Reproducibility of wall shear stress assessment with the paraboloid method in the internal carotid artery with velocity encoded MRI in healthy young individuals

被引:21
作者
Box, Frieke M. A.
van der Geest, Rob J.
van der Grond, Jeroen
van Osch, Matthias J. P.
Zwinderman, Aeilko H.
Palm-Meinders, Nge H.
Doornbos, Joost
Blauw, Gerard-Jan
van Buchem, Mark A.
Reiber, Johan H. C.
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Div Imaging Proc, Dept Radiol, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gerontol & Geriat, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; blood flow; flow volume; modeling; image processing; wall shear stress; CEREBRAL-BLOOD-FLOW; ULTRASOUND; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; ANGIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.21086
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To verify whether wall shear stress (WSS) can be assessed in a reproducible manner using automatic modelbased segmentation of phase-contrast MR images by determination of flow volume and maximum flow velocity (Vmax) in cross-secti ons of these vessels. Materials and Methods: The approach is based on fitting a 3D paraboloid to the actual velocity profiles and on determining Vmax. WSS was measured in the internal carotid arteries of two groups of healthy young volunteers. The reproducibility of rescanning and repositionIng was studied in the first group. In the second group a I-week and a I-month interval was investigated. Reproducibility was calculated by the intraclass correlation (ICC). Results: The flow volume, Vmax, and WSS averaged over the cardiac cycle were found to be 287.8 +/- 29.7 mL/min, 37.0 +/- 4.6 cm/s, and 1. 13 +/- 0.16 Pa, respectively. The diastolic WSS varied between 1.00 +/- 0.2 1 Pa without averaging to 0.88 0.16 Pa with temporal and spatial averaging. Systolic WSS was 1.67 +/- 0.33 Pa without averaging and 1.67 +/- 0.25 Pa with averaging. ICC varied between 0.58 and 0.87 without averaging and between 0.75 and 0.90 with averaging for WSS. Conclusion: WSS in MR images of the internal carotid artery can be assessed semiautomatically with good to excellent reproducibility without inter- or intraobserver variability using model-based postprocessing.
引用
收藏
页码:598 / 605
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, DESIGN ANAL CLIN EXP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MCDONALDS BLOOD FLOW
[3]   Accuracy and precision of time-averaged flow as measured by nontriggered 2D phase-contrast MR angiography, a phantom evaluation [J].
Bakker, CJG ;
Kouwenhoven, M ;
Hartkamp, MJ ;
Hoogeveen, RM ;
Mali, WPTM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 13 (07) :959-965
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   Automatic model-based contour detection and blood flow quantification in small vessels with velocity encoded magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Box, FMA ;
Spilt, A ;
Van Buchem, MA ;
van der Geest, RJ ;
Reiber, JHC .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (09) :567-577
[6]  
BOX FMA, 2005, P ISMRM MIAM FL
[7]   Evaluation of common carotid hemodynamic forces - Relations with wall thickening [J].
Carallo, C ;
Irace, C ;
Pujia, A ;
De Franceschi, MS ;
Crescenzo, A ;
Motti, C ;
Cortese, C ;
Mattioli, PL ;
Gnasso, A .
HYPERTENSION, 1999, 34 (02) :217-221
[8]   RENAL-ARTERY BLOOD-FLOW - QUANTITATION WITH PHASE-CONTRAST MR-IMAGING WITH AND WITHOUT BREATH-HOLDING [J].
DEBATIN, JF ;
TING, RH ;
WEGMULLER, H ;
SOMMER, FG ;
FREDRICKSON, JO ;
BROSNAN, TJ ;
BOWMAN, BS ;
MYERS, BD ;
HERFKENS, RJ ;
PELC, NJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (02) :371-378
[9]   Operator dependence of 3-D ultrasound-based computational fluid dynamics for the carotid bifurcation [J].
Glor, FP ;
Ariff, B ;
Hughes, AD ;
Verdonck, PR ;
McG, SA ;
Barratt, DC ;
Xu, XY .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2005, 24 (04) :451-456
[10]   Image-based carotid flow reconstruction: a comparison between MRI and ultrasound [J].
Glor, FP ;
Ariff, B ;
Hughes, AD ;
Crowe, LA ;
Verdonck, PR ;
Barratt, DC ;
Thom, SAM ;
Firmin, DN ;
Xu, XY .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2004, 25 (06) :1495-1509