Radiation Dose Monitoring for Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures: Effect on Patient Radiation Exposure

被引:23
作者
Liu, Bob [1 ]
Hirsch, Joshua A. [1 ]
Li, Xinhua [1 ]
Sheridan, Robert M. [1 ]
Rehani, Madan M. [1 ]
Zheng, Hui [3 ]
Rabinov, James D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Biostat Ctr, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
SKIN INJURIES; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2019180799
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To analyze the clinical effect of continuous dose monitoring and patient follow-up for fluoroscopically guided vascular interventional procedures over 8 years. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, an in-house semiautomated system was developed for fluoroscopic dose monitoring. The quarterly number of procedures from January 2010 to December 2017 was analyzed with count time series to estimate quarterly change rate. Technologists recorded four dose surrogates in custom fields of institutional dictation software through a Web interface. Radiation doses were transferred automatically to the radiology report and a centralized dose database when the radiologist initiated procedure dictation. A medical physicist reported weekly on procedures with air kerma at the reference point (K-a,K-r) of 2 Gy or higher to a division-designated radiologist and hospital radiation safety committee who required the attending radiologist to set up follow-up appointments for patients who underwent procedures with a K-a,K-r greater than or equal to 5 Gy. Results: There were a total of 41 585 procedures; 1553 (3.7%) procedures had a K-a,K-r of 2-5 Gy. Among 240 procedures with K-a,K-r greater than 5 Gy, 22 had K-a,K-r greater than 9 Gy. The percentage of high K-a,K-r procedures decreased over time, going from 5.9% in 2010 to 2.0% in 2017 for procedures with K-a,K-r of 2-5 Gy and from 1.0% in 2010 to 0.13% in 2017 for procedures with K-a,K-r greater than or equal to 5 Gy. Relative reduction per quarter was approximately 2.7% (95% confidence interval: 1.5%, 3.8%) for K-a,K-r of 2-5 Gy and 4.5% (95% confidence interval: 1.5%, 7.6%) for K-a,K-r greater than or equal to 5 Gy. Conclusion: Eight-year temporal trends show three-to eightfold reduction in the number of high-dose procedures. (C) RSNA, 2019
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 749
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Left Atrial Appendage Closure Guided by Integrated Echocardiography and Fluoroscopy Imaging Reduces Radiation Exposure
    Jungen, Christiane
    Zeus, Tobias
    Balzer, Jan
    Eickholt, Christian
    Petersen, Margot
    Kehmeier, Eva
    Veulemans, Verena
    Kelm, Malte
    Willems, Stephan
    Meyer, Christian
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10):
  • [42] ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT'S PEAK SKIN DOSE USING GAFCHROMIC FILMS DURING INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY PROCEDURES: ROUTINE EXPERIENCE FEEDBACK
    Greffier, J.
    Moliner, G.
    Pereira, F.
    Cornillet, L.
    Ledermann, B.
    Schmutz, L.
    Lomma, M.
    Cayla, G.
    Beregi, J. P.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2017, 174 (03) : 395 - 405
  • [43] Biological Planning of Radiation Dose Based on In Vivo Dosimetry for Postoperative Vaginal-Cuff HDR Interventional Radiotherapy (Brachytherapy)
    Soror, Tamer
    Chafii, Ramin
    Lancellotta, Valentina
    Tagliaferri, Luca
    Kovacs, Gyorgy
    BIOMEDICINES, 2021, 9 (11)
  • [44] Fetal Radiation Dose in Common Diagnostic Radiology Procedures for Pregnant Patients: Findings from In-Phantom Measurements
    Tomic, Anja
    Brkic, Hrvoje
    Turk, Tajana
    Kasabasic, Mladen
    Bjelobrk, Ivana
    Kralik, Ivana
    De Monte, Francesca
    Zancope, Nicola
    Lombardi, Riccardo
    Majer, Marija
    Knezevic, Zeljka
    Horvat, Mercedes
    Skarica, Matko
    Maric, Zrinka
    Faj, Dario
    Kopacin, Vjekoslav
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [45] Patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology in the US: Advisory data sets and possible initial values for US reference levels
    Miller, Donald L.
    Hilohi, C. Michael
    Spelic, David C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (10) : 6276 - 6286
  • [46] Reduction of Radiation Exposure During Complex Interventions for Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions: Implementing Low Dose Radiation Protocols Without Affecting Procedural Success Rates
    Werner, Gerald S.
    Glaser, Peggy
    Coenen, Anja
    Moehlis, Hiller
    Tischer, Karl-Heinz
    Koch, Matthias
    Klingenbeck, Reinhold
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 89 (06) : 1005 - 1012
  • [47] Radiation Exposure and Safety Considerations in Interventional Radiology: Comparison of a Twin Robotic X-ray System to a Conventional Angiography System
    Ruff, Christer
    Partovi, Sasan
    Strobel, Isabella
    Kaleth, Stella
    Herz, Klaus
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Levitin, Abraham
    Kirksey, Levester
    Syha, Roland
    Artzner, Christoph
    Groezinger, Gerd
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (10)
  • [48] Radiation Exposure in Biliary Procedures Performed to Manage Anastomotic Strictures in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients: Comparison Between Radiation Exposure Levels Using an Image Intensifier and a Flat-Panel Detector-Based System
    Miraglia, Roberto
    Maruzzelli, Luigi
    Tuzzolino, Fabio
    Indovina, Pietro Luigi
    Luca, Angelo
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 36 (06) : 1670 - 1676
  • [49] Reducing radiation exposure in intra-medullary nailing procedures: Intra-medullary endo-transilluminating (iMET)
    Chu, William
    Wang, Jyhpyng
    Young, Shuenn-Tsong
    Chu, Woei Chyn
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2009, 40 (10): : 1084 - 1087
  • [50] Editor's Choice - Minimizing Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Procedures: Basic Knowledge, Literature Review, and Reporting Standards
    Hertault, A.
    Maurel, B.
    Midulla, M.
    Bordier, C.
    Desponds, L.
    Kilani, M. Saeed
    Sobocinski, J.
    Haulon, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 50 (01) : 21 - 36