Atrial threshold variability: Implications for automatic atrial stimulation algorithms

被引:21
作者
Biffi, Mauro
Spitali, Girolamo
Silvetti, Massimo Stefano
Argnani, Selina
Rubino, Ida
Fontana, Pierluigi
Barbato, Gaetano
Mazzini, Elena
de Santo, Tiziana
Drago, Fabrizio
Boriani, Giuseppe
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Inst Cardiol, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
[2] Osped S Maria Croci Ravenna, Ravenna, Italy
[3] Osped Pediat Bambino Gesu Roma, Rome, Italy
[4] Osped Infermi Faenza, Faenza, Italy
[5] Osped Umberto I Lugo, Lugo, Italy
[6] Osped Sassuolo, Sassuolo, Italy
[7] Osped Maggiore Bologna, Bologna, Italy
[8] Medtronic Italia, Milan, Italy
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2007年 / 30卷 / 12期
关键词
atrial threshold variability; automatic capture management; atrioventricular conduction;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00890.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Automatic management of atrial stimulation by verification of atrial threshold (ACM) has recently been made feasible. We investigated circadian atrial threshold variability over the long term and the predictors of successful automatic atrial threshold measurement, in order to provide practical clues for programming ACM features, in such a way as to achieve daily threshold verification and > 99% effective atrial stimulation. Methods: Six daily attempts to measure atrial threshold were programmed in patients receiving an EnPulse (TM) pacemaker (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Atrioventricular (AV) conduction was maximized by programming Search AV+ (SAV+) to a resting Paced AV delay = 400 ms in the first month, and 600 ms thereafter. Results: Seventy-six patients had a median follow-up of 12 months. Median ACM success was 77%. Concordance between automatically and manually measured thresholds was observed during the entire follow-up (Rho = 0.82, P < 0.001). Daily variability in atrial threshold was < 0.5 V in > 94% of measurements in the first trimester after implantation, and < 0.5 V in > 99% of measurements thereafter, as well as any time after pacemaker replacement. Atrial threshold was measured on 86% of days: the predictors of ACM failure were AV block (AVB), high%Atrial pacing, and atrial fibrillation. Programming SAV+ to achieve 600 ms resting Paced AV decreased%Vpacing in patients with normal AV conduction and first-degree AVB, improving the ability to detect atrial threshold. Conclusions: The reliability of ACM is high over a long follow-up. On the basis of atrial threshold variability, a practical approach to ACM programming should be two daily atrial threshold measurements in patients with normal AV conduction and%Ap <= 40%, or with normal sinus activity and AVB, whereas 3-4 measurements should be recommended in patients with first-degree AVB and%Ap > 40% or with recurrent atrial fibrillation and AVB. The lowest adapted stimulation output should achieve at least threshold +1 V in the first trimester after implantation, then threshold +0.5 V thereafter, in order to achieve > 99.5% effective atrial stimulation.
引用
收藏
页码:1445 / 1454
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Role of ventricular autocapture function in increasing longevity of DDDR pacemakers: a prospective study
    Boriani, G
    Rusconi, L
    Biffi, M
    Pavia, L
    Sassara, M
    Malfitano, D
    Bongiorni, MG
    Padeletti, L
    Filice, I
    Sanfelici, D
    Maffei, P
    Vicentini, A
    Branzi, A
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2006, 8 (03): : 216 - 220
  • [2] Atrial evoked response integral for automatic capture verification in atrial pacing
    Boriani, G
    Biffi, M
    Cameron, D
    Datteri, S
    Snell, J
    Holmström, N
    Park, E
    Bornzin, GA
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 26 (01): : 248 - 252
  • [3] Boriani G, 2000, PACE, V23, P1783
  • [4] Clinical validation of new pacing-sensing configurations for atrial automatic capture verification in pacemakers
    Butter, C
    Hartung, WM
    Kay, GN
    Willems, R
    Zhang, G
    Lang, DJ
    Fleck, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (10) : 1104 - 1108
  • [5] Automatic adjustment of pacemaker stimulation output correlated with continuously monitored capture thresholds:: A multicenter study
    Clarke, M
    Liu, B
    Schüller, H
    Binner, L
    Kennergren, C
    Guerola, M
    Weinmann, P
    Ohm, OJ
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 21 (08): : 1567 - 1575
  • [6] Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes
    Connolly, SJ
    Kerr, CR
    Gent, M
    Roberts, RS
    Yusuf, S
    Gillis, AM
    Sami, MH
    Talajic, M
    Tang, ASL
    Klein, GJ
    Lau, C
    Newman, DM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (19) : 1385 - 1391
  • [7] An algorithm for automatic measurement of stimulation thresholds: Clinical performance and preliminary results
    Danilovic, D
    Ohm, OJ
    Stroebel, J
    Breivik, K
    Hoff, PI
    Markowitz, T
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 21 (05): : 1058 - 1068
  • [8] Pacing threshold trends and variability in modern tined leads assessed using high resolution automatic measurements: Conversion of pulse width into voltage thresholds
    Danilovic, D
    Ohm, OJ
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 22 (04): : 567 - 587
  • [9] Threshold tracking pacing based on beat by beat evoked response detection:: Clinical benefits and potential problems
    Duru, F
    Bauersfeld, U
    Schüller, H
    Candinas, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 4 (03) : 511 - 522
  • [10] Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block
    Gillis, Anne M.
    Puererfellner, Helmut
    Israel, Carsten W.
    Sunthorn, Henri
    Kacet, Salem
    Anelli-Monti, Michael
    Tang, Feng
    Young, Martin
    Boriani, Giuseppe
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 29 (07): : 697 - 705