Effectiveness of dorsal root ganglion stimulation and dorsal column spinal cord stimulation in a model of experimental painful diabetic polyneuropathy

被引:16
作者
Koetsier, Eva [1 ]
Franken, Glenn [2 ,3 ]
Debets, Jacques [4 ]
van Kuijk, Sander M. J. [5 ]
Perez, Roberto S. G. M. [6 ]
Linderoth, Bengt [7 ]
Joosten, Elbert A. J. [2 ,3 ]
Maino, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Reg Hosp Lugano, Neuroctr Southern Switzerland, Pain Management Ctr, Lugano, Switzerland
[2] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Maastricht, Sch Mental Hlth & Neurosci MHeNS, Dept Translat Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Sch Cardiovasc Dis CARIM, Muroidean Facil, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Med Technol Assessment, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
animal model; dorsal root ganglion stimulation; neuromodulation; painful diabetic polyneuropathy; spinal cord stimulation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY; RAT MODEL; RELIEF; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MULTICENTER; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1111/cns.13065
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Aims Conventional dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is known to achieve better pain-paresthesia overlap of difficult-to-reach areas like the feet compared to dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS). As in painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN) pain is mostly present in the feet, we hypothesized that DRGS is more effective in relieving pain in PDPN when compared to SCS. Methods Diabetes was induced in female Sprague-Dawley rats with an intraperitoneal injection of 65 mg/kg of streptozotocin (STZ; n = 48). Rats with a significant decrease in mechanical paw withdrawal response to von Frey filaments 4 weeks after injection were implanted with DRGS electrodes (n = 18). Rats were assigned to DRGS (n = 11) or sham-DRGS (n = 7). Mechanical paw withdrawal thresholds (WT, measured in grams) in response to DRGS (50 Hz, 0.18 +/- 0.05 mA) were assessed with von Frey testing. The results of the experiments on these animals were compared to the results of a previous study using exactly the same model on PDPN animals selected for SCS (n = 8) (40-50 Hz, 0.19 +/- 0.01 mA) and sham-SCS (n = 3). Results In the SCS group, the log(10) (10 000 x 50% WT) increased from 4910 to 5211 at t = 15 minutes (P < 0.05) and 5264 at t = 30 minutes (P = 0.11). In the DRGS group, the log(10) (10,000 x 50% WT) increased from 4376 to 4809 at t = 15 minutes (P < 0.01) and 5042 at t = 30 minutes (P < 0.01). Both DRGS and SCS induced a similar and complete reversal of mechanical hypersensitivity. After cessation of stimulation (t = 60), the return of the log(10) (10 000 x 50% WT) response was significantly faster with DRGS than that of SCS (P < 0.05). Conclusions We conclude that conventional DRGS is as effective as SCS in reduction of PDPN-associated mechanical hypersensitivity in STZ-induced diabetic rats. The wash-in effect of DRGS and SCS was similar, but DRGS showed a faster washout course. Long-term efficacy should be studied in future animal research.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 374
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Prevalence and Characteristics of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy in a Large Community-Based Diabetic Population in the UK [J].
Abbott, Caroline A. ;
Malik, Rayaz A. ;
van Ross, Ernest R. E. ;
Kulkarni, Jai ;
Boulton, Andrew J. M. .
DIABETES CARE, 2011, 34 (10) :2220-2224
[2]  
[Anonymous], BMJ BRIT MED J, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.G1799
[3]  
Calcutt NA, 2004, METH MOLEC MED, P55
[4]   QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF TACTILE ALLODYNIA IN THE RAT PAW [J].
CHAPLAN, SR ;
BACH, FW ;
POGREL, JW ;
CHUNG, JM ;
YAKSH, TL .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 1994, 53 (01) :55-63
[5]   Alternate Intraspinal Targets for Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review [J].
Chien, George C. Chang ;
Mekhail, Nagy .
NEUROMODULATION, 2017, 20 (07) :629-+
[6]   Electrical spinal cord stimulation in the long-term treatment of chronic painful diabetic neuropathy [J].
Daousi, C ;
Benbow, SJ ;
MacFarlane, IA .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2005, 22 (04) :393-398
[7]   Spinal cord stimulation in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy: A multicentre randomized clinical trial [J].
de Vos, Cecile C. ;
Meier, Kaare ;
Zaalberg, Paul Brocades ;
Nijhuis, Harold J. A. ;
Duyvendak, Wim ;
Vesper, Jan ;
Enggaard, Thomas P. ;
Lenders, Mathieu W. P. M. .
PAIN, 2014, 155 (11) :2426-2431
[8]   Effect and safety of spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain caused by diabetic neuropathy [J].
de Vos, Cecile C. ;
Rajan, Vinayakrishnan ;
Steenbergen, Wiendelt ;
van der Aa, Hans E. ;
Buschman, Hendrik P. J. .
JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS, 2009, 23 (01) :40-45
[9]   A Prospective Study of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for the Relief of Chronic Pain [J].
Deer, Timothy R. ;
Grigsby, Eric ;
Weiner, Richard L. ;
Wilcosky, Bernard ;
Kramer, Jeffery M. .
NEUROMODULATION, 2013, 16 (01) :67-72
[10]   Neuropathic pain: what do we do with all these theories? [J].
Devor, M .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 45 (09) :1121-1127