Laparoscopic Small Bowel Length Measurement in Bariatric Surgery Using a Hand-Over-Hand Technique with Marked Graspers: an Ex Vivo Experiment

被引:7
作者
Slagter, Nienke [1 ,2 ]
van Wilsum, Mette [1 ]
de Heide, Loek J. M. [1 ]
Jutte, Ewoud H. [1 ]
Kaijser, Mirjam A. [1 ]
Damen, Stefan L. [1 ]
van Beek, Andre P. [3 ]
Emous, Marloes [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Ctr Leeuwarden, Ctr Obes Northern Netherlands CON, Henri Dunantweg 2, NL-8934 AD Leeuwarden, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Hanzepl 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Endocrinol, Hanzepl 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Bariatric surgery; Limb length; Small bowel length; Laparoscopic bowel length measurement; Y GASTRIC BYPASS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11695-022-05918-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Tailoring limb length in bariatric surgery is a subject of many studies. To acquire the optimal limb length, accurate measurement of the small bowel length is essential. Objective To assess the intra- and inter-individual variability of laparoscopic bowel length measurement using a hand-over-hand technique with marked graspers. Method Four bariatric surgeons and four surgical residents performed measurements on cadaver porcine intestine in a laparoscopic box using marked graspers. Each participant performed 10 times a measurement of three different lengths: 150, 180, and 210 cm. Acceptable percentage deviation from the goal lengths was defined as less than 10%, while unacceptable deviations were defined as more than 15%. Results The bariatric surgeons measured the 150-, 180-, and 210-cm tasks with 4% (CI 0.4, 9), - 6% (CI - 11, - 0.8), and 1% (CI - 4, 6) deviation, respectively. In total, the bariatric surgeons estimated 58 out of 119 times (49%) between the margins of 10% deviation and 36 times (30%) outside the 15% margin. Considerable inter-individual differences were found between the surgeons. The surgical residents underestimated the tasks with 12% (CI - 18, - 6), 16% (CI - 19, - 13), and 18% (CI - 22, - 13), respectively. Conclusion Bariatric surgeons estimated bowel length with on average less than 10% deviation. However, this still resulted in 30% of the measurements with more than 15% deviation. There were considerable inter-individual differences between the surgeons and residents structurally underestimated the bowel length. Ascertainment of measurement accuracy and adequate training is essential for bariatric procedures in which limb length is of importance.
引用
收藏
页码:1201 / 1208
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   MGB-OAGB: Effect of Biliopancreatic Limb Length on Nutritional Deficiency, Weight Loss, and Comorbidity Resolution [J].
Ahuja, Anmol ;
Tantia, Om ;
Goyal, Ghanshyam ;
Chaudhuri, Tamonas ;
Khanna, Shashi ;
Poddar, Anshuman ;
Gupta, Sonam ;
Majumdar, Kajari .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2018, 28 (11) :3439-3445
[2]  
Bodenstedt S, OBES SURG, V2021
[3]   The effect of Roux limb lengths on outcome after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A prospective, randomized clinical trial [J].
Choban, PS ;
Flancbaum, L .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2002, 12 (04) :540-545
[4]   Baseline data from American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery-designated Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence using the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database [J].
DeMaria, Eric J. ;
Pate, Virginia ;
Warthen, Michael ;
Winegar, Deborah A. .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2010, 6 (04) :347-355
[5]   Impact of gastric bypass operation on survival: A population-based analysis [J].
Flum, DR ;
Dellinger, EP .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 199 (04) :543-551
[6]   Accuracy and inter-operator variability of small bowel length measurement at laparoscopy [J].
Gazer, Benny ;
Rosin, Danny ;
Bar-Zakai, Barak ;
Willenz, Udi ;
Doron, Ofer ;
Gutman, Mordechai ;
Nevler, Avinoam .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (11) :4697-4704
[7]   Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with BMI <50:: A prospective randomized trial comparing short and long limb lengths [J].
Inabnet, WB ;
Quinn, T ;
Gagner, M ;
Urban, M ;
Pomp, A .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2005, 15 (01) :51-57
[8]  
Isreb S, 2009, OBES SURG, V19, P1044
[9]   Effects of experience and reference tools on laparoscopic length measurements [J].
Jackson, Hope T. ;
Zettervall, Sara L. ;
Teitelbaum, Ezra N. ;
Holzner, Matt ;
Weissler, Jason ;
Amdur, Richard L. ;
Vaziri, Khashayar .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (06) :1297-1302
[10]   COMPARISON OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, AND BIOCHEMISTRY OF HUMANS AND COMMONLY USED LABORATORY-ANIMALS [J].
KARARLI, TT .
BIOPHARMACEUTICS & DRUG DISPOSITION, 1995, 16 (05) :351-380