Comparisons of spatial and non-spatial models for predicting soil carbon content based on visible and near-infrared spectral technology

被引:52
作者
Guo, Long [1 ]
Zhao, Chang [2 ]
Zhang, Haitao [1 ]
Chen, Yiyun [3 ,4 ,6 ]
Linderman, M. [2 ]
Zhang, Qing [1 ]
Liu, Yaolin [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Iowa, Geog & Sustainabil Sci, Iowa City, IA 52246 USA
[3] Wuhan Univ, Suzhou Inst, Suzhou 215123, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[5] Wuhan Univ, Collaborat Innovat Platform Geospatial Informat T, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[6] Wuhan Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Geog Informat Syst, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Spatial dependence; Partial least squares regression; Spatial model's; Visible and near-infrared diffuse reflectance; spectroscopy; GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION; DIFFUSE-REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY; LEAST-SQUARE REGRESSION; ORGANIC-CARBON; TOTAL NITROGEN; MATTER; INTERPOLATION; CONTAMINATION; VARIABILITY; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.10.010
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Visible and near-infrared (VNIR) reflectance spectroscopy is a rapid, non-destructive, and cost-effective method for predicting soil properties. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) is a common method used to predict soil properties based on VNIR reflectance spectra. However, PLSR ignores the spatial autocorrelation of soil properties and the assumption of linear regression models, in which explanatory variables and model residuals should be independently and identically distributed. In this study, PLSR, partial least squares-geographically weighted regression (PLS-GWR), partial least squares regression Kriging (PLSRK), and partial least squares-geographically weighted regression Kriging (PLS-GWRK) were constructed to predict soil organic matter (SOM) based on soil spectral reflectance. In addition, this study explores the influence of the spatial non-stationarity of explanatory variables on prediction accuracy. Among the aforementioned models, PISA was used as a reference model; PLS-GWR considered the spatial autocorrelation of SOM and its auxiliary variables; PLSRK and PLS-GWRK considered the spatial dependence of the model residuals to ensure the usability of PLSR and PLS-GWR. A total of 256 topsoil samples (0-30 cm) were collected from Chahe Town, located in Jianghan Plain, China, and the reflectance spectra (400-2350 nm) of soil were used. The prediction capabilities of the models were evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R-2), the root-mean-square error (RMSE), and the ratio of performance to inter-quartile range (RPIQ). The evaluation indices showed that PLS-GWRK was the optimal model for predicting SOM using VNIR spectra. PLS-GWRK has the lowest values of RMSEC [0.109 In (g.kg(-1))] and RMSEP [0.223 In (g.kg(-1))] and the highest values of R-C(2) (0.933), R-P(2) (0.653), and RPIQ (3.015). PLS-GWR result showed that the spatial dependence of SOM and principal components could improve prediction accuracy compared with the PLSR result The result of PLSRK showed that the spatial dependence of the model residuals could influence the prediction accuracy of PLSR. The PLS-GWRK approach explicitly addressed the spatial dependency and spatial non-stationarity issues for interpolating SOM at regional scale. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 292
页数:13
相关论文
共 61 条
[31]  
Lyell S.C., 1989, PRINCIPLES GEOLOGY, V1
[32]  
Martens H., 1989, MULTIVARIATE CALIBRA
[33]   Evaluation of modelling approaches for predicting the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stocks at the national scale [J].
Martin, M. P. ;
Orton, T. G. ;
Lacarce, E. ;
Meersmans, J. ;
Saby, N. P. A. ;
Paroissien, J. B. ;
Jolivet, C. ;
Boulonne, L. ;
Arrouays, D. .
GEODERMA, 2014, 223 :97-107
[34]  
Matheron G., 1963, Economic Geology, V58, P1246, DOI [10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246, DOI 10.2113/GSECONGEO.58.8.1246]
[35]   Mid-infrared and near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for soil carbon measurement [J].
McCarty, GW ;
Reeves, JB ;
Reeves, VB ;
Follett, RF ;
Kimble, JM .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2002, 66 (02) :640-646
[36]   Prediction of soil organic carbon content by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy using a local partial least square regression approach [J].
Nocita, Marco ;
Stevens, Antoine ;
Toth, Gergely ;
Panagos, Panos ;
van Wesemael, Bas ;
Montanarella, Luca .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2014, 68 :337-347
[37]  
Overstreet L.F., 2009, IMPORTANCE SOIL ORGA, P1273
[38]   ANALYSIS OF FACTORS CONTROLLING SOIL ORGANIC-MATTER LEVELS IN GREAT-PLAINS GRASSLANDS [J].
PARTON, WJ ;
SCHIMEL, DS ;
COLE, CV ;
OJIMA, DS .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1987, 51 (05) :1173-1179
[39]   Estimating Soil Organic Carbon Using VIS/NIR Spectroscopy with SVMR and SPA Methods [J].
Peng, Xiaoting ;
Shi, Tiezhu ;
Song, Aihong ;
Chen, Yiyun ;
Gao, Wenxiu .
REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 6 (04) :2699-2717
[40]   Review of the most common pre-processing techniques for near-infrared spectra [J].
Rinnan, Asmund ;
van den Berg, Frans ;
Engelsen, Soren Balling .
TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 28 (10) :1201-1222