Off-Pump Surgery Is Not a Contraindication for Patients with a Severely Decreased Ejection Fraction

被引:1
|
作者
Emmert, Maximilian Y. [1 ,2 ]
Salzberg, Sacha P. [1 ,2 ]
Seifert, Burkhardt [3 ]
Schurr, Ulrich P. [1 ]
Theusinger, Oliver M. [4 ]
Hoerstrup, Simon P. [2 ]
Reuthebuch, Oliver [1 ]
Genoni, Michele [1 ]
机构
[1] Stadtspital Triemli, Dept Cardiac Surg, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Cardiac & Vasc Surg, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Inst Social & Prevent Med, Biostat Unit, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Anaesthesiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
CORONARY-ARTERY-BYPASS; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; ON-PUMP; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; REVASCULARIZATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1532/HSF98.20111027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: A severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (30%) increases the risk of surgical myocardial revascularization. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery in patients with a severely decreased EF. Methods: We compared 79 patients with an EF = 30% (group A) with 863 patients with an EF > 30% (group B) who underwent myocardial revascularization between 2003 and 2008. The relationship between EF and outcome after OPCAB was assessed by univariate and logistic regression analyses. A composite end point was constructed from 30-day mortality, renal failure, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) > 2 days, neurologic complications, and use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Additionally, the completeness of revascularization was assessed. Results: The mortality rates for groups A and B were comparable (1.3% and 2.0%, respectively; P = .55), and the 2 groups did not differ with regard to serious postoperative complications, such as stroke (2.5% versus 1.4% for groups A and B, respectively; P = .42), peripheral neurologic complications (2.5% versus 0.7%, P = .14), renal failure (0% versus 1.1%, P = 1.00), use of an IABP (1.3% versus 0.8%, P = .50), ICU length of stay > 2 days (17.7% versus 19.6%, P = .77). Similarly, groups A and B did not differ with regard to ventilation time (11.2 +/- 12.7 hours versus 12.4 +/- 15.5 hours, P = .82), indicating similar postoperative courses for the 2 groups of patients. In contrast, the composite end point occurred significantly more frequently in group A (43.0% versus 29.7%, P = .02), a result driven by the increased rate of rethoracotomy for bleeding in that group (11.4% versus 2.9%, P = .001). The 2 groups were similar with respect to the total number of grafts used per patient (3.82 +/- 0.89 versus 3.63 +/- 1.01, P = .10) and the completeness of revascularization (94% versus 93%, P = .49). Conclusion: A standardized OPCAB approach is safe for patients with a severely decreased EF, and its use does not come at the cost of less complete revascularization.
引用
收藏
页码:E302 / E306
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety of off-pump coronary artery surgery: no more skepticism please!
    Raja, SG
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 26 (06) : 1229 - 1229
  • [32] The feasibility and safety of off-pump coronary bypass surgery in emergency revascularization
    Joo, Hyun-Chel
    Youn, Young-Nam
    Chang, Byung-Chul
    Yoo, Kyung-Jong
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 (04) : 2268 - 2278
  • [33] Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: The long and winding road
    Farina, Piero
    Gaudino, Mario
    Angelini, Gianni D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 279 : 51 - 55
  • [34] Off-pump vs. on-pump bypass surgery grafting in diabetic patients with three-vessel disease: a propensity score matching study
    Song, Yu
    Wang, Chen
    Tang, Chuanbin
    Huang, Xiaofan
    Wang, Dashuai
    Li, Rui
    Luo, Jingjing
    Tuerxun, Yisilamujiang
    Li, Yuanming
    Liu, Baoqing
    Wu, Long
    Du, Xinling
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [35] Effectivity of dexamethasone in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
    Hanafy, Dudy Arman
    Harta, I. Komang Adhi Parama
    Prasetya, I. Made Indra
    Busroh, Pribadi Wiranda
    Soetisna, Tri Wisesa
    Sugisman
    Wartono, Dicky Aligheri
    Tjubandi, Amin
    Herlambang, Bagus
    ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS, 2021, 29 (05) : 388 - 393
  • [36] Advantages of off-pump coronary bypass surgery in high-risk patients
    Fuster, RG
    Montero, JA
    Gil, O
    Hornero, F
    Cánovas, SJ
    Daimau, MJ
    Bueno, M
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2002, 55 (04): : 383 - 390
  • [37] External Reshaping of the Left Ventricle in Off-Pump Surgery
    Prapas, Sotirios N.
    Protogeros, Demetrios A.
    Kotsis, Vassilios N.
    Panagiotopoulos, Ioannis A.
    Raptis, Ioannis P.
    Danou, Fotini N.
    Linardakis, Ioannis N.
    Karatza, Dimitra C.
    Anagnostopoulos, Constantinos E.
    INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 1 (04) : 155 - 159
  • [38] Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery surgery in octogenarians (from the KROK Registry)
    Knapik, Piotr
    Hirnle, Grzegorz
    Kowalczuk-Wieteska, Anetta
    Zembala, Michal O.
    Pawlak, Szymon
    Hrapkowicz, Tomasz
    Przybylowski, Piotr
    Nadziakiewicz, Pawel
    Ciesla, Daniel
    Perek, Bartlomiej
    Kapelak, Boguslaw
    Cisowski, Marek
    Rogowski, Jan
    Pietrzyk, Edward
    Tobota, Zdzislaw
    Zembala, Marian
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (09):
  • [39] Long-term results after systematic off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery in 1000 consecutive patients
    El-Hamamsy, Ismail
    Cartier, Raymond
    Demers, Philippe
    Bouchard, Denis
    Pellerin, Michel
    CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 : I486 - I491
  • [40] Comparison of inflammatory response during on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
    Rimmele, Thomas
    Venkataraman, Ramesh
    Madden, Nicholas J.
    Elder, Michele M.
    Wei, Lawrence M.
    Pellegrini, Ronald V.
    Kellum, John A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2010, 33 (03) : 131 - 138