Outcomes of spinal cord stimulation: Patient validation

被引:10
作者
Anderson, VC
Carlson, C
Shatin, D
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Neurol Surg, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] United Hlth Grp, Ctr Hlth Care Policy & Evaluat, Minneapolis, MN USA
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2001年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
chronic pain; low back pain; quality of life; spinal cord stimulation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1525-1403.2001.00011.x
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective. To identify aspects of daily life that have been most affected by chronic low back pain among spinal cord stimulation (SCS) patients and to determine the relative contribution that improvement in each would make to patients' quality of life (QOL). Materials and Methods, Telephone survey of 44 patients with chronic low back pain who were about to undergo or had been recently implanted with an SCS system. Patients were asked to define, by open-ended response and examiner-read list, those aspects of daily life that had been most affected by pain and to assess the relative importance that improvement in each would make to daily life. Results, Patients identified 13 areas of daily function that were most significantly impacted by chronic low back pain. Most frequently, activities of daily living, decreased ability to work, psychological changes, and limitations to social life and recreation were identified. Functional status change, decreased ability to walk, and ability to perform daily household activities were rated as the most important change from among items included in examiner-read list. Conclusions. Patients with chronic low back pain seek improvement in multiple dimensions of QOL after SCS, particularly increased physical activity, social relations, work status, and mood. It is likely that patients' assessment of SCS "success" correlates highly with functional improvement, As such, an understanding of SCS therapeutic benefit and satisfaction requires that QOL be carefully assessed in future outcome trials.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 17
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   A prospective multicenter study to assess the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation utilizing a multi-channel radio-frequency system for the treatment of intractable low back and lower extremity pain. Initial considerations and methodology [J].
Barolat, G .
NEUROMODULATION, 1999, 2 (03) :179-183
[2]  
BECK A, 1989, CLIN PSYCHOL REV, V9, P77
[3]  
Bergner M., 1973, MED CARE, V14, P56
[4]   Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain [J].
Burchiel, KJ ;
Anderson, VC ;
Brown, FD ;
Fessler, RG ;
Friedman, WA ;
Pelofsky, S ;
Weiner, RL ;
Oakley, J ;
Shatin, D .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (23) :2786-2794
[5]   SPINAL-CORD STIMULATION IN FAILED BACK SURGERY SYNDROME [J].
DELAPORTE, C ;
VANDEKELFT, E .
PAIN, 1993, 52 (01) :55-61
[6]   Spinal cord stimulation: A valuable treatment for chronic failed back surgery patients [J].
Devulder, J ;
DeLaat, M ;
VanBastelaere, M ;
Rolly, G .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1997, 13 (05) :296-301
[7]  
Fairbank J C, 1980, Physiotherapy, V66, P271
[8]   THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE - A GLOBAL MEASURE OF DISABILITY IN CHRONIC LOW-BACK PAIN [J].
FOLLICK, MJ ;
SMITH, TW ;
AHERN, DK .
PAIN, 1985, 21 (01) :67-76
[9]   A DAILY DIARY FOR QUALITY-OF-LIFE MEASUREMENT IN ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER TRIALS [J].
FRASER, SCA ;
RAMIREZ, AJ ;
EBBS, SR ;
FALLOWFIELD, LJ ;
DOBBS, HJ ;
RICHARDS, MA ;
BATES, T ;
BAUM, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1993, 67 (02) :341-346
[10]  
Helme R D, 1989, Clin Exp Neurol, V26, P113