Teaching Grapheme-Phoneme Correspondences Using a Direct Mapping Approach for At-Risk Second Language Learners: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:18
作者
Yeung, Susanna Siu-sze [1 ]
Savage, Robert [2 ]
机构
[1] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] UCL, London, England
关键词
at risk; prevention; learning; disability; early identification; intervention; ENGLISH-LANGUAGE LEARNERS; READING-INSTRUCTION; FOLLOW-UP; PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS; SIMPLICITY PRINCIPLE; SYNTHETIC PHONICS; LITERACY SKILLS; ORAL LANGUAGE; CHILDREN; INTERVENTION;
D O I
10.1177/0022219419894563
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Reading interventions developed to teach grapheme-phoneme correspondences (GPCs) were evaluated among L2 at-risk readers. In the direct mapping of grapheme (DMG) condition, children's attention was explicitly drawn to the application of a graphemes taught on that day to shared reading of words in authentic text. In the control condition there was no such systematic daily linkage of the GPCs and texts. The two reading interventions were otherwise identical. Two hundred fifty-three Chinese Grade 1 and Grade 2 students were screened, and those who scored in the bottom 30% of an English word-reading test were identified as L2 at-risk readers. Seventy-one L2 at-risk readers were thus randomly assigned to two conditions, both of which were small-group reading interventions: (a) DMG or (b) taught control. We hypothesized a significant main effect of Intervention condition and significant interaction of Intervention by Phonological Awareness (PA) effects on word reading, word attack, spelling, and sentence comprehension favoring the DMG intervention. Results showed that predicted interaction effects were significant for word reading, spelling, and sentence comprehension. No other effects were significant. Results suggest that the daily Direct Mapping of taught GPCs to shared book reading promotes reading development in at-risk English L2 readers with stronger phonological skills.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 144
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[11]  
Dunn LM., 2007, PPVT 4 PEABODY PICTU, DOI DOI 10.1037/T15144-000
[12]   Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Buchner, Axel ;
Lang, Albert-Georg .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) :1149-1160
[13]  
Gerber M., 2004, LEARNING DISABILITIE, V19, P239, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2004.00109.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1540-5826.2004.00109.X]
[14]  
Graham S., 2017, READING RES Q, V53, P279
[15]   Meta-analysis of targeted small-group reading interventions [J].
Hall, Matthew S. ;
Burns, Matthew K. .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 66 :54-66
[16]   Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading-delay: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Hatcher, Peter J. ;
Hulme, Charles ;
Miles, Jeremy N. V. ;
Carroll, Julia M. ;
Hatcher, Janet ;
Gibbs, Simon ;
Smith, Glynnis ;
Bowyer-Crane, Claudine ;
Snowling, Margaret J. .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 47 (08) :820-827
[17]   Explicit phoneme training combined with phonic reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure [J].
Hatcher, PJ ;
Hulme, C ;
Snowling, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 45 (02) :338-358
[18]   AMELIORATING EARLY READING FAILURE BY INTEGRATING THE TEACHING OF READING AND PHONOLOGICAL SKILLS - THE PHONOLOGICAL LINKAGE HYPOTHESIS [J].
HATCHER, PJ ;
HULME, C ;
ELLIS, AW .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 65 (01) :41-57
[19]   Effective Word Reading Instruction: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? [J].
Henbest, Victoria S. ;
Apel, Kenn .
COMMUNICATION DISORDERS QUARTERLY, 2017, 39 (01) :303-311
[20]  
Hjetland H.N., 2017, CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC, V14, P1