Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: Dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence

被引:262
作者
Reimer, P
Rummeny, EJ
Shamsi, K
Balzer, T
Daldrup, HE
Tombach, B
Hesse, T
Berns, T
Peters, PE
机构
[1] UNIV MUNSTER, DEPT SURG, D-48129 MUNSTER, GERMANY
[2] SCHERING AG, W-1000 BERLIN, GERMANY
关键词
contrast media; experimental studies; gadolinium; liver; MR; magnetic resonance (MR); contrast enhancement;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.199.1.8633143
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in the detection of focal liver lesions with respect to dose, side effects, and pulse sequence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized double-blinded trial was performed in 33 patients with focal solid liver lesions. A bolus of Gd-EOB-DTPA, a liver-specific contrast agent, was intravenously administered at three different doses (12.5, 25, and 50 mu mol per kilogram of body weight). Magnetic resonance imaging with different T1-weighted techniques was performed 20 and 45 minutes after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA. Changes in liver signal intensity, lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N), detectable liver lesions, side effects, and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: Gd-EOB-DTPA significantly (P <.05) increased liver signal intensity and lesion-liver C/N within the dose range tested. Lesion detection was improved 20 and 45 minutes after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA. A dose of 12.5 mu mol was sufficient for the detection of focal liver lesions, and the breath-hold, T1-weighted, fast low-angle shot pulse sequence was the most useful. No significant changes in vital signs, clinical laboratory test results, and urinalysis were observed. CONCLUSION: Gd-EOB-DTPA is an efficient, diagnostically useful, and safe contrast agent.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 183
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Armitage P, 1987, Statistical methods in medical research, V2nd
[2]   HEPATIC MR IMAGING WITH MN-DPDP - SAFETY, IMAGE QUALITY, AND SENSITIVITY [J].
BERNARDINO, ME ;
YOUNG, SW ;
LEE, JKT ;
WEINREB, JC .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 183 (01) :53-58
[3]  
BRASCH RC, 1992, RADIOLOGY, V183, P1
[4]   EVALUATION OF RADIATION-INDUCED LIVER-INJURY WITH MR-IMAGING - COMPARISON OF HEPATOCELLULAR AND RETICULOENDOTHELIAL CONTRAST AGENTS [J].
CLEMENT, O ;
MUHLER, A ;
VEXLER, VS ;
ROSENAU, W ;
BERTHEZENE, Y ;
KUWATSURU, R ;
BRASCH, RC .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 (01) :163-168
[5]   COMPARISON OF GD-EOB-DTPA AND GD-DTPA FOR CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING OF LIVER-TUMORS [J].
CLEMENT, O ;
MUHLER, A ;
VEXLER, VS ;
KUWATSURU, R ;
BERTHEZENE, Y ;
ROSENAU, W ;
BRASCH, RC .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1993, 3 (01) :71-77
[6]  
CLEMENT O, 1992, INVEST RADIOL, V27, P612
[7]  
GRANT D, 1993, 10TH EUR SOC MAGN RE, P251
[8]   FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS - MR IMAGING WITH MN-DPDP - INITIAL CLINICAL-RESULTS IN 40 PATIENTS [J].
HAMM, B ;
VOGL, TJ ;
BRANDING, G ;
SCHNELL, B ;
TAUPITZ, M ;
WOLF, KJ ;
LISSNER, J .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 182 (01) :167-174
[9]   PHASE-I CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF GD-EOB-DTPA AS A HEPATOBILIARY MR CONTRAST AGENT - SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND MR-IMAGING [J].
HAMM, B ;
STAKS, T ;
MUHLER, A ;
BOLLOW, M ;
TAUPITZ, M ;
FRENZEL, T ;
WOLF, KJ ;
WEINMANN, HJ ;
LANGE, L .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (03) :785-792
[10]   HEPATOBILIARY MR CONTRAST AGENTS - 5-SUBSTITUTED IRON-EHPG DERIVATIVES [J].
LAUFFER, RB ;
VINCENT, AC ;
PADMANABHAN, S ;
VILLRINGER, A ;
SAINI, S ;
ELMALEH, DR ;
BRADY, TJ .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1987, 4 (06) :582-590