Sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in Europe: learning for the future

被引:23
作者
Thow, Anne Marie [1 ]
Rippin, Holly L. [2 ]
Mulcahy, Georgina [1 ]
Duffey, Keeva [2 ]
Wickramasinghe, Kremlin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Charles Perkins Ctr, Menzies Ctr Hlth Policy & Econ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] WHO Reg Off Europe, Div Country Hlth Programmes, WHO European Off Prevent & Control Noncommunicabl, Moscow, Russia
关键词
SOFT DRINKS; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; POLICY; ASSOCIATION; HEALTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1093/eurpub/ckab211
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes are recommended globally as part of measures to prevent diet-related NCDs. However, their uptake in the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region has been limited. The aim of this study was to inform strategic, cross-sectoral, public health policy engagement to support the uptake and effective implementation of SSB taxation. Methods We conducted a policy analysis of SSB taxes in the WHO European Region, drawing on theories of policy making and diffusion of innovation. Data were collected from policy documents and media, secondary contextual sources and qualitative interview data (n = 20) to analyze factors influencing the adoption of taxes in 10 countries. Results Belgium, Finland, France, Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, Monaco, Norway, Portugal and the UK had current SSB taxes, but Monaco was excluded from the findings due to its unique taxation context. All countries were characterized by policy priority for NCD prevention, and in many there was a fiscal imperative to raise revenue. The taxes took the form of excises or levies, and the tax base and rate varied between countries. SSB taxation was fostered by constructive engagement between health and fiscal policy makers, but also influenced by external industry and public health stakeholders. Policy learning from national and international experience was evident in all countries. Conclusions This study points to the value of ongoing policy learning for improving tax design, and the importance of constructive collaboration between finance and health policy makers. It also suggests regional bodies could play a greater role in supporting SSB taxation.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 280
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Barriers to, and facilitators of, the adoption of a sugar sweetened beverage tax to prevent non-communicable diseases in Uganda: a policy landscape analysis [J].
Ahaibwe, Gemma ;
Abdool Karim, Safura ;
Thow, Anne-Marie ;
Erzse, Agnes ;
Hofman, Karen .
GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2021, 14 (01)
[2]   Sugary drink excise tax policy process and implementation: Case study from Saudi Arabia [J].
Alsukait, Reem ;
Bleich, Sara ;
Wilde, Parke ;
Singh, Gitanjali ;
Folta, Sara .
FOOD POLICY, 2020, 90
[3]   The policy diffusion of environmental performance in the European countries [J].
Arbolino, Roberta ;
Carlucci, Fabio ;
De Simone, Luisa ;
Ioppolo, Giuseppe ;
Yigitcanlar, Tan .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 89 :130-138
[4]  
Beales PF, 2000, T ROY SOC TROP MED H, V94, pS1
[5]  
Black J., 2006, Regulatory innovation: A comparative analysis
[6]   The Economics of Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: A Review of the Effects on Prices, Sales, Cross-Border Shopping, and Consumption [J].
Cawley, John ;
Thow, Anne Marie ;
Wen, Katherine ;
Frisvold, David .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NUTRITION, VOL 39, 2019, 2019, 39 :317-338
[7]  
Coppedge M., 2020, V-Dem Dataset v10 (Varieties of Democracy [V-Dem]
[8]   Engagement of Sectors Other than Health in Integrated Health Governance, Policy, and Action [J].
de Leeuw, Evelyne .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 38, 2017, 38 :329-349
[9]   Trans fatty acid elimination policy in member states of the Eurasian Economic Union: Implementation challenges and capacity for enforcement [J].
Demin, Andrey ;
Loge, Bianca ;
Zhiteneva, Olga ;
Nishida, Chizuru ;
Whiting, Stephen ;
Rippin, Holly ;
Delles, Christian ;
Karymbaeva, Saliya ;
Wickramasinghe, Kremlin ;
Breda, Joao .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2020, 22 (08) :1328-1337
[10]  
Economist Intelligence Unit, 2020, The Economist