Effect of Tariff Policy and Battery Degradation on Optimal Energy Storage

被引:9
作者
Corengia, Mariana [1 ]
Torres, Ana I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Republica, Inst Ingn Quim, Fac Ingn, Montevideo 11300, Uruguay
来源
PROCESSES | 2018年 / 6卷 / 10期
关键词
demand response; energy management; energy storage; optimal battery operation; battery degradation; REDUCED-ORDER MODEL; INTEGRATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/pr6100204
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In the context of an increasing participation of renewable energy in the electricity market, demand response is a strategy promoted by electricity companies to balance the non-programmable supply of electricity with its usage. Through the use of differential electricity prices, a switch in energy consumption patterns is stimulated. In recent years, energy self-storage in batteries has been proposed as a way to take advantage of differential prices without a major disruption in daily routines. Although a promising solution, charge and discharge cycles also degrade batteries, thus expected savings in the energy bill may actually be non-existent if these savings are counterbalanced by the capacity lost by the battery. In this work a convex optimization problem that finds the operating schedule for a battery and includes the effects of current-induced degradation is presented. The goal is to have a tool that facilitates for a consumer the evaluation of the convenience of installing a battery-based energy storage system under different but given assumptions of electricity and battery prices. The problem is solved assuming operation of a commercial Li-ion under two very different yet representative electricity pricing policies.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal battery storage operation for PV systems with tariff incentives
    Hassan, Abubakar Sani
    Cipcigan, Liana
    Jenkins, Nick
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 203 : 422 - 441
  • [2] Optimal Operation of Energy Storage Systems Considering Forecasts and Battery Degradation
    Abdulla K.
    De Hoog J.
    Muenzel V.
    Suits F.
    Steer K.
    Wirth A.
    Halgamuge S.
    2018, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., United States (09) : 2086 - 2096
  • [3] Battery Energy Storage Models for Optimal Control
    Rosewater, David M.
    Copp, David A.
    Nguyen, Tu A.
    Byrne, Raymond H.
    Santoso, Surya
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 178357 - 178391
  • [4] Optimal Daily Scheduling of Distributed Battery Energy Storage Systems Considering Battery Degradation Cost
    Chai, Qingmian
    Zhang, Cuo
    Dong, ZhaoYang
    Chen, Wen
    2021 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING (PESGM), 2021,
  • [5] Optimal Sizing of Battery Energy Storage Systems Considering Degradation Effect for Operating and Electricity Cost Minimization in Microgrids
    Vaka, Srinivas Sandeep Kumar Reddy
    Sailaja Kumari, Matam
    ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [6] Optimal configuration and operation for user-side energy storage considering lithium-ion battery degradation
    Chen, Zheng
    Li, Zhenyu
    Chen, Guozhu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2023, 145
  • [7] Optimal Scheduling of Grid Connected Solar Photovoltaic and Battery Storage System Considering Degradation Cost of Battery
    Kumar, Jitendra
    Kumar, Nagendra
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 46 (04) : 1175 - 1188
  • [8] Optimal energy management of battery with high wind energy penetration: A comprehensive linear battery degradation cost model
    Amini, Mohammad
    Nazari, Mohammad Hassan
    Hosseinian, Seyed Hossein
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 93
  • [9] Residential Tariff Structure and Battery Energy Storage Impact in Queensland LV Network
    du Plessis, Christopher
    Walker, Geoffrey R.
    Pezeshki, Houman
    2015 IEEE PES ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2015,
  • [10] Stochastic Optimal Planning of Battery Energy Storage Systems for Isolated Microgrids
    Alharbi, Hisham
    Bhattacharya, Kankar
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2018, 9 (01) : 211 - 227