Assessments of carbon footprint and energy analysis of three wind farms

被引:32
作者
Xie, Jian-bo [1 ]
Fu, Jian-xun [1 ]
Liu, Si-yu [1 ]
Hwang, Weng-sing [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Tainan 701, Taiwan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Turbine; Electricity generation; Life cycle assessment; Wind power; Energy input; CO2; emission; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; INVENTORY ANALYSIS; POWER; PERFORMANCE; CHINA; TECHNOLOGIES; IMPACTS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120159
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Three kinds of turbines (Vestas V-47:660 kW, Enercon E-40:600 kW, Vestas V-66:1.75 MW) were installed on three selected sites (Mailiao, Jhongtun, Chunfong) as wind power plants for electricity generation on an island. However, such power plants including turbines in establishment and operation during entire life cycle are bound to consume energy and produce carbon emission, causing environmental problems. Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effects of three wind power plants on the environment during their entire life cycle. This paper made the calculations of carbon emissions of three wind power plants, and compared and discussed the occupied shares of each primary energy input in manufacture, construction, operation and disposal phases using the methods of mathematics and materials input-output life cycle assessment. The results show that the CO2 emission factor of three systems was on average 3.9 g/kWh for the whole life cycle. The average CO2 emission intensity of all raw materials was 1.35 kg/kg. The occupied share of CO2 emissions in manufacturing, construction, and decommissioning phases was 44%, 16%, and 40% respectively. The primary energy input intensity was on average 0.0625 MJ/kWh of three systems for whole life cycle. The average energy input intensity of three systems was 21.48 MJ/kg. The combined CO2 emission intensity of all steel materials was 1.98 kg/kg. The demands for materials and energy inputs, and carbon emissions are positively related to the rated power value of a wind turbine. Wind power has a priority to produce clean energy, and can significantly decrease CO2 emissions. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   A Comprehensive Energy Analysis and Related Carbon Footprint of Dairy Farms, Part 1: Direct Energy Requirements [J].
Todde, Giuseppe ;
Murgia, Lelia ;
Caria, Maria ;
Pazzona, Antonio .
ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (02)
[22]   Carbon footprint and economic performance of dairy farms: The case of protected designation of origin farms in France [J].
Lambotte, Mathieu ;
De Cara, Stephane ;
Brocas, Catherine ;
Bellassen, Valentin .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 186
[23]   CARBON FOOTPRINT ESTIMATION IN EGYPTIAN AQUACULTURE FARMS [J].
Fouda, Tarek ;
Elrayes, Abd-Elrahman ;
Elhanafy, Abd-Elhameed .
SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 22 (04) :225-238
[24]   Spatiotemporal carbon footprint and associated costs of wind power toward China's carbon neutrality [J].
Ruan, Ziwen ;
Lu, Xi ;
Yin, Zihua ;
Mobley, Shawn C. ;
Zhang, Chongyu ;
Wang, Jiaxing ;
Li, Yan ;
Kong, Zhaoyang ;
Shi, Guang ;
Chen, Dan ;
He, Kebin .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2024, 205
[25]   Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States [J].
Onat, Nuri Cihat ;
Kucukvar, Murat ;
Tatari, Omer .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 150 :36-49
[26]   Net Energy Analysis and Carbon Footprint of Solar Cells [J].
Cellura, Maurizio ;
Luu Le Quyen ;
Guarino, Francesco ;
Longo, Sonia .
2023 ASIA MEETING ON ENVIRONMENT AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, EEE-AM, 2023,
[27]   A Comparative Analysis of Energy Costs of Photovoltaic, Solar Thermal, and Wind Electricity Generation Technologies [J].
Dale, Michael .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2013, 3 (02) :325-337
[28]   Carbon footprint of milk produced at Italian buffalo farms [J].
Pirlo, G. ;
Terzano, G. ;
Pacelli, C. ;
Abeni, F. ;
Care, S. .
LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2014, 161 :176-184
[29]   Energy and carbon coupled water footprint analysis for straw pulp paper production [J].
Ma, Xiaotian ;
Zhai, Yijie ;
Zhang, Ruirui ;
Shen, Xiaoxu ;
Zhang, Tianzuo ;
Ji, Changxing ;
Yuan, Xueliang ;
Hong, Jinglan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 233 :23-32
[30]   LCA-based carbon footprint analysis of anaerobic digestion of coffee husk waste [J].
Fernandes, Matheus Augusto de Oliveira ;
Baeta, Bruno Eduardo Lobo ;
Adarme, Oscar Fernando Herrera ;
Fonseca, Alberto .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2025, 207