Determinants of Disparities in Early COVID-19 Job Losses

被引:84
作者
Montenovo, Laura [1 ]
Jiang, Xuan [2 ]
Lozano-Rojas, Felipe [3 ]
Schmutte, Ian [4 ]
Simon, Kosali [1 ]
Weinberg, Bruce A. [5 ]
Wing, Coady [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, ONeill Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Jinan Univ, Dept Econ, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Georgia, Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Athens, GA USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Terry Coll Business, Athens, GA USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Dept Econ, Columbus, OH USA
关键词
Stratification; Economic recession; Job loss; Discrimination; Work features decomposition; UNITED-STATES; DISCRIMINATION; DECOMPOSITION;
D O I
10.1215/00703370-9961471
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study examines the sociodemographic divide in early labor market responses to the U.S. COVID-19 epidemic and associated policies, benchmarked against two previous recessions. Monthly Current Population Survey (CPS) data show greater declines in employment in April and May 2020 (relative to February) for Hispanic individuals, younger workers, and those with a high school diploma or some college. Between April and May, the demographic subgroups considered regained some employment. Reemployment in May was broadly proportional to the employment drop that occurred through April, except for Black individuals, who experienced a smaller rebound. Compared to the 2001 recession and the Great Recession, employment losses in the early COVID-19 recession were smaller for groups with low or high (vs. medium) education. We show that job loss was greater in occupations that require more interpersonal contact and that cannot be performed remotely, and that pre-COVID-19 sorting of workers into occupations and industries along demographic lines can explain a sizable portion of the demographic gaps in new unemployment. For example, while women suffered more job losses than men, their disproportionate pre-epidemic sorting into occupations compatible with remote work shielded them from even larger employment losses. However, substantial gaps in employment losses across groups cannot be explained by socioeconomic differences. We consider policy lessons and future research needs regarding the early labor market implications of the COVID-19 crisis.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 855
页数:29
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Adam-Prassl A., 2020, CAMBRIDGE INET WORKI, DOI DOI 10.17863/CAM.52477
[2]  
Albanesi Stefania., 2021, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper w28505, DOI DOI 10.3386/W28505
[3]  
Alon T. M., 2020, IMPACT COVID 19 GEND
[4]  
Angelucci Manuela, 2020, 27749 NBER
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, New York Times
[6]  
Athreya K. B., 2020, COVID 19 HOUSEHOLD 1
[7]   The polarization of the US labor market [J].
Autor, DH ;
Katz, LF ;
Kearney, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (02) :189-194
[8]  
Bartik A.W., 2020, How are small businesses adjusting to COVID-19? Early evidence from a survey (w26989)
[9]  
Blau F D., 2020, Econofact, V6, P16
[10]   WAGE DISCRIMINATION - REDUCED FORM AND STRUCTURAL ESTIMATES [J].
BLINDER, AS .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 1973, 8 (04) :436-455