Shrinkage evaluation of heavyweight and lightweight polypropylene meshes in inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial

被引:27
作者
Silvestre, A. C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Mathia, G. B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fagundes, D. J. [4 ]
Medeiros, L. R. [5 ]
Rosa, M. I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Extremo Sul Catarinense, Lab Epidemiol, BR-88811550 Criciuma, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Extremo Sul Catarinense, Natl Inst Translat Med, BR-88811550 Criciuma, SC, Brazil
[3] Univ Extremo Sul Catarinense, Postgrad Program Hlth Sci, Hlth Sci Unit, BR-88811550 Criciuma, SC, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Surg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Postgrad Program Med Med Sci, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
Inguinal hernia; Randomized controlled trial; Mesh; RECURRENCE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; SURGERY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-011-0853-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
One of the current complications in inguinal repair is shrinkage following the use of mesh. The selected mesh material, heavyweight (HWM) mesh or lightweight (LWM) mesh, is associated with the frequency of shrinkage. The aim of this study was to investigate shrinkage of these two types of mesh in a controlled trial of male inguinal hernia repair. Thirty-two healthy men with primary unilateral inguinal hernias (Nyhus classification), who presented at So Jos, Hospital of CriciA(0)ma, Brazil, underwent the Lichtenstein procedure. In total, 16 polypropylene HWM (105 g/m(2)) and 16 partially absorbable LWM (28 g/m(2)) were implanted into randomly selected patients. On post-operative days 1, 30, 60 and 90, the area of the mesh was evaluated by digital radiography. The study randomized 32 patients and analyzed 30 patients-15 for each type of mesh. At baseline, there were no differences between groups. There were significant differences between the two meshes when comparing the total area initially and on postoperative day 90 (P = 0.001). The HWM had significantly less area initial area, as compared with 90 days postoperatively (P = 0.04). Shrinkage was significantly higher for HWM, although the difference was not large.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 634
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein repair vs the Valenti technique for inguinal hernia
    Mitura, K.
    Garnysz, K.
    Michalek, I.
    HERNIA, 2019, 23 (03) : 547 - 554
  • [42] Robotic Inguinal vs Transabdominal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: The RIVAL Randomized Clinical Trial
    Prabhu, Ajita S.
    Carbonell, Alfredo
    Hope, William
    Warren, Jeremy
    Higgins, Rana
    Jacob, Brian
    Blatnik, Jeffrey
    Haskins, Ivy
    Alkhatib, Hemasat
    Tastaldi, Luciano
    Fafaj, Aldo
    Tu, Chao
    Rosen, Michael J.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (05) : 380 - 387
  • [43] The DySLOH Study: Comparative Evaluation of the Results between the ProFlor and Lichtenstein Techniques for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair-A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Romano, Giorgio
    Di Buono, Giuseppe
    Rodolico, Vito
    Romano, Giorgio
    Barletta, Gabriele
    Zanghi, Guido
    Calo, Pietro Giorgio
    Buscemi, Salvatore
    Agrusa, Antonino
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (18)
  • [44] Lightweight mesh versus heavyweight mesh for laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    F. Wu
    X. Zhang
    Y. Liu
    D. Cao
    Y. Yu
    Y. Ma
    Hernia, 2020, 24 : 31 - 39
  • [45] Lightweight mesh versus heavyweight mesh for laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, F.
    Zhang, X.
    Liu, Y.
    Cao, D.
    Yu, Y.
    Ma, Y.
    HERNIA, 2020, 24 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [46] Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein repair vs the Valenti technique for inguinal hernia
    K. Mitura
    K. Garnysz
    I. Michałek
    Hernia, 2019, 23 : 547 - 554
  • [47] Shouldice versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Pompeu, Bernardo Fontel
    Pasqualotto, Eric
    Marcolin, Patricia
    Delgado, Lucas Monteiro
    Pigossi, Beatriz D'Andrea
    Leme, Luis Fernando Paes
    Melland-Smith, Megan
    de Figueiredo, Sergio Mazzola Poli
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 48 (11) : 2604 - 2614
  • [48] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair
    Sajid, M. S.
    Leaver, C.
    Baig, M. K.
    Sains, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (01) : 29 - 37
  • [49] Comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam as a sedation agent with local anesthesia in inguinal hernia repair: randomized controlled trial
    Mishina, T.
    Aiba, T.
    Hiramatsu, K.
    Shibata, Y.
    Yoshihara, M.
    Aoba, T.
    Yamaguchi, N.
    Kato, T.
    HERNIA, 2018, 22 (03) : 471 - 478
  • [50] Recurrent inguinal hernia: randomized multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair
    A. Eklund
    C. Rudberg
    C. -E. Leijonmarck
    I. Rasmussen
    L. Spangen
    G. Wickbom
    U. Wingren
    A. Montgomery
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2007, 21 : 634 - 640