A case-control study of risk factors for brucellosis seropositivity in Portuguese small ruminants herds

被引:25
作者
Coelho, A. M.
Coelho, A. C.
Roboredo, M.
Rodrigues, J.
机构
[1] Univ Tras Os Montes & Alto Douro, Dept Ciencias Vet, P-5001911 Vila Real Codex, Portugal
[2] Direccao Serv Vet Regiao Norte, Direccao Geral Vet, P-5370347 Mirandela, Portugal
[3] Univ Tras Os Montes & Alto Douro, Dept Edafol, P-5001911 Vila Real Codex, Portugal
关键词
brucellosis; case-control study; small ruminants; risk factors; logistic regression;
D O I
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.06.001
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
A case-control study involving 255 small ruminants herds randomly selected was carried out in Portugal between January and December 2004, to identify risk factors associated with brucellosis seropositivity. To achieve this objective, two groups of herds selected according their prevalence status were compared: cases" (farms with seroprevalence higher than 5%, n = 123) and "controls" (farms seronegatives, n = 132). A carefully structured questionnaire was used to collect data from each herd. A statistical analysis to compare "case" versus "control" herds was performed with the variables obtained from the questionnaire and the seroprevalence results. The effects on seroprevalence of several variables such as: individual characteristics; farm management practices; farm characteristics; animal health; knowledge and characteristics of farmers were evaluated. Data were analysed using logistic regression. Univariable analysis was used to screen the variables used in the logistic regression model. Nine variables were associated with brucellosis seropositivity in univariable analysis p < 0.10. These variables were retained for multivariable logistic regression model. Regression model identified five variables as risk factors for seropositivity. The odds of brucellosis were increased: herds with more than 116 animals (OR = 2.99); in herds with no cleaned-watering places (OR = 3.05); in herds with insufficient manure removal and insufficient cleaning of premises (OR = 2.87); in introduction of animals from non-free brucellosis herds or from herds of unknown status (OR = 12.11). In the other hand, farmers' age (the eldest) was related to decreased odds (OR = 0.4). Potential risk factors identified in this study were consistent factors associated with brucellosis seropositivity and support current recommendations for the control of brucellosis. Considering the paucity of epidemiological reports on brucellosis in the Northeast of Portugal and the absence of any data concerning factors related to either the prevention or the spread of the disease, our results could make a useful contribution towards the prevention of small ruminants brucellosis in the area. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 301
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Epidemiology and control of brucellosis in ruminants from 1986 to 1996 in Malta [J].
Abela, B .
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE DE L OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 1999, 18 (03) :648-659
[2]   Seroepidemiology of caprine brucellosis in Jordan [J].
Al-Majali, AA .
SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2005, 58 (01) :13-18
[3]   Epidemiology of ovine brucellosis in Awassi sheep in Northern Jordan [J].
Al-Talafhah, AH ;
Lafi, SQ ;
Al-Tarazi, Y .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2003, 60 (04) :297-306
[4]   ISOLATION OF BRUCELLA-MELITENSIS FROM ABORTING RUMINANTS IN JORDAN [J].
ALDOMY, FMM ;
JAHANS, KL ;
ALTARAZI, YH .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PATHOLOGY, 1992, 107 (02) :239-242
[5]  
Alton G. G., 1990, Animal brucellosis., P383
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Applied Logistic Regression
[8]  
Arribas Llorente J L, 1989, Rev Clin Esp, V185, P60
[9]  
AWAD FI, 1975, J VET SCI, V12, P49
[10]   Control of small ruminant brucellosis by use of Brucella melitensis Rev.1 vaccine:: laboratory aspects and field observations [J].
Banai, M .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 90 (1-4) :497-519