The Surgical Care Improvement Project and Prevention of Post-Operative Infection, Including Surgical Site Infection

被引:191
|
作者
Rosenberger, Laura H. [1 ]
Politano, Amani D. [1 ]
Sawyer, Robert G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
INTENSIVE INSULIN THERAPY; WOUND-INFECTION; ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS; PERIOPERATIVE OXYGEN; PERFORMANCE-MEASURES; COLORECTAL SURGERY; GLUCOSE CONTROL; MAJOR SURGERY; ASSOCIATION; REDUCE;
D O I
10.1089/sur.2010.083
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: In response to inconsistent compliance with infection prevention measures, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services collaborated with the U. S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on the Surgical Infection Prevention (SIP) project, introduced in 2002. Methods: Quality improvement measures were developed to standardize processes to increase compliance. In 2006, the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) developed out of the SIP project and its process measures. These initiatives, published in the Specifications Manual for National Inpatient Quality Measures, outline process and outcome measures. This continually evolving manual is intended to provide standard quality measures to unify documentation and track standards of care. Results: Seven of the SCIP initiatives apply to the peri-operative period: Prophylactic antibiotics should be received within 1 h prior to surgical incision (1), be selected for activity against the most probable antimicrobial contaminants (2), and be discontinued within 24 h after the surgery end-time (3); (4) euglycemia should be maintained, with well-controlled morning blood glucose concentrations on the first two post-operative days, especially in cardiac surgery patients; (6) hair at the surgical site should be removed with clippers or by depilatory methods, not with a blade; (9) urinary catheters are to be removed within the first two post-operative days; and (10) normothermia should be maintained peri-operatively. Conclusions: There is strong evidence that implementation of protocols that standardize practices reduce the risk of surgical infection. The SCIP initiative targets complications that account for a significant portion of preventable morbidity as well as cost. One of the goals of the SCIP guidelines was a 25% reduction in the incidence of surgical site infections from implementation through 2010. Process measures are becoming routine, and as we practice more evidence-based medicine, it falls to us, the surgeons and scientists, to be active, not only in the implementation and execution of these measures, but in the investigation of clinical questions and the writing of protocols. We are responsible for ensuring that out-of-date practices are removed from use and that new practices are appropriate, achievable, and effective.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 168
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adherence to Surgical Care Improvement Project Measures and Post-Operative Surgical Site Infections
    Awad, Samir S.
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2012, 13 (04) : 234 - 237
  • [2] Care Bundles in Surgical Site Infection Prevention: A Narrative Review
    Ching, Patrick R.
    CURRENT INFECTIOUS DISEASE REPORTS, 2024, 26 (06) : 163 - 172
  • [3] Nonconcordance with Surgical Site Infection Prevention Guidelines and Rates of Surgical Site Infections for General Surgical, Neurological, and Orthopedic Procedures
    Young, Barnaby
    Ng, Tat Ming
    Teng, Christine
    Ang, Brenda
    Tai, Hwei Yee
    Lye, David C.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2011, 55 (10) : 4659 - 4663
  • [4] Surgical Site Infection Prevention A Review
    Seidelman, Jessica L.
    Mantyh, Christopher R.
    Anderson, Deverick J.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 329 (03): : 244 - 252
  • [5] DELAYED POST-OPERATIVE SURGICAL SITE INFECTION: SOURCE AND INVESTIGATION OF CAUSATIVE AGENT
    Sharma, D. C.
    Singh, S.
    Sharma, R.
    Sharma, C.
    Singh, R.
    Srivastava, P. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH, 2018, 9 (09): : 3976 - 3979
  • [6] Surgical Site Infection Prevention Time to Move Beyond the Surgical Care Improvement Program
    Hawn, Mary T.
    Vick, Catherine C.
    Richman, Joshua
    Holman, William
    Deierhoi, Rhiannon J.
    Graham, Laura A.
    Henderson, William G.
    Itani, Kamal M. F.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 254 (03) : 494 - 501
  • [7] Evidence-based Prevention of Surgical Site Infection
    Fuglestad, Matthew A.
    Tracey, Elisabeth L.
    Leinicke, Jennifer A.
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2021, 101 (06) : 951 - 966
  • [8] An Increase in Compliance With the Surgical Care Improvement Project Measures Does Not Prevent Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery
    Pastor, Carlos
    Artinyan, Avo
    Varma, Madhulika G.
    Kim, Edward
    Gibbs, Laurel
    Garcia-Aguilar, Julio
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [9] Surgical site infection prevention care bundles: evidence and guidelines
    Boermeester, Marja
    Bond-Smith, Giles
    Leaper, David
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2025, 34 (01) : 18 - 19
  • [10] Implementation of a Colorectal Surgical Site Infection Prevention Bundle and Checklist: A Quality Improvement Project
    White, Carrie
    Kurtz, Sarah
    Lusk, Leandra
    Wilson, Brigitte
    Britton, Vickie
    Hayden, Karen
    Hunt, Sarah
    Hyland, Jennifer
    Kittrell, William
    Maddox, Jason
    Tanner, Ashley
    Tucker, Valerie
    AORN JOURNAL, 2023, 118 (05) : 297 - 305