Different infill geometry influence on mechanical properties of FDM produced PLA

被引:14
作者
Bergonzi, L. [1 ]
Vettori, M. [1 ]
Stefanini, L. [2 ]
D'Alcamo, L. [2 ]
机构
[1] MaCh3D Srl, V Le Duca Alessandro 42, I-43121 Parma, Italy
[2] Fdn ITS Maker, Via Sario Bassanelli 9-1, I-40129 Bologna, Italy
来源
49TH ITALIAN ASSOCIATION FOR STRESS ANALYSIS CONFERENCE (AIAS 2020) | 2021年 / 1038卷
关键词
PROCESS PARAMETERS; TENSILE; TEMPERATURE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1088/1757-899X/1038/1/012071
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) is one of the most widespread additive manufacturing technologies due to its relatively low cost and simplicity. Usually, printed parts have an internal structure (infill) that is not produced with 100% material density. This strategy is adopted to save material and time thanks also to the fact that when a component is loaded, stress are concentrated on its skin rather than in the internal section. Furthermore, infill structure can have different densities and topology. Slicer software have various configurations that can be exploited to produce internal structures: according to All3DP [1], some are intended for functional parts while others are more indicated to prototypes only. Aim of this work, is to compare the effect of different infill topologies produced using Ultimaker CURA [2] slicing software on material mechanical properties. Preliminary experimental activity has been carried out in order to determine the most suitable printing temperature. MaCh3D, an innovative miniaturized universal testing machine [3] was used to perform uniaxial tensile tests. Results underline the difference between different kind of infill in term of mechanical properties, given the same infill density across all specimens. Additionally, in order to evaluate infill percentage effect on mechanical properties, some of the most performing infill from the characterisation activity have been selected and specimens produced with 20%, 50%, 80% infill percentage. In the end, both infill topology as well as density impacts on mechanical properties.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Alsoufi M.S., 2019, American Journal of Mechanical Engineering, V7, P45, DOI [DOI 10.12691/AJME, 10.12691/ajme-7-2-1, DOI 10.12691/AJME-7-2-1]
[2]   Investigating the influence of infill percentage on the mechanical properties of fused deposition modelled ABS parts [J].
Alvarez C, Kenny L. ;
Lagos C, Rodrigo F. ;
Aizpun, Miguel .
INGENIERIA E INVESTIGACION, 2016, 36 (03) :110-116
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ALL3DPCOM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Stainless, Heat-Resisting, Maraging, and Other Similar Chromium-Nickel-Iron Alloys, DOI DOI 10.1520/D0638-14
[5]  
[Anonymous], B3D ONLINE
[6]   Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling [J].
Bellini, A ;
Güçeri, S .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2003, 9 (04) :252-264
[7]   Numerical and experimental validation of a non-standard specimen for uniaxial tensile test [J].
Bergonzi, Lorenzo ;
Vettori, Matteo ;
Pirondi, Alessandro ;
Moroni, Fabrizio ;
Musiari, Francesco .
AIAS 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRESS ANALYSIS, 2018, 12 :392-403
[8]   Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection [J].
Chacon, J. M. ;
Caminero, M. A. ;
Garcia-Plaza, E. ;
Nunez, P. J. .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2017, 124 :143-157
[9]   Estimation of filament temperature and adhesion development in fused deposition techniques [J].
Costa, S. F. ;
Duarte, F. M. ;
Covas, J. A. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 245 :167-179
[10]  
Crump S.S., 1991, ASME ANN WINTER C AT, V50, P53