Assessment of Sustainable Socioeconomic Development in European Union Countries

被引:10
作者
Skvarciany, Viktorija [1 ]
Jureviciene, Daiva [1 ]
Volskyte, Gintare [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Fac Business Management, Dept Econ Engn, LT-10221 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
sustainable development; socioeconomic development; multicriteria decision-making approach (MCDA); evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS); hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA); ECONOMIC WELFARE; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; INDEX; MANAGEMENT; SITE;
D O I
10.3390/su12051986
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There are still debates in the scientific literature about the factors influencing countries' sustainable socioeconomic development. Therefore, the current article aims at determining the factors of sustainable socioeconomic development and assessing its level in the EU countries. The following methods were employed for the research: an evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA). EDAS was used to reveal which countries have the highest level of sustainable socioeconomic development, and which have the lowest. The ranking was done based on the appraisal score, which is an outcome of EDAS. Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was used for clustering the countries based on the appraisal scores in order to distinguish groups of countries having a similar level of sustainable socioeconomic development. The results revealed that the highest level of sustainable socioeconomic development is in Germany, and the lowest in Portugal. Based on HCA, the countries were divided into three groups. The first cluster's countries have the weakest sustainable socioeconomic development, and countries assigned to the third cluster have the best. In the current research, the third cluster consists of one country, Germany, which supports the results obtained with the EDAS method, i.e., Germany is the country with the highest level of sustainable socioeconomic development in the EU.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Making technological innovation work for sustainable development [J].
Anadona, Laura Diaz ;
Chan, Gabriel ;
Harley, Alicia G. ;
Matus, Kira ;
Moon, Suerie ;
Murthy, Sharmila L. ;
Clark, William C. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (35) :9682-9690
[2]  
[Anonymous], INTRO SUSTAINABLE DE
[3]  
Aversa R., 2016, Am. J. Eng. Appl. Sci, V9, P1027, DOI [10.3844/ajeassp.2016.1027.1036, DOI 10.3844/AJEASSP.2016.1027.1036]
[4]  
Balioti Vasiliki., 2018, PROCEEDINGS, V2, P637
[5]   Using TOPSIS for assessing the sustainability of government bond funds [J].
Bilbao-Terol, Amelia ;
Arenas-Parra, Mar ;
Canal-Fernandez, Veronica ;
Antomil-Ibias, Jose .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 49 :1-17
[6]  
Bostrom M., 2012, Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, V8, P1
[7]   Public Support of Private R&D-Effects on Economic Sustainability [J].
Cadil, Jan ;
Mirosnik, Karel ;
Petkovova, Ludmila ;
Mirvald, Michal .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
[8]   Economic sustainability assessment in semi-steppe rangelands [J].
Chelan, Morteza Mofidi ;
Alijanpour, Ahmad ;
Barani, Hossein ;
Motamedi, Javad ;
Azadi, Hossein ;
Van Passel, Steven .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 637 :112-119
[9]  
Dalati S, 2017, BUS MANAGE ED, V15, P14, DOI 10.3846/bme.2017.360
[10]  
Ewa R., 2011, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE, P200