Long-term outcomes of status epilepticus: A critical assessment

被引：95
作者：
Sculier, Claudine [1 ,2 ]
Gainza-Lein, Marina [1 ,3 ]
Sanchez Fernandez, Ivan [1 ,4 ]
Loddenkemper, Tobias [1 ]
机构：
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Neurol, Div Epilepsy & Clin Neurophysiol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Free Univ Brussels, Erasmus Hosp, Dept Neurol, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Austral Chile, Fac Med, Valdivia, Chile
[4] Univ Barcelona, Hosp St Joan de Deu, Dept Child Neurol, Barcelona, Spain
来源：
EPILEPSIA | 2018年 / 59卷
关键词：
cognitive outcome; epilepsy; functional impairment; mortality; neurological sequelae; quality of life; CONVULSIVE STATUS EPILEPTICUS; REFRACTORY STATUS EPILEPTICUS; PEDIATRIC STATUS EPILEPTICUS; INTENSIVE-CARE; UNPROVOKED SEIZURE; EPILEPSY PATIENTS; LOW MORBIDITY; FOLLOW-UP; CHILDREN; MORTALITY;
D O I：
10.1111/epi.14515
中图分类号：
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号：
摘要：
We reviewed 37 studies reporting long-term outcomes after a status epilepticus (SE) episode in pediatric and adult populations. Study design, length of follow-up, outcome measures, domains investigated (mortality, SE recurrence, subsequent epilepsy, cognitive outcome, functional outcome, or quality of life), and predictors of long-term outcomes are summarized. Despite heterogeneity in the design of prior studies, overall risk of poor long-term outcome after SE is high in both children and adults. Etiology is the main determinant of outcome, and the effect of age or SE duration is often difficult to distinguish from the underlying cause. The effect of the treatment on long-term outcome after SE is still unknown.
引用
收藏
页码：155 / 169
页数：15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Assessment and significance of long-term outcomes in surgery [J].
Usselstijn, Hanneke ;
Gischler, Saskia J. ;
Wijnen, Rene M. H. ;
Tibboel, Dick .
SEMINARS IN PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2017, 26 (05) :281-285
[32]   Long-Term Function After Pediatric Critical Illness: Results From the Survivor Outcomes Study [J].
Pinto, Neethi P. ;
Rhinesmith, Elizabeth W. ;
Kim, Tae Yeon ;
Ladner, Peter H. ;
Pollack, Murray M. .
PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 18 (03) :E122-E130
[33]   Long-term outcomes and healthcare utilization following critical illness - a population-based study [J].
Hill, A. D. ;
Fowler, R. A. ;
Pinto, R. ;
Herridge, M. S. ;
Cuthbertson, B. H. ;
Scales, D. C. .
CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 20
[34]   New onset status epilepticus and its long-term outcome: A cohort study [J].
Adiga, Sharath ;
Mundlamuri, Ravindranadh Chowdary ;
Asranna, Ajay ;
Vishwanathan, Lakshminarayanapuram Gopal ;
Raghavendra, Kenchaiah ;
Nanjaiah, Nandakumar Dalavaikodihalli ;
Prathyusah, Pv ;
Kulanthaivelu, Karthik ;
Sinha, Sanjib .
EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2024, 206
[35]   Long-term survival in patients with status epilepticus: A tertiary referral center study [J].
Ristic, Aleksandar J. ;
Sokic, Dragoslav V. ;
Trajkovic, Goran ;
Jankovic, Slavko ;
Vojvodic, Nikola M. ;
Bascarevic, Vladimir ;
Popovic, Ljubica M. .
EPILEPSIA, 2010, 51 (01) :57-61
[36]   Nonconvulsive status epilepticus after convulsive status epilepticus: Clinical features, outcomes, and prognostic factors [J].
Yuan, Fang ;
Yang, Fang ;
Li, Wen ;
Yang, Xiai ;
Gao, Qiong ;
Bi, Lijie ;
Jiang, Yongli ;
Jiang, Wen .
EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2018, 142 :53-57
[37]   Salzburg consensus criteria are associated with long-term outcome after non-convulsive status epilepticus [J].
Monsson, Olav S. ;
Roberg, Lars E. ;
Gesche, Joanna ;
Beier, Christoph P. ;
Kroigard, Thomas .
SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2022, 99 :28-35
[38]   Episodes of status epilepticus in young adults: Etiologic factors, subtypes, and outcomes [J].
Ozdilek, Betul ;
Midi, Ipek ;
Agan, Kadriye ;
Bingol, Canan Aykut .
EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2013, 27 (02) :351-354
[39]   The puzzle of long-term morbidity after critical illness [J].
Wunsch, Hannah ;
Angus, Derek C. .
CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 14 (01)
[40]   Perceived Stress in Myocardial Infarction Long-Term Mortality and Health Status Outcomes [J].
Arnold, Suzanne V. ;
Smolderen, Kim G. ;
Buchanan, Donna M. ;
Li, Yan ;
Spertus, John A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (18) :1756-1763
12345