A robust procedure for three-phase equilibrium calculations of water-hydrocarbon systems using cubic equations of state

被引:11
作者
Mortezazadeh, Emad [1 ]
Rasaei, Mohammad Reza [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Inst Petr Engn, Sch Chem Engn, Coll Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Phase stability testing; Flash calculations; Successive substitution; Newton-Raphson method; BFGS method; Phase envelop; CPU time; OF-STATE; MUTUAL SOLUBILITIES; PHASE-EQUILIBRIA; MULTIPHASE EQUILIBRIUM; HYDRATE PREDICTION; NEXT-GENERATION; MIXING RULES; MIXTURES; GAS; ELECTROLYTES;
D O I
10.1016/j.fluid.2017.07.007
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Phase equilibrium calculations are one of the main steps in the compositional simulation of hydrocarbon reservoirs, well tubing, oil and gas pipelines as well as separation units. The main phases in all hydrocarbon production systems from a reservoir to a stock tank are gas, oil, and water. In most studies, the aqueous phase is considered bulk and phase equilibrium calculations are conducted only on the oil and gas phases. In some conditions such as thermal processes, the solubility of water in other phases and also hydrocarbon components in the water phase cannot be ignored. The robustness of equilibrium calculations for a wide range of compositions, temperatures, and pressures, including near critical area and saddle point curve, is essential for rapid and stable simulation studies. In this study, we propose the three-phase equilibrium calculations in detail for water, oil and gas phases. All the handling steps and strategies to establish a robust and efficient phase stability testing and flash calculation are explained. Moreover, appropriate tolerance values for decision-makings in the algorithm are defined. We successfully present the effectiveness of our algorithm for some three-phase samples covering a wide range of composition and production conditions. (C)2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 174
页数:15
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   PREDICTION OF HIGH-PRESSURE GAS SOLUBILITIES IN AQUEOUS MIXTURES OF ELECTROLYTES [J].
AASBERGPETERSEN, K ;
STENBY, E ;
FREDENSLUND, A .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1991, 30 (09) :2180-2185
[2]   The next generation of hydrate prediction - Part III. Gibbs energy minimization formalism [J].
Ballard, AL ;
Sloan, ED .
FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 2004, 218 (01) :15-31
[3]  
de Hemptinne JC, 1998, REV I FR PETROL, V53, P283
[4]  
Debye P, 1923, PHYS Z, V24, P185
[5]   QUASI-NEWTON METHODS, MOTIVATION AND THEORY [J].
DENNIS, JE ;
MORE, JJ .
SIAM REVIEW, 1977, 19 (01) :46-89
[6]  
Donson C.R., 1944, Drilling and Production Practice, P173
[7]   EQUATION OF STATE WITH MULTIPLE ASSOCIATING SITES FOR WATER AND WATER HYDROCARBON MIXTURES [J].
ECONOMOU, IG ;
DONOHUE, MD .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1992, 31 (10) :2388-2394
[8]   Associating models and mixing rules in equations of state for water/hydrocarbon mixtures [J].
Economou, IG ;
Tsonopoulos, C .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1997, 52 (04) :511-525
[9]   MEASUREMENT AND PREDICTION OF 3-PHASE WATER/HYDROCARBON EQUILIBRIA [J].
EUBANK, PT ;
WU, CH ;
ALVARADO, JFJ ;
FORERO, A ;
BELADI, MK .
FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 1994, 102 (02) :181-203
[10]   The next generation of hydrate prediction - II. Dedicated aqueous phase fugacity model for hydrate prediction [J].
Jager, MD ;
Ballard, AL ;
Sloan, ED .
FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 2003, 211 (01) :85-107