Methadone is superior to fentanyl in treating neuropathic pain in patients with head-and-neck cancer

被引:58
作者
Haumann, J. [1 ,2 ]
Geurts, J. W. [1 ]
van Kuijk, S. M. J. [3 ]
Kremer, B. [4 ]
Joosten, E. A. [1 ,5 ]
van den Beuken-van Everdingen, M. H. J. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Univ Pain Ctr Maastricht UPCM, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] OLVG, Dept Anaesthesiol & Pain Management, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Med Technol Assessment, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, GROW Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Sch Mental Hlth & Neurosci, Dept Translat Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr MUMC, Ctr Expertise Palliat Care, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Methadone; Fentanyl; Head-and-neck cancer; Cancer pain; NMDA receptor antagonist; CLINICAL IMPORTANCE; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; ORAL METHADONE; MORPHINE; VALIDATION; VERSION; ANTAGONISTS; ROTATION; KETAMINE; RECEPTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2016.06.025
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Cancer pain is still inadequately treated in up to 60% of cancer patients. Based on the additional effect on the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor, we expected that methadone (Met) could provide better pain relief than fentanyl (Fen) in cancer pain with a neuropathic pain component. Methods: A randomised controlled trial was performed with 52 strong opioids naive patients with head-and-neck cancer with substantial pain (pain Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] > 4) and a neuropathic pain component (Douleur Neuropathique [DN4] > 4). Twenty-six patients were treated with Met and 26 with Fen. Patients were evaluated at 1, 3 and 5 weeks. The primary outcomes were reduction in average pain, clinical success (defined as 50% average pain decrease) and reduction in pain interference. Secondary outcomes were global perceived effect (GPE) and side-effects. Findings: Reduction in NRS was higher with the use of Met at 1, 3 and 5 weeks (pain change 2.9, 3.1 and 3.1) compared to Fen (1.4, 1.7 and 2.0). This difference was significant at 1 (p = 0.011) and at 3 weeks (p = 0.03). Clinical success (> 50% improvement) was higher with Met at 1 week (15% versus 50%, p = 0.012). The change in pain interference, the GPE and side-effect profile were not significantly different between the groups. Interpretation: This is the first study to compare the effects of Met to Fen in cancer patients with a neuropathic pain component. Based on the results of this study, Met should be considered in the treatment of oncological pain with a neuropathic component. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 129
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improved immobilization using an individual head support in head-and-neck cancer patients
    Houweling, Antonetta C.
    van der Meer, Skadi
    van der Wal, Edwin
    Terhaard, Chris H. J.
    Raaijmakers, Cornelis P. J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 (01) : 100 - 103
  • [22] Prevalence and Risk Factors of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Newly Diagnosed Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients
    Florie, Michelle G. M. H.
    Wieland, Monse W. M.
    Pilz, Walmari
    Partoens, Rosanne
    Winkens, Bjorn
    Hoeben, Ann
    Rommel, Nathalie
    Baijens, Laura W. J.
    CANCERS, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [23] THE ROLE OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF THE NECK AFTER CHEMORADIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER
    Clavel, Sebastien
    Charron, Marie-Pierre
    Belair, Manon
    Delouya, Guila
    Fortin, Bernard
    Despres, Philippe
    Soulieres, Denis
    Filion, Edith
    Guertin, Louis
    Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (02): : 567 - 573
  • [24] Efficacy of postoperative pain management in head and neck cancer patients
    Hinther, Ashley
    Nakoneshny, Steven C.
    Chandarana, Shamir P.
    Matthews, T. Wayne
    Dort, Joseph C.
    JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2018, 47
  • [25] Dysphagia, voice problems, and pain in head and neck cancer patients
    Zebralla, Veit
    Wichmann, Gunnar
    Pirlich, Markus
    Hammermueller, Carola
    Berger, Thomas
    Zimmermann, Klara
    Neumuth, Thomas
    Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Anja
    Dietz, Andreas
    Hinz, Andreas
    Wiegand, Susanne
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 278 (10) : 3985 - 3994
  • [26] Dysphagia, voice problems, and pain in head and neck cancer patients
    Veit Zebralla
    Gunnar Wichmann
    Markus Pirlich
    Carola Hammermüller
    Thomas Berger
    Klara Zimmermann
    Thomas Neumuth
    Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
    Andreas Dietz
    Andreas Hinz
    Susanne Wiegand
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2021, 278 : 3985 - 3994
  • [27] Molecular Profiling for Predictors of Radiosensitivity in Patients with Breast or Head-and-Neck Cancer
    Drobin, Kimi
    Marczyk, Michal
    Halle, Martin
    Danielsson, Daniel
    Papiez, Anna
    Sangsuwan, Traimate
    Bendes, Annika
    Hong, Mun-Gwan
    Qundos, Ulrika
    Harms-Ringdahl, Mats
    Wersall, Peter
    Polanska, Joanna
    Schwenk, Jochen M.
    Haghdoost, Siamak
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [28] Prognosticators for Quality of Life in Surgically Treated Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients
    Gupta, Neeti Kapre
    Jani, Shripal
    Dubey, Priya
    Fidvi, Zainab
    Kapre, Madan
    JOURNAL OF HEAD & NECK PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, 2020, 8 (02): : 129 - 133
  • [29] Transdermal fentanyl in the long-term treatment of cancer pain: A prospective study of 50 patients with advanced cancer of the gastrointestinal tract or the head and neck region
    Grond, S
    Zech, D
    Lehmann, KA
    Radbruch, L
    Breitenbach, H
    Hertel, D
    PAIN, 1997, 69 (1-2) : 191 - 198
  • [30] A pilot study to improve pain phenotyping in head and neck cancer patients
    Ye, Yi
    Cardoso, Diovana de Melo
    Kayahara, Giseli Mitsuy
    Bernabe, Daniel Galera
    FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH, 2023, 4