Methadone is superior to fentanyl in treating neuropathic pain in patients with head-and-neck cancer

被引:58
作者
Haumann, J. [1 ,2 ]
Geurts, J. W. [1 ]
van Kuijk, S. M. J. [3 ]
Kremer, B. [4 ]
Joosten, E. A. [1 ,5 ]
van den Beuken-van Everdingen, M. H. J. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Univ Pain Ctr Maastricht UPCM, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] OLVG, Dept Anaesthesiol & Pain Management, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Med Technol Assessment, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, GROW Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Sch Mental Hlth & Neurosci, Dept Translat Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr MUMC, Ctr Expertise Palliat Care, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Methadone; Fentanyl; Head-and-neck cancer; Cancer pain; NMDA receptor antagonist; CLINICAL IMPORTANCE; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; ORAL METHADONE; MORPHINE; VALIDATION; VERSION; ANTAGONISTS; ROTATION; KETAMINE; RECEPTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2016.06.025
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Cancer pain is still inadequately treated in up to 60% of cancer patients. Based on the additional effect on the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor, we expected that methadone (Met) could provide better pain relief than fentanyl (Fen) in cancer pain with a neuropathic pain component. Methods: A randomised controlled trial was performed with 52 strong opioids naive patients with head-and-neck cancer with substantial pain (pain Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] > 4) and a neuropathic pain component (Douleur Neuropathique [DN4] > 4). Twenty-six patients were treated with Met and 26 with Fen. Patients were evaluated at 1, 3 and 5 weeks. The primary outcomes were reduction in average pain, clinical success (defined as 50% average pain decrease) and reduction in pain interference. Secondary outcomes were global perceived effect (GPE) and side-effects. Findings: Reduction in NRS was higher with the use of Met at 1, 3 and 5 weeks (pain change 2.9, 3.1 and 3.1) compared to Fen (1.4, 1.7 and 2.0). This difference was significant at 1 (p = 0.011) and at 3 weeks (p = 0.03). Clinical success (> 50% improvement) was higher with Met at 1 week (15% versus 50%, p = 0.012). The change in pain interference, the GPE and side-effect profile were not significantly different between the groups. Interpretation: This is the first study to compare the effects of Met to Fen in cancer patients with a neuropathic pain component. Based on the results of this study, Met should be considered in the treatment of oncological pain with a neuropathic component. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 129
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT for head-and-neck cancer
    Chao, KSC
    Ozyigit, G
    Tran, BN
    Cengiz, M
    Dempsey, JF
    Low, DA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 55 (02): : 312 - 321
  • [42] Affective Symptoms and Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
    Iris Krebbers
    Walmari Pilz
    Sophie Vanbelle
    Rob J. C. G. Verdonschot
    Laura W. J. Baijens
    Dysphagia, 2023, 38 : 127 - 144
  • [43] Cigarette-smoking characteristics and interest in cessation in patients with head-and-neck cancer
    Conlon, M. S. C.
    Santi, S. A.
    Meigs, M. L.
    Davidson, S. M.
    Saunders, D.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (05) : E478 - E485
  • [44] Nutritional Risk Screening in head-and-neck cancer patients prior to oncological therapy
    Lehner, Uta
    Zaretsky, Eugen
    Goeze, Almut
    Wermter, Laura
    Birk, Richard
    Neff, Andreas
    Fisher, Ingo
    Ghanaati, Shahram
    Daffner, Anna
    Sader, Robert
    Hey, Christiane
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2022, 101 (08) : 652 - 659
  • [45] Influence of pain severity on the quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer before antineoplastic therapy
    Oliveira, Karine G.
    von Zeidler, Sandra V.
    Podesta, Jose R. V.
    Sena, Agenor
    Souza, Evandro D.
    Lenzi, Jeferson
    Bissoli, Nazare S.
    Gouvea, Sonia A.
    BMC CANCER, 2014, 14
  • [46] FRACTIONATED STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOR REIRRADIATION OF HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER
    Unger, Keith R.
    Lominska, Christopher E.
    Deeken, John F.
    Davidson, Bruce J.
    Newkirk, Kenneth A.
    Gagnon, Gregory J.
    Hwang, Jimmy
    Slack, Rebecca S.
    Noone, Anne-Michelle
    Harter, K. William
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (05): : 1411 - 1419
  • [47] Health care delivery for head-and-neck cancer patients in Alberta: a practice guideline
    Harris, J. R.
    Lau, H.
    Surgeoner, B. V.
    Chua, N.
    Dobrovolsky, W.
    Dort, J. C.
    Kalaydjian, E.
    Nesbitt, M.
    Scrimger, R. A.
    Seikaly, H.
    Skarsgard, D.
    Webster, M. A.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (05) : E704 - E714
  • [48] Diagnosis of head-and-neck cancer from exhaled breath
    Hakim, M.
    Billan, S.
    Tisch, U.
    Peng, G.
    Dvrokind, I.
    Marom, O.
    Abdah-Bortnyak, R.
    Kuten, A.
    Haick, H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 104 (10) : 1649 - 1655
  • [49] ADAPTIVE DOSE PAINTING BY NUMBERS FOR HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER
    Duprez, Frederic
    De Neve, Wilfried
    De Gersem, Werner
    Coghe, Marc
    Madani, Indira
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (04): : 1045 - 1055
  • [50] Radiochemotherapy-related Lymphopenia in Head-and-Neck Cancer
    Erdogan, Mihriban
    Parvizi, Murtaza
    Guzeloz, Zeliha
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 38 (03): : 382 - 391