Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing in livestock species for individual traceability and parentage testing

被引:1
|
作者
Casellas, Joaquim [1 ]
de Hijas-Villalba, Melani Martin [1 ]
Vazquez-Gomez, Marta [1 ]
Id-Lahoucine, Samir [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Ciencia Anim & Aliments, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[2] Scotlands Rural Coll, Anim & Vet Sci Grp, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Evidential statistics; Paternity; Sequencing; Simulation; Traceability; GENETIC TRACEABILITY; MARKERS; SELECTION; IDENTIFICATION; POLYMORPHISM; ASSOCIATION; ASSIGNMENT; IMPUTATION; GENOTYPE; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104629
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Procedures for genetic traceability of animal products and parentage testing mainly focus on microsatellites or SNPs panels. Nevertheless, current availability of high-throughput sequencing technologies must be considered as an appealing alternative. This research focused on the evaluation of low-coverage whole-genome sequencing for traceability and paternity testing purposes, within a context of evidential statistics. Analyses were performed on a simulation basis and assumed individuals with 30 100-Mb/100-cM chromosome pairs and similar to 1,000,000 polymorphic SNPs per chromosome. Ten independent populations were simulated under recombination and mutation with effective populations size 100 (generations 1-1000), 10,000 (generation 1001) and 25,000 (generation 1002), and this last generation was retained for analytical purposes. Appropriate both traceability and paternity tests were developed and evaluated on different high-throughput sequencing scenarios accounting for genome coverage depth (0.01x, 0.05x, 0.1x and 0.5x), length of base-pair reads (100, 1000 and 10,000 bp), and sequencing error rate (0%, 1% and 10%). Assuming true sequencing error rates and genotypic frequencies, 0.05x genome coverage depth guaranteed 100% sensitivity and specificity for traceability and paternity tests (n = 1000). Same results were obtained when sequencing error rate was arbitrarily set to 0, or the maximum value assumed during simulation (i.e., 1%). In a similar way, uncertainly about genotypic frecuencies did not impair sensitivity under 0.05x genome coverage, although it reduced specificity for paternity tests up to 85.2%. These results highlighted low-coverage whole-genome sequencing as a promising tool for the livestock and food industry with both technological and (maybe) economic advantages.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Low coverage whole genome sequencing enables accurate assessment of common variants and calculation of genome-wide polygenic scores
    Homburger, Julian R.
    Neben, Cynthia L.
    Mishne, Gilad
    Zhou, Alicia Y.
    Kathiresan, Sekar
    Khera, Amit V.
    GENOME MEDICINE, 2019, 11 (01)
  • [42] Enrichment of low-frequency functional variants revealed by whole-genome sequencing of multiple isolated European populations
    Xue, Yali
    Mezzavilla, Massimo
    Haber, Marc
    McCarthy, Shane
    Chen, Yuan
    Narasimhan, Vagheesh
    Gilly, Arthur
    Ayub, Qasim
    Colonna, Vincenza
    Southam, Lorraine
    Finan, Christopher
    Massaia, Andrea
    Chheda, Himanshu
    Palta, Priit
    Ritchie, Graham
    Asimit, Jennifer
    Dedoussis, George
    Gasparini, Paolo
    Palotie, Aarno
    Ripatti, Samuli
    Soranzo, Nicole
    Toniolo, Daniela
    Wilson, James F.
    Durbin, Richard
    Tyler-Smith, Chris
    Zeggini, Eleftheria
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 8
  • [43] Practical low-coverage genomewide sequencing of hundreds of individually barcoded samples for population and evolutionary genomics in nonmodel species
    Therkildsen, Nina Overgaard
    Palumbi, Stephen R.
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2017, 17 (02) : 194 - 208
  • [44] High-coverage whole-genome sequencing of the expanded 1000 Genomes Project cohort including 602 trios
    Byrska-Bishop, Marta
    Evani, Uday S.
    Zhao, Xuefang
    Basile, Anna O.
    Abel, Haley J.
    Regier, Allison A.
    Corvelo, Andre
    Clarke, Wayne E.
    Musunuri, Rajeeva
    Nagulapalli, Kshithija
    Fairley, Susan
    Runnels, Alexi
    Winterkorn, Lara
    Lowy, Ernesto
    Flicek, Paul
    Germer, Soren
    Brand, Harrison
    Hall, Ira M.
    Talkowski, Michael E.
    Narzisi, Giuseppe
    Zody, Michael C.
    CELL, 2022, 185 (18) : 3426 - +
  • [45] Mapping and selection of downy mildew resistance in spinach cv. whale by low coverage whole genome sequencing
    Bhattarai, Gehendra
    Olaoye, Dotun
    Mou, Beiquan
    Correll, James C.
    Shi, Ainong
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [46] Experimental Evolution of Enhanced Growth by Bacillus subtilis at Low Atmospheric Pressure: Genomic Changes Revealed by Whole-Genome Sequencing
    Waters, Samantha M.
    Zeigler, Daniel R.
    Nicholson, Wayne L.
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 81 (21) : 7525 - 7532
  • [47] Non-invasive detection of biliary tract cancer by low-coverage whole genome sequencing from plasma cell-free DNA: A prospective cohort study
    Wang, Xiang
    Fu, Xiao-Hui
    Qian, Zi-Liang
    Zhao, Teng
    Duan, An-Qi
    Ruan, Xiang
    Zhu, Bin
    Yin, Lei
    Zhang, Yong-Jie
    Yu, Wen-Long
    TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 14 (01):
  • [48] Towards a Cost-Effective Implementation of Genomic Prediction Based on Low Coverage Whole Genome Sequencing in Dezhou Donkey
    Zhao, Changheng
    Teng, Jun
    Zhang, Xinhao
    Wang, Dan
    Zhang, Xinyi
    Li, Shiyin
    Jiang, Xin
    Li, Haijing
    Ning, Chao
    Zhang, Qin
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2021, 12
  • [49] Combined ultra-low input mRNA and whole-genome sequencing of human embryonic stem cells
    Mertes, Florian
    Lichtner, Bjoern
    Kuhl, Heiner
    Blattner, Mirjam
    Otte, Joerg
    Wruck, Wasco
    Timmermann, Bernd
    Lehrach, Hans
    Adjaye, James
    BMC GENOMICS, 2015, 16
  • [50] A multilocus approach for accurate variant calling in low-copy repeats using whole-genome sequencing
    Prodanov, Timofey
    Bansal, Vikas
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 39 : i279 - i287