Off-Pump Surgery Is Not a Contraindication for Patients with a Severely Decreased Ejection Fraction

被引:1
|
作者
Emmert, Maximilian Y. [1 ,2 ]
Salzberg, Sacha P. [1 ,2 ]
Seifert, Burkhardt [3 ]
Schurr, Ulrich P. [1 ]
Theusinger, Oliver M. [4 ]
Hoerstrup, Simon P. [2 ]
Reuthebuch, Oliver [1 ]
Genoni, Michele [1 ]
机构
[1] Stadtspital Triemli, Dept Cardiac Surg, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Cardiac & Vasc Surg, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Inst Social & Prevent Med, Biostat Unit, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Anaesthesiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
CORONARY-ARTERY-BYPASS; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; ON-PUMP; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; REVASCULARIZATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1532/HSF98.20111027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: A severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (30%) increases the risk of surgical myocardial revascularization. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery in patients with a severely decreased EF. Methods: We compared 79 patients with an EF = 30% (group A) with 863 patients with an EF > 30% (group B) who underwent myocardial revascularization between 2003 and 2008. The relationship between EF and outcome after OPCAB was assessed by univariate and logistic regression analyses. A composite end point was constructed from 30-day mortality, renal failure, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) > 2 days, neurologic complications, and use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Additionally, the completeness of revascularization was assessed. Results: The mortality rates for groups A and B were comparable (1.3% and 2.0%, respectively; P = .55), and the 2 groups did not differ with regard to serious postoperative complications, such as stroke (2.5% versus 1.4% for groups A and B, respectively; P = .42), peripheral neurologic complications (2.5% versus 0.7%, P = .14), renal failure (0% versus 1.1%, P = 1.00), use of an IABP (1.3% versus 0.8%, P = .50), ICU length of stay > 2 days (17.7% versus 19.6%, P = .77). Similarly, groups A and B did not differ with regard to ventilation time (11.2 +/- 12.7 hours versus 12.4 +/- 15.5 hours, P = .82), indicating similar postoperative courses for the 2 groups of patients. In contrast, the composite end point occurred significantly more frequently in group A (43.0% versus 29.7%, P = .02), a result driven by the increased rate of rethoracotomy for bleeding in that group (11.4% versus 2.9%, P = .001). The 2 groups were similar with respect to the total number of grafts used per patient (3.82 +/- 0.89 versus 3.63 +/- 1.01, P = .10) and the completeness of revascularization (94% versus 93%, P = .49). Conclusion: A standardized OPCAB approach is safe for patients with a severely decreased EF, and its use does not come at the cost of less complete revascularization.
引用
收藏
页码:E302 / E306
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery Is Safe in Patients with a Low Ejection Fraction (≤25%)
    Emmert, Maximilian Y.
    Emmert, Lorenz S.
    Martinez, Eliana C.
    Lee, Chuen N.
    Kofidis, Theo
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2010, 13 (03) : E136 - E142
  • [2] Off-pump surgery for the poor ventricle?
    Emmert, Maximilian Y.
    Salzberg, Sacha P.
    Theusinger, Oliver M.
    Rodriguez, Hector
    Suendermann, Simon H.
    Plass, Andre
    Starck, Christoph T.
    Seifert, Burkhardt
    Baulig, Werner
    Hoerstrup, Simon P.
    Jacobs, Stephan
    Gruenenfelder, Juerg
    Falk, Volkmar
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2012, 27 (03) : 258 - 264
  • [3] The influence of a low ejection fraction on long-term survival in systematic off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
    Maltais, Simon
    Ladouceur, Martin
    Cartier, Raymond
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 39 (05) : E122 - E127
  • [4] Off-pump coronary surgery: where do we stand in 2010?
    Halkos, Michael E.
    Puskas, John D.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 25 (06) : 583 - 588
  • [5] Off-pump coronary surgery. Experience in 220 patients
    Seguel S, Enrique
    Gonzalez, Roberto
    Stockins, Aleck
    Alarcon C, Emilio
    Concha C, Ricardo
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2013, 141 (03) : 281 - 290
  • [6] The current status of off-pump coronary bypass surgery
    Huffmyer, Julie
    Raphael, Jacob
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 24 (01) : 64 - 69
  • [7] Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in selected patients is superior to the conventional approach for patients with severely depressed left ventricular function
    Caputti, Guido Marco
    Palma, Jose Honorio
    Gaia, Diego Felipe
    Buffolo, Enio
    CLINICS, 2011, 66 (12) : 2049 - 2053
  • [8] A comparison of off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery in patients with low EuroSCORE
    Ercan, Abdulkadir
    Karal, Ilker Hasan
    Gurbuz, Orcun
    Kumtepe, Gencehan
    Onder, Tolga
    Saba, Davit
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 9
  • [9] Off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Yushu
    Zhu, Sui
    Gao, Peijuan
    Zhou, Juteng
    Zhang, Qing
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 22 (01) : 99 - 109
  • [10] Morbidity But Not Mortality Is Decreased After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
    Brewer, Robert
    Theurer, Patricia F.
    Cogan, Chad M.
    Bell, Gail F.
    Prager, Richard L.
    Paone, Gaetano
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 97 (03) : 831 - 837