Relationship between recovery period of lower lip hypoesthesia and sagittal split area or plate screw position after sagittal split ramus osteotomy

被引:20
作者
Hashiba, Yukari [1 ]
Ueki, Koichiro [1 ]
Marukawa, Kohei [1 ]
Nakagawa, Kiyomasa [1 ]
Yamamoto, Etsuhide [1 ]
Matsubara, Kosuke [1 ]
机构
[1] Kanazawa Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9208641, Japan
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY | 2008年 / 105卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.04.006
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. The purpose of this study was to objectively evaluate the relationship between recovery of hypoesthesia of the lower lip after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with trigeminal somatosensory evoked potential (TSEP) and sagittal split area or plate screw position, using postoperative computerized tomography (CT). Study design. The subjects consisted of 58 patients (116 sides) with mandibular prognathism who underwent SSRO. The patients were divided into 2 groups. The Ob group, consisting of 62 sides, underwent the Obwegeser method. The OD group, consisting of 54 sides, underwent the Obwegeser-Dal Pont method. Trigeminal nerve hypoesthesia at the region of the lower lip was assessed bilaterally by the TSEP method. An electroencephalograph recording system (Neuropack Sigma; Nihon Koden, Tokyo, Japan) was used to analyze the potentials. Each patient was evaluated preoperatively and then postoperatively at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. Postoperative CT was performed in all cases to measure the sagittal split area (SSA) as well as the distance between the plate (the most medial point of screw) and the mental foramen (PM). Then comparisons between the 2 groups in recovery period of the lower lip, SSA, and PM were performed. Furthermore, the relationships between recovery period of hypoesthesia of the lower lip and SSA or PM were evaluated statistically. Results. The average measurable period and standard deviation of TSEP of the lower lip was 3.4 +/- 5.5 weeks in the Ob group and 11.3 +/- 13.7 weeks in the OD group. There were significant differences between the Ob group and the OD group (P < .0001). The OD group showed significantly greater SSA and PM than the Ob group (P < 0.0001). Conclusion. This study suggested that recovery period of hypoesthesia of the lower lip after SSRO was strongly associated with SSA and PM.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 15
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] Neurosensory differences after wire and rigid fixation in patients with mandibular advancement
    Lemke, RR
    Rugh, JD
    Van Sickels, J
    Bays, RA
    Clark, GM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 58 (12) : 1354 - 1359
  • [12] DEXTROMETHORPHAN FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEUROPATHIC PAIN - A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CROSSOVER TRIAL WITH INTEGRAL N-OF-1 DESIGN
    MCQUAY, HJ
    CARROLL, D
    JADAD, AR
    GLYNN, CJ
    JACK, T
    MOORE, RA
    WIFFEN, PJ
    [J]. PAIN, 1994, 59 (01) : 127 - 133
  • [13] The assessment of trigeminal sensory nerve paraesthesia after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: Modified somatosensory evoked potentials recording method
    Nakagawa, K
    Ueki, K
    Matsumoto, N
    Takatsuka, S
    Yamamoto, E
    Ooe, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 25 (02) : 97 - 101
  • [14] Trigeminal nerve hypesthesia after sagittal split osteotomy in setback cases: Correlation of postoperative computed tomography and long-term trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials
    Nakagawa, K
    Ueki, K
    Takatsuka, S
    Yamamoto, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2003, 61 (08) : 898 - 903
  • [15] Somatosensory-evoked potential to evaluate the trigeminal nerve after sagittal split osteotomy
    Nakagawa, K
    Ueki, K
    Takatsuka, S
    Takazakura, D
    Yamamoto, E
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2001, 91 (02): : 146 - 152
  • [16] Labial sensory function following sagittal split osteotomy
    Pratt, CA
    Tippett, H
    Barnard, JDW
    Birnie, DJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 34 (01) : 75 - 81
  • [17] TAKAZAKURA D, 2007, INT J ORAL MAXILLOFA
  • [18] MECHANISM OF TRANSIENT MENTAL NERVE PARESTHESIA IN SAGITTAL SPLIT MANDIBULAR RAMUS OSTEOTOMY
    TAKEUCHI, T
    FURUSAWA, K
    HIROSE, I
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 32 (02) : 105 - 108
  • [19] TRAUNER R, 1957, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, V10, P677, DOI 10.1016/S0030-4220(57)80063-2
  • [20] Computed tomographic analysis of the position and course of the mandibular canal: relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Tsuji, Y
    Muto, T
    Kawakami, J
    Takeda, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 34 (03) : 243 - 246