Impact of positive surgical margin status in predicting early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:20
作者
Morizane, Shuichi [1 ]
Yumioka, Tetsuya [1 ]
Makishima, Karen [2 ]
Tsounapi, Panagiota [1 ]
Iwamoto, Hideto [1 ]
Hikita, Katsuya [1 ]
Honda, Masashi [1 ]
Umekita, Yoshihisa [3 ]
Takenaka, Atsushi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tottori Univ, Fac Med, Dept Surg, Div Urol, 86 Nishi Cho, Yonago, Tottori 6838503, Japan
[2] Tottori Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, 86 Nishi Cho, Yonago, Tottori, Japan
[3] Tottori Univ, Div Pathol, Dept Pathol, 86 Nishi Cho, Yonago, Tottori, Japan
关键词
Positive surgical margin; Radical prostatectomy; Robotics; Prostate cancer; Biochemical recurrence; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s10147-021-01977-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background We investigated the association between positive surgical margin (PSM) status and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) to develop a prognostic factor-based risk stratification model for BCR. Methods We analyzed the data of 483 patients who underwent RARP at our hospital between October 2010 and April 2019; 435 patients without neoadjuvant therapy were finally included. The BCR-free survival rate was determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Effects of the PSM status, including the number of PSMs, Gleason score (GS) at a PSM, and the maximum PSM length for BCR, were investigated using Cox regression analysis. Results BCR was confirmed after RARP in 61 patients (14.0%), and PSM was confirmed in 74 patients (17.0%); PSM was a significant predictor of BCR (p < 0.001). The median number of PSMs was 2 (1-6), and the median maximum length of PSM was 6.0 (2.0-17.0) mm. Multivariable analysis showed lymph node invasion (p < 0.001), GS of >= 7 at a PSM (p = 0.022) and a maximum PSM length of > 6.0 mm (p = 0.003) were significant predictors of BCR. We classified the patients without lymph node invasion into good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups according to the other two risk factors (presence of 0, 1, and 2 factors, respectively) and rates of 1-year BCR-free survival (100.0, 72.7, and 48.1%, respectively). Conclusion Higher GS at PSM and greater length of PSM were significant predictors of BCR after RARP, and console surgeons should be careful to prevent PSM during RARP.
引用
收藏
页码:1961 / 1967
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Lymph node yield during radical prostatectomy does not impact rate of biochemical recurrence in patients with seminal vesicle invasion and node-negative disease
    Badani, Ketan K.
    Reddy, Balaji N.
    Moskowitz, Eric J.
    Paulucci, David J.
    Beksac, Alp Tuna
    Martini, Alberto
    Whalen, Michael J.
    Skarecky, Douglas W.
    Huynh, Linda My
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 36 (06) : 310.e1 - 310.e6
  • [2] Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Siddiqui, Sameer
    Bagniewski, Stephanie
    Bergstralh, Erik J.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Frank, Igor
    Blute, Michael L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (03) : 864 - 870
  • [3] The Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality Following Radical Prostatectomy During the Prostate Specific Antigen Era
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Crispen, Paul L.
    Carlson, Rachel E.
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Bergstralh, Eric J.
    Blute, Michael L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (03) : 1003 - 1009
  • [4] Brimo F, 2010, UROLOGY, V76, P1206, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.090
  • [5] Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality
    Chalfin, Heather J.
    Dinizo, Michael
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Partin, Alan W.
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    Humphreys, Elizabeth
    Han, Misop
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (11) : 1684 - 1689
  • [6] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy significantly reduced biochemical recurrence compared to retro pubic radical prostatectomy
    Fujimura, Tetsuya
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    Taguchi, Satoru
    Yamada, Yuta
    Sugihara, Toru
    Nakagawa, Tohru
    Niimi, Aya
    Kume, Haruki
    Igawa, Yasuhiko
    Homma, Yukio
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2017, 17
  • [7] Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Locally-advanced Prostate Cancer
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    De Lorenzis, Elisa
    Novara, Giacomo
    Fossati, Nicola
    De Groote, Ruben
    Dovey, Zach
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (02) : 249 - 256
  • [8] EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clinically Localised Disease
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Bellmunt, Joaquim
    Bolla, Michel
    Joniau, Steven
    Mason, Malcolm
    Matveev, Vsevolod
    Mottet, Nicolas
    Schmid, Hans-Peter
    van der Kwast, Theo
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Zattoni, Filliberto
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (01) : 61 - 71
  • [9] Progress in pelvic anatomy from the viewpoint of radical prostatectomy
    Hinata, Nobuyuki
    Sejima, Takehiro
    Takenaka, Atsushi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 20 (03) : 260 - 270
  • [10] Comparative Effectiveness of Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy Cancer Control
    Hu, Jim C.
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    Shih, Ya-Chen Tina
    Abdollah, Firas
    Chamie, Karim
    Wright, Jonathan L.
    Ganz, Patricia A.
    Sun, Maxine
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (04) : 666 - 672