Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: an Updated Systematic Review

被引:13
作者
Haider, M. A. [1 ,2 ]
Brown, J. [3 ]
Yao, X. [3 ,4 ]
Chin, J. [5 ]
Perlis, N. [6 ]
Schieda, N. [7 ]
Loblaw, A. [8 ]
机构
[1] Sinai Hlth Syst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Joint Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Ontario Hlth Canc Care Ontario, Program Evidence Based Care, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Victoria Hosp, London Hlth Sci Ctr, London, ON, Canada
[6] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Canc Clin Res Unit, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Ottawa, Dept Radiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
clinically significant; multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MPMRI); prostate cancer; systematic review; targeted biopsy; transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy (TRUS-SB); ULTRASOUND FUSION BIOPSY; GUIDED BIOPSY; NEGATIVE BIOPSY; REPEAT BIOPSY; MRI; MEN; ACCURACY; PERFORMANCE; ANTIGEN; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.clon.2021.07.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
There has been growing utilisation of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MPMRI) as a non-invasive tool to diagnose and localise clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa). This updated systematic review examines the use of MPMRI in patients with an elevated risk of CSPCa who have had a prior negative transrectal ultrasound systematic biopsy (TRUS-SB) and who were biopsy naive. MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for existing systematic reviews published up to September 2020. The literature search of the electronic databases combined disease-specific terms (prostate cancer, prostate carcinoma, etc.) and treatment-specific terms (magnetic resonance, etc.). Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MPMRI to template transperineal mapping biopsy (TPMB) or to TRUS-SB. Thirty-six RCTs were eligible. For biopsy-naive men, accuracy of diagnosis of CSPCa showed sensitivities from 87 to 96% and specificities ranging from 29 to 45%. Meta-analyses for CSPCa showed increased detection favouring MPMRI-targeted biopsy over TRUS-SB by 3% (95% confidence interval 0-7%, P = 0.03) and decreased detection of clinically insignificant prostate cancer (CISPCa) favouring MPMRI by 8% (95% confidence interval -11 to 5%, P < 0.00001). Accuracy of MPMRI for men with prior negative biopsy showed sensitivities of 78-100% and specificities of 30-100%. Meta-analyses comparing MPMRI to TRUS-SB showed increased detection of 5% (95% confidence interval 3-7%, P < 0.0001) with a reduction of CISPCa detection of 7% (95% confidence interval 4-9%, P < 0.00001). The growing acceptance of MPMRI utilisation internationally and the recent publication of several RCTs regarding MPMRI in reducing CISPCa detection rates, particularly in biopsy-naive men, without loss of sensitivity for CSPCa necessitates the synthesis of updated evidence examining MPMRI in the diagnosis of CSPCa. (C) 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E599 / E612
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
[11]   Multiparametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing repeat biopsy: a prospective comparison with clinical findings and histopathology [J].
Boesen, Lars ;
Norgaard, Nis ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Balslev, Ingegerd ;
Thomsen, Henrik S. .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2018, 59 (03) :371-380
[12]   Prospective comparison of transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion biopsy and transrectal systematic biopsy in biopsy-naive patients [J].
Borkowetz, Angelika ;
Hadaschik, Boris ;
Platzek, Ivan ;
Toma, Marieta ;
Torsev, Georgi ;
Renner, Theresa ;
Herout, Roman ;
Baunacke, Martin ;
Laniado, Michael ;
Baretton, Gustavo ;
Radtke, Jan Philipp ;
Kesch, Claudia ;
Hohenfellner, Markus ;
Froehner, Michael ;
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ;
Wirth, Manfred ;
Zastrow, Stefan .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (01) :53-60
[13]   Evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Classification in the Prediction of Tumor Aggressiveness in Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy [J].
Borkowetz, Angelika ;
Platzek, Ivan ;
Toma, Marieta ;
Renner, Theresa ;
Herout, Roman ;
Baunacke, Martin ;
Laniado, Michael ;
Baretton, Gustavo B. ;
Froehner, Michael ;
Zastrow, Stefan ;
Wirth, Manfred P. .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2017, 99 (02) :177-185
[14]   Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study [J].
Brown, Louise Clare ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Faria, Rita ;
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Kaplan, Richard S. ;
Parmar, Mahesh ;
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda ;
Ward, Katie ;
Hindley, Richard Graham ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alexander ;
Oldroyd, Robert ;
Parker, Chris ;
Bott, Simon ;
Burns-Cox, Nick ;
Dudderidge, Tim ;
Ghei, Maneesh ;
Henderson, Alastair ;
Persad, Rajendra ;
Rosario, Derek J. ;
Shergill, Iqbal ;
Winkler, Mathias ;
Soares, Marta ;
Spackman, Eldon ;
Sculpher, Mark ;
Emberton, Mark .
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2018, 22 (39) :1-+
[15]   Prospective nonrandomized study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent MRI-guided biopsy in biopsy-naive patients [J].
Castellucci, Roberto ;
Linares Quevedo, Ana I. ;
Sanchez Gomez, Francisco J. ;
Diez Rodriguez, Jesus ;
Cogorno, Leopoldo ;
Cogollos Acuna, Isidro ;
Salmeron Beliz, Isabel ;
Fernandez de Legaria, Marta Munoz ;
Martinez Pineiro, Luis .
MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2017, 69 (06) :589-595
[16]   Real-time Contrast-enhanced Transrectal US-guided Prostate Biopsy: Diagnostic Accuracy in Men with Previously Negative Biopsy Results and Positive MR Imaging Findings [J].
Cornelis, Francois ;
Rigou, Gerald ;
Le Bras, Yann ;
Coutouly, Xavier ;
Hubrecht, Regis ;
Yacoub, Mokrane ;
Pasticier, Gilles ;
Robert, Gregoire ;
Grenier, Nicolas .
RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (01) :159-166
[17]   Diagnosis of relevant prostate cancer using supplementary cores from magnetic resonance imaging-prompted areas following multiple failed biopsies [J].
Costa, Daniel N. ;
Bloch, B. Nicolas ;
Yao, David F. ;
Sanda, Martin G. ;
Ngo, Long ;
Genega, Elizabeth M. ;
Pedrosa, Ivan ;
DeWolf, William C. ;
Rofsky, Neil M. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 31 (06) :947-952
[18]   Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate Cancer Detection: Comparison of Random and Targeted Biopsies [J].
Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry ;
Peyromaure, Michael ;
Schull, Alexandre ;
Beuvon, Frederic ;
Bouazza, Naim ;
Flam, Thierry ;
Zerbib, Marc ;
Muradyan, Naira ;
Legman, Paul ;
Cornud, Francois .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (02) :493-499
[19]  
EAU Guidelines, 2019, EAU ANN C MIL
[20]   Is There Still a Need for Repeated Systematic Biopsies in Patients with Previous Negative Biopsies in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies of the Prostate? [J].
Exterkate, Leonie ;
Wegelin, Olivier ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
van der Leest, Marloes G. ;
Kummer, J. Alain ;
Vreuls, Willem ;
de Bruin, Peter C. ;
Bosch, J. L. H. Ruud ;
van Melick, Harm H. E. ;
Somford, Diederik M. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (02) :216-223