Improved governance for energy efficiency in housing

被引:42
作者
Visscher, Henk [1 ]
Meijer, Frits [1 ]
Majcen, Dasa [1 ]
Itard, Laure [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, OTB Res Inst Built Environm, Julianalaan 134, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands
关键词
building control; building regulations; energy performance; governance; housing stock; occupants; performance gap; ASSESSING BUILDING PERFORMANCE; DUTCH DWELLINGS; CONSUMPTION; FEEDBACK; GAP;
D O I
10.1080/09613218.2016.1180808
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Current practices show that the goals of energy saving and CO2 reductions for creating an energy-neutral building stock can only be reached by strict and supportive governmental policies. In Europe the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) and the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) are driving forces for member states to develop and strengthen energy performance regulations both for new buildings (via building approval procedures) and the existing building stock (via energy performance certificates or labels). The effectiveness of these current governance instruments and their impact on actual CO2 reductions are found to be inadequate for ensuring actual (not hypothecated) energy performance is achieved. To realize the very ambitious energy-saving goals a radical rethink of regulatory systems and instruments is necessary. Building performance and the behaviour of the occupants is not well understood by policy-makers. Alternative forms of governance are needed that have more impact on the actual outcomes. Supportive governance to stimulate near-zero renovations in combination with performance guarantees is a promising approach. Furthermore, engagement with occupant practices and behaviours is needed. To ensure accurate outcomes-based governance, a better understanding of building performance and behaviours of occupants must be incorporated.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 561
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P EUR COUNC EN EFF E
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, REBOUND EFFECT HOME
[3]  
[Anonymous], P EUR COUNC EN EFF E
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Europe's buildings under the microscope. A country-by-country review of the energy performance of buildings
[5]   Defining the rebound effect [J].
Berkhout, PHG ;
Muskens, JC ;
Velthuijsen, JW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (6-7) :425-432
[6]   Assessing building performance in use 2: technical performance of the Probe buildings [J].
Bordass, B ;
Cohen, R ;
Standeven, M ;
Leaman, A .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2001, 29 (02) :103-113
[7]   Assessing building performance in use 5: conclusions and implications [J].
Bordass, B ;
Leaman, A ;
Ruyssevelt, P .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2001, 29 (02) :144-157
[8]   A new professionalism: remedy or fantasy? [J].
Bordass, Bill ;
Leaman, Adrian .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2013, 41 (01) :1-7
[9]   Predicted versus observed heat consumption of a low energy multifamily complex in Switzerland based on long-term experimental data [J].
Branco, G ;
Lachal, B ;
Gallinelli, P ;
Weber, W .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2004, 36 (06) :543-555
[10]   Mandating transparency about building energy performance in use [J].
Cohen, Robert ;
Bordass, Bill .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2015, 43 (04) :534-552