Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis: significance in T and N staging of gastric cancers

被引:34
作者
Liu, Song [1 ]
Zhang, Yujuan [1 ]
Chen, Ling [2 ]
Guan, Wenxian [3 ]
Guan, Yue [4 ]
Ge, Yun [4 ]
He, Jian [1 ]
Zhou, Zhengyang [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Med Sch, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Radiol Nanjing,Drum Tower Hosp, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ, Med Sch, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Pathol Nanjing,Drum Tower Hosp, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ, Med Sch, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg,Nanjing Drum Tower Hos, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ, Sch Elect Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210046, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging; Stomach neoplasm; Histogram; Staging; LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS; PROSTATE-CANCER; DIFFERENTIATION; ACCURACY; MRI; EUS; CT;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-017-3622-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis has been introduced and proved effective in assessment of multiple tumors. However, the application of whole-volume ADC histogram analysis in gastrointestinal tumors has just started and never been reported in T and N staging of gastric cancers. Methods: Eighty patients with pathologically confirmed gastric carcinomas underwent diffusion weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging before surgery prospectively. Whole-lesion ADC histogram analysis was performed by two radiologists independently. The differences of ADC histogram parameters among different T and N stages were compared with independent-samples Kruskal-Wallis test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the performance of ADC histogram parameters in differentiating particular T or N stages of gastric cancers. Results: There were significant differences of all the ADC histogram parameters for gastric cancers at different T (except ADC(min) and ADC(max)) and N (except ADC(max)) stages. Most ADC histogram parameters differed significantly between T1 vs T3, T1 vs T4, T2 vs T4, N0 vs N1, N0 vs N3, and some parameters (ADC(5%), ADC(10%), ADC(min)) differed significantly between N0 vs N2, N2 vs N3 (all P < 0.05). Most parameters except ADCmax performed well in differentiating different T and N stages of gastric cancers. Especially for identifying patients with and without lymph node metastasis, the ADC(10%) yielded the largest area under the ROC curve of 0.794 (95% confidence interval, 0.677-0.911). All the parameters except ADCmax showed excellent inter-observer agreement with intra-class correlation coefficients higher than 0.800. Conclusion: Whole-volume ADC histogram parameters held great potential in differentiating different T and N stages of gastric cancers preoperatively.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   A systematic review and meta-analysis of the utility of EUS for preoperative staging for gastric cancer [J].
Cardoso, Roberta ;
Coburn, Natalie ;
Seevaratnam, Rajini ;
Sutradhar, Rinku ;
Lourenco, Laercio Gomes ;
Mahar, Alyson ;
Law, Calvin ;
Yong, Elaine ;
Tinmouth, Jill .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2012, 15 :S19-S26
[2]   Advanced gastric cancer: Current treatment landscape and future perspectives [J].
Digklia, Antonia ;
Wagner, Anna Dorothea .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (08) :2403-2414
[3]   Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Assessment with Whole-Lesion Histogram Analysis of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient [J].
Donati, Olivio F. ;
Mazaheri, Yousef ;
Afaq, Asim ;
Vargas, Hebert A. ;
Zheng, Junting ;
Moskowitz, Chaya S. ;
Hricak, Hedvig ;
Akin, Oguz .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 271 (01) :143-152
[4]   Relationship Between Imaging Biomarkers of Stage I Cervical Cancer and Poor-Prognosis Histologic Features: Quantitative Histogram Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted MR Images [J].
Downey, Kate ;
Riches, Sophie F. ;
Morgan, Veronica A. ;
Giles, Sharon L. ;
Attygalle, Ayoma D. ;
Ind, Tom E. ;
Barton, Desmond P. J. ;
Shepherd, John H. ;
deSouza, Nandita M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (02) :314-320
[5]   Accuracy of EUS and CT imaging in preoperative gastric cancer staging [J].
Fairweather, Mark ;
Jajoo, Kunal ;
Sainani, Nisha ;
Bertagnolli, Monica M. ;
Wang, Jiping .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 111 (08) :1016-1020
[6]   Gastric cancer [J].
Hartgrink, Henk H. ;
Jansen, Edwin P. M. ;
van Grieken, Nicole C. T. ;
van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. .
LANCET, 2009, 374 (9688) :477-490
[7]   Clinicopathologic factors and molecular markers related to lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer [J].
Jin, Eun Hyo ;
Lee, Dong Ho ;
Jung, Sung-Ae ;
Shim, Ki-Nam ;
Seo, Ji Yeon ;
Kim, Nayoung ;
Shin, Cheol Min ;
Yoon, Hyuk ;
Jung, Hyun Chae .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (02) :571-577
[8]   Prospective Comparison of 3T MRI With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and MDCT for the Preoperative TNM Staging of Gastric Cancer [J].
Joo, Ijin ;
Lee, Jeong Min ;
Kim, Jung Hoon ;
Shin, Cheong-Il ;
Han, Joon Koo ;
Choi, Byung Ihn .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 41 (03) :814-821
[9]   Validation of the Seventh Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer [J].
Jung, Hun ;
Lee, Han Hong ;
Song, Kyo Young ;
Jeon, Hae Myung ;
Park, Cho Hyun .
CANCER, 2011, 117 (11) :2371-2378
[10]   Preoperative apparent diffusion coefficient value of gastric cancer by diffusion-weighted imaging: Correlations with postoperative TNM staging [J].
Liu, Song ;
Wang, Hao ;
Guan, Wenxian ;
Pan, Liang ;
Zhou, Zhuping ;
Yu, Haiping ;
Liu, Tian ;
Yang, Xiaofeng ;
He, Jian ;
Zhou, Zhengyang .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (03) :837-843