Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing in livestock species for individual traceability and parentage testing

被引:1
|
作者
Casellas, Joaquim [1 ]
de Hijas-Villalba, Melani Martin [1 ]
Vazquez-Gomez, Marta [1 ]
Id-Lahoucine, Samir [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Ciencia Anim & Aliments, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[2] Scotlands Rural Coll, Anim & Vet Sci Grp, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Evidential statistics; Paternity; Sequencing; Simulation; Traceability; GENETIC TRACEABILITY; MARKERS; SELECTION; IDENTIFICATION; POLYMORPHISM; ASSOCIATION; ASSIGNMENT; IMPUTATION; GENOTYPE; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104629
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Procedures for genetic traceability of animal products and parentage testing mainly focus on microsatellites or SNPs panels. Nevertheless, current availability of high-throughput sequencing technologies must be considered as an appealing alternative. This research focused on the evaluation of low-coverage whole-genome sequencing for traceability and paternity testing purposes, within a context of evidential statistics. Analyses were performed on a simulation basis and assumed individuals with 30 100-Mb/100-cM chromosome pairs and similar to 1,000,000 polymorphic SNPs per chromosome. Ten independent populations were simulated under recombination and mutation with effective populations size 100 (generations 1-1000), 10,000 (generation 1001) and 25,000 (generation 1002), and this last generation was retained for analytical purposes. Appropriate both traceability and paternity tests were developed and evaluated on different high-throughput sequencing scenarios accounting for genome coverage depth (0.01x, 0.05x, 0.1x and 0.5x), length of base-pair reads (100, 1000 and 10,000 bp), and sequencing error rate (0%, 1% and 10%). Assuming true sequencing error rates and genotypic frequencies, 0.05x genome coverage depth guaranteed 100% sensitivity and specificity for traceability and paternity tests (n = 1000). Same results were obtained when sequencing error rate was arbitrarily set to 0, or the maximum value assumed during simulation (i.e., 1%). In a similar way, uncertainly about genotypic frecuencies did not impair sensitivity under 0.05x genome coverage, although it reduced specificity for paternity tests up to 85.2%. These results highlighted low-coverage whole-genome sequencing as a promising tool for the livestock and food industry with both technological and (maybe) economic advantages.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Genotype Imputation for SNP Array and Low-Coverage Whole-Genome Sequencing Data
    Deng, Tianyu
    Zhang, Pengfei
    Garrick, Dorian
    Gao, Huijiang
    Wang, Lixian
    Zhao, Fuping
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 12
  • [2] Efficient Mapping and Cloning of Mutations in Zebrafish by Low-Coverage Whole-Genome Sequencing
    Bowen, Margot E.
    Henke, Katrin
    Siegfried, Kellee R.
    Warman, Matthew L.
    Harris, Matthew P.
    GENETICS, 2012, 190 (03) : 1017 - U229
  • [3] Genotyping by low-coverage whole-genome sequencing in intercross pedigrees from outbred founders: a cost-efficient approach
    Zan, Yanjun
    Payen, Thibaut
    Lillie, Mette
    Honaker, Christa F.
    Siegel, Paul B.
    Carlborg, Orjan
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2019, 51 (01)
  • [4] Museomics and phylogenomics of lovebirds (Psittaciformes, Psittaculidae, Agapornis) using low-coverage whole-genome sequencing
    Huynh, Stella
    Cloutier, Alison
    Sin, Simon Yung Wa
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 185
  • [5] Ultra Low-Coverage Whole-Genome Sequencing as an Alternative to Genotyping Arrays in Genome-Wide Association Studies
    Chat, Vylyny
    Ferguson, Robert
    Morales, Leah
    Kirchhoff, Tomas
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 12
  • [6] Information recovery from low coverage whole-genome bisulfite sequencing
    Libertini, Emanuele
    Heath, Simon C.
    Hamoudi, Rifat A.
    Gut, Marta
    Ziller, Michael J.
    Czyz, Agata
    Ruotti, Victor
    Stunnenberg, Hendrik G.
    Frontini, Mattia
    Ouwehand, Willem H.
    Meissner, Alexander
    Gut, Ivo G.
    Beck, Stephan
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 7
  • [7] Using low-coverage whole genome sequencing (genome skimming) to delineate three introgressed species of buffalofish (Ictiobus)
    Literman, Robert
    Windsor, Amanda M.
    Bart Jr, Henry L.
    Hunter, Elizabeth Sage
    Deeds, Jonathan R.
    Handy, Sara M.
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 182
  • [8] Powerful Inference with the D-Statistic on Low-Coverage Whole-Genome Data
    Soraggi, Samuele
    Wiuf, Carsten
    Albrechtsen, Anders
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2018, 8 (02): : 551 - 566
  • [9] An accurate assignment test for extremely low-coverage whole-genome sequence data
    Ferrari, Giada
    Atmore, Lane M.
    Jentoft, Sissel
    Jakobsen, Kjetill S.
    Makowiecki, Daniel
    Barrett, James H.
    Star, Bastiaan
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2022, 22 (04) : 1330 - 1344
  • [10] A beginner's guide to low-coverage whole genome sequencing for population genomics
    Lou, Runyang Nicolas
    Jacobs, Arne
    Wilder, Aryn P.
    Therkildsen, Nina Overgaard
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2021, 30 (23) : 5966 - 5993