Run-off-road and recovery - state estimation and vehicle control strategies

被引:4
作者
Freeman, P. [1 ]
Wagner, J. [1 ]
Alexander, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Inst Global Rd Safety & Secur, Clemson, SC USA
关键词
Automotive safety; vehicle dynamics; run-off-road; nonlinear control; autonomous operation;
D O I
10.1080/00423114.2016.1200728
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Despite many advances in vehicle safety technology, traffic fatalities remain a devastating burden on society. With over two-thirds of all fatal single-vehicle crashes occurring off the roadway, run-off-road (ROR) crashes have become the focus of much roadway safety research. Current countermeasures, including roadway infrastructure modifications and some on-board vehicle safety systems, remain limited in their approach as they do not directly address the critical factor of driver behaviour. It has been shown that ROR crashes are often the result of poor driver performance leading up to the crash. In this study, the performance of two control algorithms, sliding control and linear quadratic control, was investigated for use in an autonomous ROR vehicle recovery system. The two controllers were simulated amongst a variety of ROR conditions where typical driver performance was inadequate to safely operate the vehicle. The sliding controller recovered the fastest within the nominal conditions but exhibited large variability in performance amongst the more extreme ROR scenarios. Despite some small sacrifices in lateral error and yaw rate, the linear quadratic controller demonstrated a higher level of consistency and stability amongst the various conditions examined. Overall, the linear quadratic controller recovered the vehicle 25% faster than the sliding controller while using 70% less steering, which combined with its robust performance, indicates its high potential as an autonomous ROR countermeasure.
引用
收藏
页码:1317 / 1343
页数:27
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   A comparison of alternative intervention strategies for Unintended Roadway Departure (URD) control [J].
Alleyne, A .
VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 1997, 27 (03) :157-186
[2]   Vehicle Road Runoff and Return - Effect of Limited Steering Intervention [J].
Black, Jesse ;
Wagner, John R. .
SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PASSENGER CARS-MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, 2011, 4 (01) :523-535
[3]   A video based run-off-road training program with practice and evaluation in a simulator [J].
Freeman, Paul ;
Neyens, David M. ;
Wagner, John ;
Switzer, Fred ;
Alexander, Kim ;
Pidgeon, Philip .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2015, 82 :1-9
[4]   A Comparison of Multiple Control Strategies for Vehicle Run-Off-Road and Return [J].
Freeman, Paul ;
Jensen, Matthew ;
Wagner, John ;
Alexander, Kim .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 64 (03) :901-911
[5]  
Kwakernaak H., 1972, Linear Optimal Control Systems
[6]  
Noyce D.A., 2005, INCORPORATING ROAD S
[7]  
Rajamani R., 2006, Vehicle dynamics and control
[8]   Cornering stiffness estimation based on vehicle lateral dynamics [J].
Sierra, C. ;
Tseng, E. ;
Jain, A. ;
Peng, H. .
VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2006, 44 (24-38) :24-38
[9]   Analysis of Fatal Run-Off-the-Road Crashes Involving Overcorrection [J].
Spainhour, Lisa K. ;
Mishra, Abhishek .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2008, (2069) :1-8
[10]   Dynamic estimation of road bank angle [J].
Tseng, HE .
VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2001, 36 (4-5) :307-328