numerical results show the superiority of the proposed method over other state-of-the-art algorithms in finding optimal solutions for the OPF problems.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Differential search algorithm for solving multi-objective optimal power flow problem [J].
Abaci, Kadir ;
Yamacli, Volkan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2016, 79 :1-10
[2]   An improved version of salp swarm algorithm for solving optimal power flow problem [J].
Abd El-sattar, Salma ;
Kamel, Salah ;
Ebeed, Mohamed ;
Jurado, Francisco .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (05) :4027-4052
[3]   Optimal power flow using tabu search algorithm [J].
Abido, MA .
ELECTRIC POWER COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS, 2002, 30 (05) :469-483
[4]   Artificial bee colony algorithm for solving multi-objective optimal power flow problem [J].
Adaryani, M. Rezaei ;
Karami, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2013, 53 :219-230
[5]   Optimal Power Flow via Teaching-Learning-Studying-Based Optimization Algorithm [J].
Akbari, Ebrahim ;
Ghasemi, Mojtaba ;
Gil, Milad ;
Rahimnejad, Abolfazl ;
Gadsden, S. Andrew .
ELECTRIC POWER COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS, 2022, 49 (6-7) :584-601
[6]   Chaotic artificial bee colony algorithm based solution of security and transient stability constrained optimal power flow [J].
Ayan, Kursat ;
Kilic, Ulas ;
Barakli, Burhan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2015, 64 :136-147
[7]   An enhanced moth-swarm algorithm for efficient energy management based multi dimensions OPF problem [J].
Bentouati, Bachir ;
Khelifi, Aboubakr ;
Shaheen, Abdullah M. ;
El-Sehiemy, Ragab A. .
JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2021, 12 (10) :9499-9519
[8]   Optimal power flow solutions using differential evolution algorithm integrated with effective constraint handling techniques [J].
Biswas, Partha P. ;
Suganthan, P. N. ;
Mallipeddi, R. ;
Amaratunga, Gehan A. J. .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 68 :81-100
[9]   Optimal power flow solutions incorporating stochastic wind and solar power [J].
Biswas, Partha P. ;
Suganthan, P. N. ;
Amaratunga, Gehan A. J. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 148 :1194-1207
[10]   Optimal power flow using an Improved Colliding Bodies Optimization algorithm [J].
Bouchekara, H. R. E. H. ;
Chaib, A. E. ;
Abido, M. A. ;
El-Sehiemy, R. A. .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 42 :119-131