Off-Pump Surgery Is Not a Contraindication for Patients with a Severely Decreased Ejection Fraction

被引:1
作者
Emmert, Maximilian Y. [1 ,2 ]
Salzberg, Sacha P. [1 ,2 ]
Seifert, Burkhardt [3 ]
Schurr, Ulrich P. [1 ]
Theusinger, Oliver M. [4 ]
Hoerstrup, Simon P. [2 ]
Reuthebuch, Oliver [1 ]
Genoni, Michele [1 ]
机构
[1] Stadtspital Triemli, Dept Cardiac Surg, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Cardiac & Vasc Surg, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Inst Social & Prevent Med, Biostat Unit, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Anaesthesiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
CORONARY-ARTERY-BYPASS; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; ON-PUMP; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; REVASCULARIZATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1532/HSF98.20111027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: A severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (30%) increases the risk of surgical myocardial revascularization. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery in patients with a severely decreased EF. Methods: We compared 79 patients with an EF = 30% (group A) with 863 patients with an EF > 30% (group B) who underwent myocardial revascularization between 2003 and 2008. The relationship between EF and outcome after OPCAB was assessed by univariate and logistic regression analyses. A composite end point was constructed from 30-day mortality, renal failure, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) > 2 days, neurologic complications, and use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Additionally, the completeness of revascularization was assessed. Results: The mortality rates for groups A and B were comparable (1.3% and 2.0%, respectively; P = .55), and the 2 groups did not differ with regard to serious postoperative complications, such as stroke (2.5% versus 1.4% for groups A and B, respectively; P = .42), peripheral neurologic complications (2.5% versus 0.7%, P = .14), renal failure (0% versus 1.1%, P = 1.00), use of an IABP (1.3% versus 0.8%, P = .50), ICU length of stay > 2 days (17.7% versus 19.6%, P = .77). Similarly, groups A and B did not differ with regard to ventilation time (11.2 +/- 12.7 hours versus 12.4 +/- 15.5 hours, P = .82), indicating similar postoperative courses for the 2 groups of patients. In contrast, the composite end point occurred significantly more frequently in group A (43.0% versus 29.7%, P = .02), a result driven by the increased rate of rethoracotomy for bleeding in that group (11.4% versus 2.9%, P = .001). The 2 groups were similar with respect to the total number of grafts used per patient (3.82 +/- 0.89 versus 3.63 +/- 1.01, P = .10) and the completeness of revascularization (94% versus 93%, P = .49). Conclusion: A standardized OPCAB approach is safe for patients with a severely decreased EF, and its use does not come at the cost of less complete revascularization.
引用
收藏
页码:E302 / E306
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery improve the outcome in high-risk patients?: a comparative study of 1398 high-risk patients [J].
Al-Ruzzeh, S ;
Nakamura, K ;
Athanasiou, T ;
Modine, T ;
George, S ;
Yacoub, M ;
Ilsley, C ;
Amrani, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 23 (01) :50-55
[2]  
Arom I, 2001, ANN THORAC SURG, V72, P1288
[3]   Is low ejection fraction safe for off-pump coronary bypass operation? [J].
Arom, KV ;
Flavin, TF ;
Emery, RW ;
Kshettry, VR ;
Petersen, RJ ;
Janey, PA .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 70 (03) :1021-1025
[4]   Evaluation of the effectiveness of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients: An observational study [J].
Chamberlain, MH ;
Ascione, R ;
Reeves, BC ;
Angelini, GD .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 73 (06) :1866-1873
[5]   Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity [J].
Cleveland, JC ;
Shroyer, ALW ;
Chen, AY ;
Peterson, E ;
Grover, FL .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (04) :1282-1288
[6]  
Eagle Kim A, 2004, Circulation, V110, pe340
[7]   Despite modern off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting women fare worse than men [J].
Emmert, Maximilian Y. ;
Salzberg, Sacha P. ;
Seifert, Burkhardt ;
Schurr, Ulrich P. ;
Odavic, Dragan ;
Reuthebuch, Oliver ;
Genoni, Michele .
INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 10 (05) :737-741
[8]   Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery - Differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revascularization [J].
Hannan, Edward L. ;
Wu, Chuntao ;
Smith, Craig R. ;
Higgins, Robert S. D. ;
Carlson, Russell E. ;
Culliford, Alfred T. ;
Gold, Jeffrey P. ;
Jones, Robert H. .
CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (10) :1145-1152
[9]   Influence of on-pump versus off-pump techniques and completeness of revascularization on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass [J].
Lattouf, Omar M. ;
Thourani, Vinod H. ;
Kilgo, Patrick D. ;
Halkos, Michael E. ;
Baio, Kim T. ;
Myung, Richard ;
Cooper, William A. ;
Guyton, Robert A. ;
Puskas, John D. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 86 (03) :797-805
[10]   Patient selection and current practice strategy for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery [J].
Magee, MJ ;
Coombs, LP ;
Peterson, ED ;
Mack, MJ .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (10) :9-14