Party Cues in the News: Democratic Elites, Republican Backlash, and the Dynamics of Climate Skepticism

被引:72
作者
Merkley, Eric [1 ]
Stecula, Dominik A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Munk Sch Global Affairs & Publ Policy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
climate change; public opinion; climate denial; elite cues; party cues; opinion formation; content analysis; experiments; CONSERVATIVE THINK TANKS; NEW-YORK-TIMES; MEDIA; POLARIZATION; PERCEPTION; IDEOLOGY; PARTISAN; CAMPAIGNS; CONSENSUS; COVERAGE;
D O I
10.1017/S0007123420000113
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Supporters of the Republican Party have become much more skeptical of the science of climate change since the 1990s. This article argues that out-group cues from Democratic elites caused a backlash that resulted in greater climate skepticism. The authors construct aggregate measures of climate skepticism from nearly 200 public opinion polls at the quarterly level from 2001 to 2014 and at the annual level from 1986 to 2014. They also build time-series measures of possible contributors to climate skepticism using an automated media content analysis. The analyses provide evidence that cues from party elites - especially from Democrats - are associated with aggregate dynamics in climate change skepticism, including among supporters of the Republican Party. The study also involves a party cue survey experiment administered to a sample of 3,000 Americans through Amazon Mechanical Turk to provide more evidence of causality. Together, these results highlight the importance of out-group cue taking and suggest that climate change skepticism should be examined through the lens of elite-led opinion formation.
引用
收藏
页码:1439 / 1456
页数:18
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Achen Christopher H., 2016, DEMOCRACY REALISTS W
[2]   Revising the indexing hypothesis: Officials, media, and the Libya crisis [J].
Althaus, SL ;
Edy, JA ;
Entman, RM ;
Phalen, P .
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 1996, 13 (04) :407-421
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science
[4]  
Ansolabehere S., 2014, CHEAP CLEAN AMERICAN, DOI [10.7551/mitpress/9999.001.0001, DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/9999.001.0001]
[5]   Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in America [J].
Barber, Michael ;
Pope, Jeremy C. .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2019, 113 (01) :38-54
[6]   Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design [J].
Bechtel, Michael M. ;
Scheve, Kenneth F. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (34) :13763-13768
[7]   TOWARD A THEORY OF PRESS-STATE RELATIONS IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
BENNETT, WL .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 1990, 40 (02) :103-125
[8]  
Berinsky AdamJ., 2009, TIME WAR UNDERSTANDI
[9]   Do Voters Polarize When Radical Parties Enter Parliament? [J].
Bischof, Daniel ;
Wagner, Markus .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 63 (04) :888-904
[10]   Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage [J].
Boykoff, Maxwell T. ;
Boykoff, Jules M. .
GEOFORUM, 2007, 38 (06) :1190-1204