Consensus Control for Reactive Power Sharing Using an Adaptive Virtual Impedance Approach

被引:15
作者
Alsafran, Ahmed S. [1 ]
Daniels, Malcolm W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dayton, Elect & Comp Engn Dept, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
关键词
adaptive virtual impedance; hierarchical control; islanded microgrids; leaderless consensus control; leader-followers consensus control; mismatched feeder lines; reactive power sharing; triangle mesh communication topology; DISTRIBUTED COORDINATION CONTROL; SECONDARY CONTROL; PARALLEL INVERTERS; CONTROL STRATEGIES; DROOP CONTROL; DESIGN; OPERATION; TOPOLOGY;
D O I
10.3390/en13082026
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Reactive power sharing among distributed generators (DGs) in islanded microgrids (MGs) presents control challenges, particularly in the mismatched feeder line condition. Improved droop control methods independently struggle to resolve this issue and centralized secondary control methods exhibit a high risk of collapse for the entire MG system under any failure in the central control. Distributed secondary control methods have been recently proposed to mitigate the reactive power error evident in the presence of mismatched feeder lines. This paper details a mathematical model of an adaptive virtual impedance control that is based on both leaderless and leader-followers consensus controls with a novel triangle mesh communication topology to ensure accurate active and reactive power sharing. The approach balances an enhanced rate of convergence with the anticipated implementation cost. A MATLAB/Simulink model with six DG units validates the proposed control performance under three different communication structures: namely, ring, complete, and triangle mesh topologies. The results suggest that leaderless consensus control is a reliable option with large DG systems, while the leader-followers consensus control is suitable for the small systems. The triangle mesh communication topology provides a compromise approach balancing the rate of convergence and the expected cost. The extensibility and scalability are advantages of this topology over the alternate ring and complete topologies.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, IEEE Std 1241-2010 (Revision of IEEE Std 1241-2000, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2011.5960751, DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2011.5706451, 10.1109/IEEESTD.2011.5706451]
[2]  
Azim MI, 2015, 2015 5TH AUSTRALIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (AUCC), P225
[3]   Synchronization and graph topology [J].
Belykh, T ;
Hasler, M ;
Lauret, M ;
Nijmeijer, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIFURCATION AND CHAOS, 2005, 15 (11) :3423-3433
[4]   Distributed Adaptive Voltage Control of Inverter-Based Microgrids [J].
Bidram, Ali ;
Davoudi, Ali ;
Lewis, Frank L. ;
Ge, Shuzhi Sam .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, 2014, 29 (04) :862-872
[5]  
Bisht Nivedita, 2015, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), V2, P88
[6]  
Bondy J. A., 1976, GRAPH THEORY APPL, DOI [10.1057/jors.1977.45, DOI 10.1057/JORS.1977.45]
[7]   Distributed Secondary and Optimal Active Power Sharing Control for Islanded Microgrids With Communication Delays [J].
Chen, Gang ;
Guo, Zhijun .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2019, 10 (02) :2002-2014
[8]  
ChethanRaj D., 2017, Int. J. Power Electron. Drive Syst, V8, P654, DOI DOI 10.11591/IJPEDS.V8.I2.PP654-666
[9]  
FIEDLER M, 1973, CZECH MATH J, V23, P298
[10]  
Godsil C., 2001, Algebraic graph theory, P279, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-0163-9