Measuring What Matters: Top-Ranked Quality Indicators for Hospice and Palliative Care From the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association

被引:188
作者
Dy, Sydney Morss [1 ]
Kiley, Kasey B. [2 ]
Ast, Katherine [3 ]
Lupu, Dale [3 ]
Norton, Sally A. [4 ]
McMillan, Susan C. [5 ]
Herr, Keela [6 ]
Rotella, Joseph D. [7 ]
Casarett, David J. [8 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Canc Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Amer Acad Hosp & Palliat Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ Rochester, Sch Nursing, Rochester, NY USA
[5] Univ S Florida, Coll Nursing, Tampa, FL USA
[6] Univ Iowa, Coll Nursing, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[7] Hosparus, Louisville, KY USA
[8] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Palliative care; pain measurement; hospice care; quality of health care; quality indicators; advance care planning; patient satisfaction; OF-LIFE CARE; HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS; CANCER CARE; END; PERSPECTIVES; FEASIBILITY; VALIDITY; FEEDBACK; SET;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.01.012
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. Measuring quality of hospice and palliative care is critical for evaluating and improving care, but no standard U.S. quality indicator set exists. Objectives. The Measuring What Matters (MWM) project aimed to recommend a concise portfolio of valid, clinically relevant, cross-cutting indicators for internal measurement of hospice and palliative care. Methods. The MWM process was a sequential consensus project of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM) and Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association (HPNA). We identified candidate indicators mapped to National Consensus Project (NCP) Palliative Care Guidelines domains. We narrowed the list through a modified Delphi rating process by a Technical Advisory Panel and Clinical User Panel and ratings from AAHPM and HPNA membership and key organizations. Results. We narrowed the initial 75 indicators to a final list of 10. These include one in the NCP domain Structure and Process (Comprehensive Assessment), three in Physical Aspects (Screening for Physical Symptoms, Pain Treatment, and Dyspnea Screening and Management), one in Psychological and Psychiatric Aspects (Discussion of Emotional or Psychological Needs), one in Spiritual and Existential Aspects (Discussion of Spiritual/Religious Concerns), and three in Ethical and Legal Aspects (Documentation of Surrogate, Treatment Preferences, and Care Consistency with Documented Care Preferences). The list also recommends a global indicator of patient/family perceptions of care, but does not endorse a specific survey instrument. Conclusion. This consensus set of hospice and palliative care quality indicators is a foundation for standard, valid internal quality measurement for U.S. settings. Further development will assemble implementation tools for quality measurement and benchmarking. (C) 2015 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 781
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care, V4th
  • [2] Advancing Performance Measurement in Oncology: Quality Oncology Practice Initiative Participation and Quality Outcomes
    Campion, Francis X.
    Larson, Leanne R.
    Kadlubek, Pamela J.
    Earle, Craig C.
    Neuss, Michael N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2011, 7 (03) : 31S - 35S
  • [3] Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, HOSP QUAL REP
  • [4] Measuring Relatives' Perspectives on the Quality of Palliative Care: The Consumer Quality Index Palliative Care
    Claessen, Susanne J. J.
    Francke, Anneke L.
    Sixma, Herman J.
    de Veer, Anke J. E.
    Deliens, Luc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2013, 45 (05) : 875 - 884
  • [5] Family evaluation of hospice care: Results from voluntary submission of data via website
    Connor, SR
    Teno, J
    Spence, C
    Smith, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2005, 30 (01) : 9 - 17
  • [6] Measuring hospice care: The national hospice and palliative care organization national hospice data set
    Connor, SR
    Tecca, M
    LundPerson, J
    Teno, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2004, 28 (04) : 316 - 328
  • [7] Improving national hospice/palliative care service symptom outcomes systematically through point-of-care data collection, structured feedback and benchmarking
    Currow, David C.
    Allingham, Samuel
    Yates, Patsy
    Johnson, Claire
    Clark, Katherine
    Eagar, Kathy
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2015, 23 (02) : 307 - 315
  • [8] Dy SM, 2012, AHRQ PUBLICATION, V12(13)-E014-EF
  • [9] Cancer Quality-ASSIST Supportive Oncology Quality Indicator Set Feasibility, Reliability, and Validity Testing
    Dy, Sydney M.
    Lorenz, Karl A.
    ONeill, Sean M.
    Asch, Steven M.
    Walling, Anne M.
    Tisnado, Diana
    Antonio, Anna Liza
    Malin, Jennifer L.
    [J]. CANCER, 2010, 116 (13) : 3267 - 3275
  • [10] Identifying potential indicators of the quality of end-of-life cancer care from administrative data
    Earle, CC
    Park, ER
    Lai, B
    Weeks, JC
    Ayanian, JZ
    Block, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (06) : 1133 - 1138