Sacroperineal Reconstruction With Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps After Resection of Locally Advanced Primary and Recurrent Anorectal Malignancy

被引:1
|
作者
Khalil, Haitham H. [1 ]
McArthur, David [2 ]
Youssif, Sherif [1 ,3 ]
Alsharkawy, Kareem [1 ,4 ]
Hendrickse, Charles [2 ]
Dilworth, Mark [2 ]
Karandikar, Sharad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Solihull Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Solihull Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Assiut Univ, Fac Med, Plast Surg Dept, Assiut, Egypt
[4] Tanta Univ, Plast & Rceonstruct Surg Dept, Fac Med, Tanta, Egypt
关键词
perineal reconstruction; inferior; gluteal; sacral; rectal cancer; advanced; VAGINAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION; ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; RECTAL-CANCER; PELVIC EXENTERATION; PERINEAL RECONSTRUCTION; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; EXCISION; CLOSURE; EXPERIENCE; SUPERIOR;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003258
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Modern interdisciplinary concepts with involvement of various surgical specialties can considerably reduce perioperative morbidity after sacroperineal resection of locally advanced primary or recurrent anorectal malignancies. Resultant defects can represent a major challenge for reconstruction particularly with chemoradiotherapy. The aim is to assess the long-term outcomes of sacroperineal reconstruction using inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps. We performed a retrospective data analysis on 31 patients who were treated with inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps (n = 61) over the period 2009-2021. The demographic data, comorbidities, operative details, and outcomes with special focus on wound infection and dehiscence were recorded. The median age was 42 year (range, 25-82 years) with preponderance of males (n = 21). The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 80 months. Early minor complications included superficial wound dehiscence (3), which was managed conservatively, whereas the major (2) included deep wound collection and infection (1), which required surgical drainage, and perineal hernia, which required repair. All flaps survived completely. Inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps are safe, robust, and reliable with less donor side morbidity and positive impact on quality of life. It should be considered as a valuable tool in the reconstructive armamentarium of sacroperineal defects within a multidisciplinary setting.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 311
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision using inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps
    Hainsworth, A.
    Al Akash, M.
    Roblin, P.
    Mohanna, P.
    Ross, D.
    George, M. L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (04) : 584 - 588
  • [2] Feasibility of Perineal Defect Reconstruction with Simplified Fasciocutaneous Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator (IGAP) Flaps after Tumor Resection of the Lower Rectum: Incidence and Outcome in an Interdisciplinary Approach
    Thiel, J. T.
    Welskopf, H. L.
    Yurttas, C.
    Farzaliyev, F.
    Daigeler, A.
    Bachmann, R.
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [3] Comparison of inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps versus vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps in the reconstruction of perineal wounds
    Benedict, Katherine C.
    Songcharoen, Somjade J.
    Stephens, Kristin L.
    Winter, Anna L.
    Edwards, Shelley R.
    Campbell, Christopher A.
    Arnold, Peter B.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2023, 84 : 514 - 520
  • [4] Outcomes of perineal reconstruction with inferior gluteal artery myocutaneous flaps and primary closure following abdominoperineal resection
    Gultekin, Sinem
    Gartrell, Richard
    Lu, Lucy
    Croxford, Matthew
    Faragher, Ian
    Chan, Steven T. F.
    Yeung, Justin M. C.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 92 (11) : 2968 - 2973
  • [5] SUPERIOR AND INFERIOR GLUTEAL ARTERY PERFORATOR FLAPS IN RECONSTRUCTION OF GLUTEAL AND PERIANAL/PERINEAL HIDRADENITIS SUPPURATIVA LESIONS
    Unal, Cigdem
    Yirmibesoglu, Oktay Ahmet
    Ozdemir, Jale
    Hasdemir, Mustafa
    MICROSURGERY, 2011, 31 (07) : 539 - 544
  • [6] Simultaneous Bilateral Breast Reconstruction With In-the-Crease Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps
    Levine, Joshua L.
    Miller, Quintessa
    Vasile, Julie
    Khoobehi, Kamran
    Craigie, James
    Wise, Matthew W.
    Allen, Robert J.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2009, 63 (03) : 249 - 254
  • [7] Reconstruction of a Sacral Pressure Ulcer With an Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap After Failed Reconstruction Using Bilateral V-Y Advancement Flaps
    Wang, Chi-Yu
    Wu, Chien-Ju
    Chu, Tzi-Shiang
    Chen, Chun-Yu
    Chou, Chang-Yi
    Chiao, Hao-Yu
    Chang, Chun-Kai
    Dai, Niann-Tzyy
    OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 64 (02) : 45 - 48
  • [8] Immediate vaginal and perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision using the Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap (V-IGAP)
    Johal, Kavan S.
    Mishra, Ankit
    Alkizwini, Eman
    Whitehouse, Harry
    Batten, Gemma
    Hachach-Haram, Nadine
    Lancaster, Katie
    Constantinides, Joannis
    Mohanna, Pari-Naz
    Roblin, Paul
    Ross, David A.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (01) : 137 - 144
  • [9] Perineal defect reconstruction after surgery for advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer involving organ resection: Multiple flaps combined with lining repair
    Gao, Zhaoya
    Wang, Yanzhao
    Zeng, Qingmin
    Rong, Wanshui
    Wang, Zilong
    Zhai, Zhichao
    Ding, Changmin
    An, Ke
    Gao, Qingkun
    Niu, Pengfei
    Hong, Yuming
    He, Xiaomang
    Huang, Wensheng
    Lei, Fuming
    Wen, Bing
    Wang, Xin
    Gu, Jin
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 25 (10) : 2087 - 2092
  • [10] Extended Abdominoperineal Resection Is Oncologically Advantageous and when Undertaken in the Prone Position Offers an Optimal Position for Bilateral Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator Reconstruction Reply
    Arnold, Peter B.
    Lahr, Christopher J.
    Mitchell, Marc E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 215 (03) : 442 - 442