Our experience with transanal endorectal pull-through in Hirschsprung's disease

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the functional results, complications, the problems caused, and the outcomes of the transanal endorectal pull-through (TEPT) operation in Hirschsprung's disease. Patients and Methods: The 22 patients who were operated for Hirschsprung's disease with TEPT between November 2003 and September 2006 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were evaluated for age, gender, operational findings, duration of hospitalization and functional outcomes after the operation. Results: A total of 22 patients, sixteen males (72.7%) and 6 females (27.3%) aged 23 days to 11 years (mean 19.3 +/- 6.9 months), were operated using TEPT over a 34-month period. The mean length of the resected aganglionic segment was 23 +/- 2.4 cm; the shortest segment was 7 cm and the longest 40 cm. The postoperative hospital stay was 3 - 10 days, oral feeding was started at 1 - 4 days, the first bowel movement was at 1 - 7 days and the number of daily movements for patients in whom the colostomy was closed was 2 - 5. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 18 +/- 2.4 months (1 - 33 months). Two patients (9%) were hospitalized once for enterocolitis. One patient had a constipation problem that resolved with medical treatment. One patient needed colostomy for anastomosis leakage on the 5th postoperative day, followed by a redo pull-through using a posterior sagittal approach. None of the patients had a continence problem. No urethral damage was observed and there were no abscesses at the muscular cuff. We observed that mucosal dissection was more difficult in the rectal biopsy area. Conclusions: Although only recently accepted, TEPT has quickly found a place in clinical practice as it is based on an operational technique whose results are well identified and accepted and with which there is extensive experience. It seems that TEPT has the advantages of having no additional problems compared to the classical techniques with respect to complications and functional outcomes while providing better patient comfort and cosmetic outcomes. We conclude that TEPT may be preferred in appropriate cases and will evolve to become a more practical and effective technique.