Off-Pump Surgery Is Not a Contraindication for Patients with a Severely Decreased Ejection Fraction

被引:1
|
作者
Emmert, Maximilian Y. [1 ,2 ]
Salzberg, Sacha P. [1 ,2 ]
Seifert, Burkhardt [3 ]
Schurr, Ulrich P. [1 ]
Theusinger, Oliver M. [4 ]
Hoerstrup, Simon P. [2 ]
Reuthebuch, Oliver [1 ]
Genoni, Michele [1 ]
机构
[1] Stadtspital Triemli, Dept Cardiac Surg, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Cardiac & Vasc Surg, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Inst Social & Prevent Med, Biostat Unit, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Anaesthesiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
CORONARY-ARTERY-BYPASS; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; ON-PUMP; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; REVASCULARIZATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1532/HSF98.20111027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: A severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (30%) increases the risk of surgical myocardial revascularization. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery in patients with a severely decreased EF. Methods: We compared 79 patients with an EF = 30% (group A) with 863 patients with an EF > 30% (group B) who underwent myocardial revascularization between 2003 and 2008. The relationship between EF and outcome after OPCAB was assessed by univariate and logistic regression analyses. A composite end point was constructed from 30-day mortality, renal failure, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) > 2 days, neurologic complications, and use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Additionally, the completeness of revascularization was assessed. Results: The mortality rates for groups A and B were comparable (1.3% and 2.0%, respectively; P = .55), and the 2 groups did not differ with regard to serious postoperative complications, such as stroke (2.5% versus 1.4% for groups A and B, respectively; P = .42), peripheral neurologic complications (2.5% versus 0.7%, P = .14), renal failure (0% versus 1.1%, P = 1.00), use of an IABP (1.3% versus 0.8%, P = .50), ICU length of stay > 2 days (17.7% versus 19.6%, P = .77). Similarly, groups A and B did not differ with regard to ventilation time (11.2 +/- 12.7 hours versus 12.4 +/- 15.5 hours, P = .82), indicating similar postoperative courses for the 2 groups of patients. In contrast, the composite end point occurred significantly more frequently in group A (43.0% versus 29.7%, P = .02), a result driven by the increased rate of rethoracotomy for bleeding in that group (11.4% versus 2.9%, P = .001). The 2 groups were similar with respect to the total number of grafts used per patient (3.82 +/- 0.89 versus 3.63 +/- 1.01, P = .10) and the completeness of revascularization (94% versus 93%, P = .49). Conclusion: A standardized OPCAB approach is safe for patients with a severely decreased EF, and its use does not come at the cost of less complete revascularization.
引用
收藏
页码:E302 / E306
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Controversies in Off-pump Coronary Artery Surgery
    Pepper, John
    CLINICAL MEDICINE & RESEARCH, 2005, 3 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [22] On-pump and off-pump bypass surgery - Tools for Revascularization
    Lytle, BW
    Sabik, JF
    CIRCULATION, 2004, 109 (07) : 810 - 812
  • [23] Outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with severely dilated left ventricle
    Li, Sen
    Gong, Wenhui
    Qi, Quan
    Yuan, Zezhe
    Chen, Anqing
    Liu, Jun
    Cai, Junfeng
    Zhou, Mi
    Wang, Zhe
    Ye, Xiaofeng
    Zhao, Qiang
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (18)
  • [24] Off-pump compared to minimal extracorporeal circulation surgery in coronary artery bypass grafting
    Reuthebuch, Oliver
    Koechlin, Luca
    Gahl, Brigitta
    Matt, Peter
    Schurr, Ulrich
    Grapow, Martin
    Eckstein, Friedrich
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2014, 144
  • [25] On-pump or off-pump? Impact of risk scores in coronary artery bypass surgery
    Vilca Mejia, Omar Asdrubal
    Ferreira Lisboa, Luiz Augusto
    Puig, Luiz Boro
    Pinho Moreira, Luiz Felipe
    Oliveira Dallan, Luis Alberto
    Jatene, Fabio Biscegli
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIRURGIA CARDIOVASCULAR, 2012, 27 (04): : 503 - 511
  • [26] Off-pump coronary artery surgery with the Coroneo Cor-Vasc stabilizing device: clinical experience of 141 patients
    Spina, Amedeo
    Benussi, Bernardo
    Pappalardo, Aniello
    Forti, Gabriella
    Tognolli, Umberto
    Gabrielli, Marco
    Gatti, Giuseppe
    Zingone, Bartolo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2010, 11 (05) : 381 - 385
  • [27] On-Pump versus Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery.
    Shroyer, A. Laurie
    Grover, Frederick L.
    Hattler, Brack
    Collins, Joseph F.
    McDonald, Gerald O.
    Kozora, Elizabeth
    Lucke, John C.
    Baltz, Janet H.
    Novitzky, Dimitri
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (19) : 1827 - 1837
  • [28] Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery can be completed safely in high risk patients
    Tekumit, Hayrettin
    Cenal, Ali Riza
    Tataroglu, Cenk
    Polat, Adil
    Uzun, Kemal
    Akinci, Esat
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2010, 68 (02) : 166 - 172
  • [29] Graft Patency After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
    Thourani, Vinod H.
    Guyton, Robert A.
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 125 (23) : 2806 - 2808
  • [30] Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass is a Sate Option in Patients Presenting as Emergency
    Martinez, Eliana C.
    Emmert, Maximilian Y.
    Thomas, George N.
    Emmert, Lorenz S.
    Lee, Chuen Neng
    Kofidis, Theo
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2010, 39 (08) : 607 - 612