A Structural Equation Model of Conceptual Change in Physics

被引:40
作者
Taasoobshirazi, Gita [1 ]
Sinatra, Gale M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kennesaw State Univ, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
conceptual change; science education; misconceptions; SELF-EFFICACY; FIT INDEXES; ACHIEVEMENT; MOTIVATION; SCIENCE; PERFORMANCE; GOALS; NEED; ENGAGEMENT; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1002/tea.20434
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A model of conceptual change in physics was tested on introductory-level, college physics students. Structural equation modeling was used to test hypothesized relationships among variables linked to conceptual change in physics including an approach goal orientation, need for cognition, motivation, and course grade. Conceptual change in physics was determined using gains from pre- to post-administration of the Force Concept Inventory (FCI). Results indicated that need for cognition and approach goals had a significant influence on motivation. Motivation influenced change scores on the FCI both directly, and indirectly, through course grade. Finally, course grade directly influenced conceptual change. The implications of these findings for future research and developing students' conceptual change in physics are discussed. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 48: 901-918, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 918
页数:18
相关论文
共 84 条
[31]   Comment on "How do we know if we are doing a good job in physics teaching?," by Robert Ehrlich [Am. J. Phys. 70 (1), 24-29 (2002)] [J].
Hake, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2002, 70 (10) :1058-1059
[32]   Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses [J].
Hake, RR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1998, 66 (01) :64-74
[33]   Effects of instructional support within constructivist learning environments for elementary school students' understanding of "floating and sinking" [J].
Hardy, Ilonca ;
Jonen, Angela ;
Moeller, Komelia ;
Stern, Elsbeth .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 98 (02) :307-326
[34]  
Hestenes D, 1992, The Physics Teacher, V30, P141, DOI [DOI 10.1119/1.2343497, 10.1119/1.2343497]
[35]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55
[36]   Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification [J].
Hu, LT ;
Bentler, PM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1998, 3 (04) :424-453
[37]  
Hynd C., 2000, Reading Writing Quarterly, V16, P23, DOI [DOI 10.1080/105735600278051, 10.1080/105735600278051]
[38]  
Jorkeskog K. G., 2007, LISREL 8 80
[39]  
Jorkeskog K. G., 2006, PRELIS2 USERS REFERE
[40]  
Keith T.Z., 1993, Analytic methods for educational productivity, P21