Exploring reasons for late identification of children with early-onset hearing loss

被引:25
作者
Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth M. [1 ,2 ]
dos Santos, Johnny Cesconetto [3 ]
Grandpierre, Viviane [1 ,2 ]
Whittingham, JoAnne [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Fac Hlth Sci, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada
[2] Childrens Hosp Eastern Ontario, Res Inst, Child Hearing Lab, 401 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
[3] Univ Fed Espirito Santo, Audiol & Speech Language Pathol, Marechal Campos Ave 1468, BR-29043900 Vitoria, ES, Brazil
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Children; Newborn screening; Early detection; Delayed diagnosis; Congenital hearing loss; Early-onset hearing loss; SCREENING DEMONSTRATION PROJECT; PEDIATRIC AMPLIFICATION; EARLY INTERVENTION; LANGUAGE OUTCOMES; EARLY-CHILDHOOD; IMPAIRMENT; DEAFNESS; IMPACT; PREVALENCE; IMPLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.06.039
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Introduction: Several studies have shown that early identification of childhood hearing loss leads to better language outcomes. However, delays in the confirmation of hearing loss persist even in the presence of well-established universal newborn hearing screening programs (UNHS). The objective of this population-based study was to document the proportion of children who experienced delayed confirmation of congenital and early onset hearing loss in a UNHS program in one region of Canada. The study also sought to determine the reasons for delayed confirmation of hearing loss in children. Methods: Population level data related to age of first assessment, age of identification and clinical characteristics were collected prospectively for all children identified through the UNHS program. We documented the number of children who experienced delay (defined as more than 3 months) from initial audiologic assessment to confirmation of hearing loss. A detailed chart review was subsequently performed to examine the reasons for delay to confirmation. Results: Of 418 children identified from 2003 to 2013, 182 (43.5%) presented with congenital or early onset hearing loss, of whom 30 (16.5%) experienced more than 3 months delay from initial audiologic assessment to confirmation of their hearing disorder. The median age of first assessment and confirmation of hearing loss for these 30 children was 3.7 months (IQR: 2.0, 7.6) and 13.8 months (IQR: 9.7, 26.1) respectively. Close examination of the factors related to delay to confirmation revealed that for the overwhelming majority of children, a constellation of factors contributed to late diagnosis. Several children (n = 22; 73.3%) presented with developmental/medical issues, 15 of whom also had middle ear dysfunction at assessment, and 9 of whom had documented family follow-up concerns. For the remaining eight children, additional reasons included ongoing middle ear dysfunction for five children, complicated by family follow-up concerns (n = 3) and mild hearing loss (n = 1) and the remaining three children had isolated reasons related to family follow-up (n = 1) or mild hearing loss (n = 2). Conclusion: Despite the progress made in the early detection of pediatric hearing loss since UNHS, a substantial number of children referred for early assessment can experience late confirmation and intervention. In particular, infants with developmental and/or medical issues including middle ear disorders are at particular risk for longer time to confirmation of hearing loss. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 167
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]   Parents' perspectives on the impact of the early diagnosis of childhood hearing loss [J].
Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth ;
Graham, Ian D. ;
Durieux-Smith, Andree ;
Angus, Doug ;
Coyle, Doug .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2007, 46 (02) :97-106
[12]   Children With Mild Bilateral and Unilateral Hearing Loss: Parents' Reflections on Experiences and Outcomes [J].
Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth ;
Grandpierre, Viviane ;
Durieux-Smith, Andree ;
Gaboury, Isabelle ;
Coyle, Doug ;
Na, Eunjung ;
Sallam, Nusaiba .
JOURNAL OF DEAF STUDIES AND DEAF EDUCATION, 2016, 21 (01) :34-43
[13]   Pediatric Cochlear Implantation: Why Do Children Receive Implants Late? [J].
Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth M. ;
Ham, Julia ;
Whittingham, JoAnne .
EAR AND HEARING, 2015, 36 (06) :688-694
[14]   Mild Bilateral and Unilateral Hearing Loss in Childhood: A 20-Year View of Hearing Characteristics, and Audiologic Practices Before and After Newborn Hearing Screening [J].
Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth M. ;
Whittingham, JoAnne ;
Durieux-Smith, Andree .
EAR AND HEARING, 2014, 35 (01) :10-18
[15]   Clinical Practice for Children with Mild Bilateral and Unilateral Hearing Loss [J].
Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth M. ;
Durieux-Smith, Andree ;
Whittingham, JoAnne .
EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (03) :392-400
[16]   Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study [J].
Fortnum, HM ;
Summerfield, AQ ;
Marshall, DH ;
Davis, AC ;
Bamford, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7312) :536-539
[17]   Epidemiology of Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss With Universal Newborn Hearing Screening [J].
Ghogomu, Nsangou ;
Umansky, Amy ;
Lieu, Judith E. C. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2014, 124 (01) :295-300
[18]  
Gravel J.S., 2001, A sound foundation through early amplification: Conference proceedings from the second international conference, P85
[19]  
Hyde A., 2004, ONTARIO MED REV, V71, P27
[20]   Language ability after early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment [J].
Kennedy, CR ;
McCann, DC ;
Campbell, MJ ;
Law, CM ;
Mullee, M ;
Petrou, S ;
Watkin, P ;
Worsfold, S ;
Yuen, HM ;
Stevenson, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (20) :2131-2141