Effective Public Participation is Fundamental for Marine Conservation-Lessons from a Large-Scale MPA

被引:44
作者
Day, Jon C. [1 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Australian Res Council, Ctr Excellence Coral Reef Studies, Townsville, Qld, Australia
关键词
environmental decision-making; great barrier reef; marine planning; public engagement; stakeholders; STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT; CONTINUED INFLUENCE; PLANNING PROCESS; PROTECTED AREAS; ENGAGEMENT; POLICY; MISINFORMATION; INFORMATION; CHALLENGES; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1080/08920753.2017.1373452
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Representative Areas Program (RAP) was, at the time, the most comprehensive process of community involvement and participatory planning for any environmental issue in Australia. The RAP was a key component of the widely acclaimed rezoning of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, and although completed in 2003, many lessons learned are still relevant today. This paper provides an analysis of the comprehensive public participation program that significantly influenced the final planning outcome. It provides insights into a fundamental component of effective marine planning, assessing what worked well and what did not in terms of public engagement. Some aspects of the public participation program were innovative, and some were more effective than others. The outcome was one-third of the Marine Park was declared as highly protected no-take zones in 2004, with the remainder of the park also zoned to provide lower levels of protection. The methods used to engage the public and the 25 lessons discussed in this paper should be of interest for practitioners, policy makers and academics elsewhere aiming for "good practice" approaches to achieve environmental conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 486
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, At what price? The economic, social and icon value of the Great Barrier Reef
[2]   Participation and societal values: the challenge for lawmakers and policy practitioners [J].
Appelstrand, M .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2002, 4 (04) :281-290
[3]  
Backstrand K., 2003, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V3, P24
[4]  
Beierle TC, 2000, J POLICY ANAL MANAG, V19, P587, DOI 10.1002/1520-6688(200023)19:4<587::AID-PAM4>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-Q
[6]  
Bradshaw GA, 2000, CONSERV ECOL, V4
[7]   Designing Public Participation Processes [J].
Bryson, John M. ;
Quick, Kathryn S. ;
Slotterback, Carissa Schively ;
Crosby, Barbara C. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2013, 73 (01) :23-34
[8]  
Bull R., 2007, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V51, P701
[9]   Keeping the public informed? Public negotiation of air quality information [J].
Bush, J ;
Moffatt, S ;
Dunn, CE .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2001, 10 (02) :213-229
[10]  
Christensen J., 2004, Conservation in Practice, V5, P12, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1526-4629.2004.TB00079.X, 10.1111/j.1526-4629.2004.tb00079.x]